Literature DB >> 25003995

Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.

Mei-Juan Wang1, Ying-Qian Liu, Ling-Chu Chang, Chih-Ya Wang, Yong-Long Zhao, Xiao-Bo Zhao, Keduo Qian, Xiang Nan, Liu Yang, Xiao-Ming Yang, Hsin-Yi Hung, Jai-Sing Yang, Daih-Huang Kuo, Masuo Goto, Susan L Morris-Natschke, Shiow-Lin Pan, Che-Ming Teng, Sheng-Chu Kuo, Tian-Shung Wu, Yang-Chang Wu, Kuo-Hsiung Lee.   

Abstract

Twelve novel 20-sulfonylamidine derivatives (9a-9l) of camptothecin (1) were synthesized via a Cu-catalyzed three-component reaction. They showed similar or superior cytotoxicity compared with that of irinotecan (3) against A-549, DU-145, KB, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) KBvin tumor cell lines. Compound 9a demonstrated better cytotoxicity against MDR cells compared with that of 1 and 3. Mechanistically, 9a induced significant DNA damage by selectively inhibiting Topoisomerase (Topo) I and activating the ATM/Chk related DNA damage-response pathway. In xenograft models, 9a demonstrated significant activity without overt adverse effects at 5 and 10 mg/kg, comparable to 3 at 100 mg/kg. Notably, 9a at 300 mg/kg (i.p.) showed no overt toxicity in contrast to 1 (LD50 56.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and 3 (LD50 177.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Intact 9a inhibited Topo I activity in a cell-free assay in a manner similar to that of 1, confirming that 9a is a new class of Topo I inhibitor. 20-Sulfonylamidine 1-derivative 9a merits development as an anticancer clinical trial candidate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25003995      PMCID: PMC4111373          DOI: 10.1021/jm5003588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


Introduction

Camptothecin (CPT, 1, Figure 1) is a naturally occurring alkaloid with remarkable antitumor effects.[1−3] Its antitumor activity has been ascribed to its ability to interfere with the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerase I (Topo I) by stabilizing an irreversible drug–enzyme–DNA ternary complex and preventing the religation of single-strand DNA breaks induced by Topo I.[4,5] Intensive synthetic medicinal chemistry efforts over the past decades have led to potent 1-derivatives, including topotecan (2) and irinotecan (3), which are now used clinically to treat ovarian, small cell lung, and colon cancers. Also, several derivatives, such as gimatecan (4), CKD-602 (5), and BNP-1350 (6), are in various stages of preclinical or clinical development.[6−8] Although clinically used 1-derivatives remain a promising class of antitumor agents, their therapeutic use has been severely hindered by toxicity issues and delivery problems, due to poor water solubility, as well as instability of the active lactone form, due to preferential binding of the opened carboxylate to serum albumin.[9,10]
Figure 1

Structures of camptothecin (1), topotecan (2), irinotecan (3), gimatecan (4), CKD-602 (5), and BNP-1350 (6).

Structures of camptothecin (1), topotecan (2), irinotecan (3), gimatecan (4), CKD-602 (5), and BNP-1350 (6). Several approaches, including the development of prodrugs (conjugates and polymer bound camptothecins), new formulations (liposomes or microparticulate carriers), and synthetic lipophilic camptothecins have been explored to improve the antitumor efficiency of the 1-family.[11−13] Most of these strategies aim to maintain the active closed-lactone form in the plasma compartment. A free 20-hydroxyl group favors lactone ring-opening due to the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonding,[14] while acylation of this group should stabilize the closed-lactone moiety.[15] Moreover, steric bulk in the introduced ester moiety can be desirable to impede hydrolysis of the ester bond by various enzymes, including carboxylesterases, thereby reducing the toxicity. Indeed, our own results,[16,17] as well as those of others with 20(S)-O-acyl esters,[18,19] 20(S)-O-carbonate linked tripeptide conjugates,[20] and 20(S)-O-linked glycoconjugates,[21] have supported the importance of esterified 1-derivatives for potent activity. Esterification of the 20-hydroxyl group also enhances plasma stability and augments in vivo antitumor activity compared with those of unmodified 1. Amidines are well known as important pharmacophores[22−25] and widely used in bioactive chemicals and drug molecular design. Also, the introduction of a sulfonyl group into a bioactive functional fragment results in significant changes in the compound’s bioactivity;[26,27] thus, sulfonylamidines may be useful structural motifs for the optimization of bioactive molecules. Because this group is also quite bulky, it is likely to sterically prevent large enzymes from easily hydrolyzing a 20(S)-O-acyl ester of 1, which should also reduce the toxicity. In contrast, SN-38, the compound formed from the hydrolysis of 3, is quite toxic.[28] Given these considerations, we postulated that the introduction of a sulfonylamidine group at the 20-position of 1 could lead to improved efficacy and reduced toxicity as well as optimize the physicochemical properties of a new 1-related anticancer drug candidate. Therefore, in the present study, we incorporated the functional fragment sulfonylamidine into 1 at the C-20 position via a Cu-catalyzed one pot reaction[29] and synthesized a novel series of derivatives of 1 as potential antitumor agents.

Results and Discussion

Chemistry

As shown in Scheme 1, the 20-hydroxyl group of 1 was esterified to furnish N-Boc-amino acid derivatives (7) in suitable yields by a simple modification of the carbodiimide method using a combination of ′-diisopropyl carbodiimide (DIPC) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). The N-Boc group of 7 was removed with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in CH2Cl2 (1:1) to form the key intermediate TFA salts 8. Subsequently, we applied a highly efficient Cu-catalyzed three-component coupling reaction,[29] in which 8 was reacted with p-toluenesulfonyl azide and a wide range of alkynes to afford the desired compounds 9a–l in 35–58% yields. The structures of the target molecules were characterized from 1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR, and HR-MS data.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of Target Compounds 9a–9l

Reagents and conditions: (i) DIPC/DMAP; (ii) 50% TFA-CH2Cl2; (iii) alkynes/CuI/TsN3/Et3N.

Synthesis of Target Compounds 9a–9l

Reagents and conditions: (i) DIPC/DMAP; (ii) 50% TFA-CH2Cl2; (iii) alkynes/CuI/TsN3/Et3N.

Antiproliferative Activity of New Compounds and Structure–Activity Relationship

The 12 novel 1-derivatives 9a–l were evaluated for in vitro antiproliferative activity against four human tumor cell lines, KB (nasopharyngeal), A-549 (lung), DU-145 (prostate), and KBvin (MDR KB subline), by using a sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay with triplicate experiments.[30] Compounds 1 and 3 were used as controls. The screening results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Data for 9a–l against Four Human Tumor Cell Linesa

 IC50 (μM)
cmpdA-549DU-145KBKBvin
9a0.031 ± 0.00350.050 ± 0.00380.14 ± 0.0180.026 ± 0.013
9b0.057 ± 0.00390.13 ± 0.0110.18 ± 0.00080.10 ± 0.0073
9c0.089 ± 0.00830.14 ± 0.00590.91 ± 0.0600.087 ± 0.0087
9d0.071 ± 0.00690.15 ± 0.0220.22 ± 0.0170.096 ± 0.0094
9e1.0 ± 0.111.7 ± 0.1411 ± 0.481.5 ± 0.11
9f1.3 ± 0.122.0 ± 0.2511 ± 0.282.2 ± 0.056
9g0.95 ± 0.0181.6 ± 0.0962.7 ± 0.00831.0 ± 0.13
9h0.89 ± 0.0391.1 ± 0.0164.4 ± 0.421.8 ± 0.030
9i1.2 ± 0.0668.3 ± 0.149.6 ± 0.0421.7 ± 0.16
9j6.5 ± 0.4311 ± 0.7511 ± 1.08.2 ± 0.61
9k0.12 ± 0.0100.22 ± 0.0250.85 ± 0.0240.12 ± 0.0019
9l0.083 ± 0.0100.20 ± 0.0130.31 ± 0.0210.14 ± 0.0081
10.016 ± 0.00050.029 ± 0.00250.037 ± 0.00310.12 ± 0.0091
39.5 ± 0.119.3 ± 0.619.8 ± 0.48>20

Each assay was performed in triplicate with duplicated samples, and averaged IC50 (μM) values are expressed with standard deviation (SD). A549, lung carcinoma; DU-145, hormone-insensitive prostate cancer; KB, originally isolated from epidermoid carcinoma of the nasopharynx; and KBvin, vincristine-resistant KB subline.

Each assay was performed in triplicate with duplicated samples, and averaged IC50 (μM) values are expressed with standard deviation (SD). A549, lung carcinoma; DU-145, hormone-insensitive prostate cancer; KB, originally isolated from epidermoid carcinoma of the nasopharynx; and KBvin, vincristine-resistant KB subline. All 12 new compounds (9a–l) exhibited significant in vitro cytotoxic activity against the four tested tumor cell lines, with IC50 values ranging from 0.026 to 11 μM, indicating that both the R1 and R2 groups in the 20-sulfonylamidine side chain might influence the cytotoxic activity of the new 1-derivatives. The new compounds 9a–l (except 9a against KBvin) were less potent than 1; however, all of the new derivatives showed equivalent or superior cytotoxic activity compared with that of 3. Among the newly synthesized derivatives, 9a was the most potent compound against the four tested tumor cell lines. Interestingly, 9a also showed greater cytotoxic activity against KBvin (IC50 0.026 μM) compared with that of 1 and 3 (IC50 0.12 and >20 μM, respectively). The results also revealed that the A-549 cell line was more sensitive than the other three cell lines to these compounds, which is consistent with the clinical behavior of other 1-derivatives.[19] Structure–activity relationship (SAR) correlations were also identified for these new 20-sulfonylamidine derivatives of 1. When the R2 group was fixed as phenyl and the R1 group in the sulfonylamidines was varied, hydrogen (9b) and methyl (9d) gave the best results compared with those of larger alkyl groups in 9f (isopropyl), 9h (isobutyl), and 9j (sec-butyl). Similar results were seen in the corresponding derivatives bearing a p-methoxyphenyl R2 group. For example, against the A-549 cell line, the rank order of cytotoxic potency was 9a (H) > 9c (methyl) > 9g (isobutyl) ≥ 9e (isopropyl) ≥ 9i (sec-butyl). Therefore, small aliphatic chains appear to be the best R1 substituents for greater cytotoxic potency. When the R1 group was kept constant, and the R2 group was changed from phenyl to p-methoxyphenyl, the cytotoxic activity often improved (for example, compare 9b to 9a, 9f to 9e, 9h to 9g, or 9j to 9i against KBvin). In addition, compound 9l bearing a hydroxymethyl R2 group displayed comparable (DU-145, KB) or greater (A-549, KBvin) cytotoxic activity compared to that of 9k with a p-methoxyphenyl R2 group. Compound 9k, which also has a benzyl R1 group, generally exhibited intermediate potency between compounds with smaller (9a and 9c) and larger (9e, 9g, and 9i) alkyl R1 groups. These findings indicated that the cytotoxic profile of 1-derivatives may be sensitive to the size and electronic density of the substituents at C-20. On the basis of these in vitro results, compound 9a was selected for in vivo evaluation.

Mechanism of Action Studies on 9a

Inhibition of Topo I Activity by 9a in a Cell-Free System

A 1-derivative with an esterified 20-hydroxy group is expected to be activated by digestion with carboxylesterases. To determine whether intact 9a inhibits Topo I, a cell-free Topo I activity assay was employed using purified recombinant human Topo I (Figure 2A). In this assay, supercoiled plasmid DNA is relaxed and nicked by recombinant Topo I. Thus, with the vehicle control or a test compound that has no inhibitory effect on Topo I activity, relaxed and nicked DNA are found. As seen in Figure 2A, 3, known to be a prodrug of 1, showed the same result since it cannot be activated in this cell-free system as it is by carboxylesterases in the cell. In contrast, SN-38, a bioactive metabolite of 3, inhibited Topo I activity. Notably, we found that intact 9a inhibited Topo I activity in this cell-free assay in a manner similar to that of 1 (Figure 2A). We authenticated the inhibitory effect of 9a against Topo I in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2B). Thus, we confirmed that 9a is a new class of Topo I inhibitor.
Figure 2

Compound 9a directly inhibits Topo I in a cell-free system. (A) Recombinant human Topo I was incubated with the vehicle (CTL), 100 nM 9a, 100 nM 1 (CPT), or 1 μM 3 (Irinotecan) followed by incubation with supercoiled plasmid DNA. Plasmid DNA was separated by agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. SN-38 (100 nM), an active metabolite of 3, was used as a positive control. (B) Dose-dependent inhibition of Topo I by 9a. Recombinant human Topo I was incubated with supercoiled plasmid DNA in the presence of different concentrations of 9a as indicated. These results show that 9a directly inhibits recombinant human Topo I in a dose–response manner.

Compound 9a directly inhibits Topo I in a cell-free system. (A) Recombinant human Topo I was incubated with the vehicle (CTL), 100 nM 9a, 100 nM 1 (CPT), or 1 μM 3 (Irinotecan) followed by incubation with supercoiled plasmid DNA. Plasmid DNA was separated by agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. SN-38 (100 nM), an active metabolite of 3, was used as a positive control. (B) Dose-dependent inhibition of Topo I by 9a. Recombinant human Topo I was incubated with supercoiled plasmid DNA in the presence of different concentrations of 9a as indicated. These results show that 9a directly inhibits recombinant human Topo I in a dose–response manner.

Induction of Apoptosis by 9a in Human Tumor Cells

Because A-549 human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells displayed higher sensitivity than the other tested cancer cell lines to 9a in the preliminary cytotoxicity profile, A-549 cells were used in our mechanistic study. Initially, we investigated morphological cellular changes. After exposure to 9a, A-549 cells showed apoptotic morphological features, including cell shrinkage and membrane blebbing (Figure 3A). Apoptosis induction was further confirmed by double staining with FITC-annexin V and propidium iodide, showing that 9a treatment increased the percentage of apoptotic cells (annexin V positive cell population: vehicle versus 9a, 24 h, 1.1% versus 3.7%, P < 0.01; 48 h, 2.0% versus 34.1%, P < 0.001) (Figure 3B). Western blot analysis showed that cleaved caspases, the executors of apoptosis, were formed in response to 9a, including caspase-8, -9, and -3 (Figure 3C). PARP, a hallmark of apoptosis, was also activated by 9a (Figure 3C). These data demonstrated that 9a inhibits A-549 cell growth through apoptosis induction.
Figure 3

Induction of apoptosis by 9a. (A) Compound 9a induced apoptotic morphological alternation. A-549 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 100 nM 9a for 24 or 48 h. Morphological changes were observed under a phase-contrast microscope. (B) Compound 9a induces apoptosis. A-549 cells were treated with the vehicle (CTL) or 100 nM 9a for 24 or 48 h followed by FITC-annexin V with propidium iodide double staining. Percentages of apoptotic cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Compound 9a activates caspases. A-549 cells were treated with 100 nM 9a at indicated times. Cells were harvested and lysed for the determination of caspase cleavage using Western blot analysis.

Induction of apoptosis by 9a. (A) Compound 9a induced apoptotic morphological alternation. A-549 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 100 nM 9a for 24 or 48 h. Morphological changes were observed under a phase-contrast microscope. (B) Compound 9a induces apoptosis. A-549 cells were treated with the vehicle (CTL) or 100 nM 9a for 24 or 48 h followed by FITC-annexin V with propidium iodide double staining. Percentages of apoptotic cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Compound 9a activates caspases. A-549 cells were treated with 100 nM 9a at indicated times. Cells were harvested and lysed for the determination of caspase cleavage using Western blot analysis.

Activation of DNA Damage Response Pathway by 9a

The main effect of 1 is to bind to and stabilize the covalent Topo I-DNA complex, thus the induction of cell cycle delay in S phase, preventing DNA ligation and eventually leading to apoptosis.[31] Whether 9a activates the same pathway as 1 in A-549 cells was examined to demonstrate the mechanism of action. First, we determined the effect of 9a on cell cycle distribution using flow cytometry analysis (Figure 4A). As we expected, treatment with 9a for 24 h resulted in increased cell populations in S and sub-G1 phases. A Topo I-mediated DNA cleavage assay was performed to examine whether 9a exhibits an inhibitory effect on Topo I activity in the cell. The results showed that 9a inhibited the relaxation of supercoiled DNA, which is similar to the effect of 1 (Figure 4B). However, both 9a and 1 failed to decatenate kineoplast DNA (kDNA), whereas etoposide, a known Topo II inhibitor, effectively blocked the decatenation of kDNA (Figure 4C). Because it has been shown that 1-Topo I-DNA covalent complexes enhance the transcription-dependent degradation of Topo I via a 26S proteasome pathway,[32] the effects of 9a on the expression levels of Topo I and Topo II were investigated. Western blot analysis showed that 9a significantly inhibited protein levels of Topo I after 8 h of treatment and slightly affected levels of Topo IIα and Topo IIβ after 24 h treatment (Figure 4D). These results clearly demonstrated that 9a inhibited Topo I without interfering with Topo II activity. Compound 9a acts directly on Topo I and results in the accumulation of covalent Topo I-DNA complexes followed by proteasomal Topo I degradation, which is the same effect as 1, and contributes to 9a’s cytotoxicity.
Figure 4

Mechanisms of action of 9a. (A) Accumulation of S phase by 9a. Cell cycle distribution of A-549 was analyzed by a flow cytometer after treatment with 0 (CTL), 30, 100, or 300 nM 9a for 24 h followed by staining with propidium iodide. **, P < 0.01. (B) Inhibition of Topo I activity by 9a in vitro. A-549 cells were treated with the vehicle (CTL), 9a (30, 100 nM), or 1 (30, 100 nM) for 1 h. Cells were harvested for Topo I activity assay as described in Experimental Section. (C) Selective inhibition of Topo I by 9a. A-549 cells were treated with 9a (100 nM), 1 (100 nM), or Topo II inhibitor etoposide (30 μM) for 1 h, followed by the Topo II activity assay. (D) Depression of Topo I expression by 9a. A-549 cells were treated with vehicle (CTL) or 100 nM 9a for the indicated hours. Whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies to Topo I, Topo IIα, Topo IIβ, and β-actin as a loading control. These results demonstrated that compound 9a selectively inhibited Topo I activity and expression. (E) Activation of DNA damage checkpoint proteins by 9a. Whole cell extracts were prepared from A-549 cells treated with 100 nM 9a or 100 nM 1 for the indicated hours. Phosphorylation of DNA damage checkpoint proteins were detected by Western blotting using specific antibodies to phosphorylated ATM (p-ATM), ATR (p-ATR), Chk1 (p-Chk1), Chk2 (p-Chk2), p-H2AX, and p53 (p-p53) as indicated. Total amount of each protein and β-actin was detected by the pan antibody to each protein as the loading control. (F) Activation of apoptosis pathway by 9a. Whole cell lysates were prepared from A-549 cells treated with 100 nM 9a or vehicle (CTL) for the indicated hours followed by detection of apoptosis-related proteins as indicated. (G) Schematic representation of the mechanisms of action of 9a. Compound 9a (YQL-9a) directly inhibits Topo I enzymatic activity and depresses Topo I expression, which results in DNA damage checkpoint activation, cell cycle delay at S phase, and subsequently apoptosis pathway stimulation.

Mechanisms of action of 9a. (A) Accumulation of S phase by 9a. Cell cycle distribution of A-549 was analyzed by a flow cytometer after treatment with 0 (CTL), 30, 100, or 300 nM 9a for 24 h followed by staining with propidium iodide. **, P < 0.01. (B) Inhibition of Topo I activity by 9a in vitro. A-549 cells were treated with the vehicle (CTL), 9a (30, 100 nM), or 1 (30, 100 nM) for 1 h. Cells were harvested for Topo I activity assay as described in Experimental Section. (C) Selective inhibition of Topo I by 9a. A-549 cells were treated with 9a (100 nM), 1 (100 nM), or Topo II inhibitor etoposide (30 μM) for 1 h, followed by the Topo II activity assay. (D) Depression of Topo I expression by 9a. A-549 cells were treated with vehicle (CTL) or 100 nM 9a for the indicated hours. Whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies to Topo I, Topo IIα, Topo IIβ, and β-actin as a loading control. These results demonstrated that compound 9a selectively inhibited Topo I activity and expression. (E) Activation of DNA damage checkpoint proteins by 9a. Whole cell extracts were prepared from A-549 cells treated with 100 nM 9a or 100 nM 1 for the indicated hours. Phosphorylation of DNA damage checkpoint proteins were detected by Western blotting using specific antibodies to phosphorylated ATM (p-ATM), ATR (p-ATR), Chk1 (p-Chk1), Chk2 (p-Chk2), p-H2AX, and p53 (p-p53) as indicated. Total amount of each protein and β-actin was detected by the pan antibody to each protein as the loading control. (F) Activation of apoptosis pathway by 9a. Whole cell lysates were prepared from A-549 cells treated with 100 nM 9a or vehicle (CTL) for the indicated hours followed by detection of apoptosis-related proteins as indicated. (G) Schematic representation of the mechanisms of action of 9a. Compound 9a (YQL-9a) directly inhibits Topo I enzymatic activity and depresses Topo I expression, which results in DNA damage checkpoint activation, cell cycle delay at S phase, and subsequently apoptosis pathway stimulation. Compound 1 can induce DNA damage and activate the ATM-Chk2 DNA damage-response pathway to trigger apoptotic pathways in cancer cells.[33] We found that ATM underwent phosphorylation at the Ser1981 residue after 0.5 h treatment with 9a (Figure 4E). Activation of ATM kinase was confirmed by detecting the phosphorylation of downstream effectors, Chk1, Chk2, and histone H2AX (Figure 4E). Phosphorylation of H2AX at the Ser139 residue (γH2AX) indicated that 9a caused DNA double-strand breaks. P53 plays a critical role in DNA-damage functions, including cell cycle regulation and apoptosis triggering.[34] The up-regulation and phosphorylation of p53 were greatly enhanced by 9a (Figure 4E). P53 downstream apoptotic proteins such as PUMA and BAX were also predominantly increased by 9a. Furthermore, 9a up-regulated FADD, a component of death receptor-mediated extrinsic apoptosis, and down-regulated the pro-survival proteins Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 by preventing leakage of mitochondrial damage contents (Figure 4F). Taken together, compound 9a (YQL-9a) directly inhibits Topo I activity and depresses Topo I expression, which induces cell cycle delay at S phase as well as activation of the DNA damage-response pathway, and subsequently activates the apoptosis pathway (Figure 4G). Our data support the superiority of 9a over parent compound 1, suggesting that 9a is an excellent potential anticancer drug candidate. Therefore, we further investigated the antitumor activity of 9a and toxicological evaluation in vivo.

Antitumor Activity of 9a in Vivo

Xenograft model antitumor assay using human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HCT116 was performed according to the regimen in Table 2. The 31-day study utilized four groups of mice (n = 8) bearing established HCT116 xenograft with mean volumes of approximately 200 mm3 on day one. The tumor growth and animal body weight change for each treatment group were measured three times per week (Figure 5). Compound 9a was administered intravenously (i.v.) for 7 days and then intraperitoneally (i.p.) at 5 and 10 mg/kg once every day (QD) to the end. Two of eight and three of eight mice showed complete regression in the 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. There were no significant changes in body weight at either dose. The experimental control using 3 also exhibited antitumor activity at a dose of 100 mg/kg once every week (QWK) (P < 0.001), and three mice showed complete regression, supporting the accuracy of our in vivo evaluation. On the basis of the Student’s t-test evaluation, 9a at 5 mg/kg (P < 0.01) and 10 mg/kg (P < 0.001) exhibited significant antitumor activity in vivo without overt signs of symptoms and an anaphylactic reaction.
Table 2

Study Design of the Xenograft Model Antitumor Assaya

  treatment regimen
groupnagentmg/kgschedule
18vehicle QD
289a5QD
389a10QD
483100QWK

Saline containing 5% DMSO and 5% cremophor were used as the vehicle. QD, once every day. QWK, once every week.

Figure 5

Potent antitumor activity of 9a in vivo. A xenograft model antitumor assay was performed using human colorectal HCT116 cells. When the tumor graft volume reached about 200 mm3, mice were randomly separated into four groups (n = 8), and administration of compound was started according to the treatment regimen as shown in Table 2 (left panel). Compound 9a (YQL-9a) potently prevented tumor growth at 5 or 10 mg/kg compared with the vehicle (control), without significant effect on body weight (right panel). Furthermore, two or three mice administered 9a at 5 or 10 mg/kg, respectively, underwent complete regression (CR). Compound 3 (irinotecan) was used as an experimental control, and three mice displayed CR. These results were statistically significant (P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

Saline containing 5% DMSO and 5% cremophor were used as the vehicle. QD, once every day. QWK, once every week. Potent antitumor activity of 9a in vivo. A xenograft model antitumor assay was performed using human colorectal HCT116 cells. When the tumor graft volume reached about 200 mm3, mice were randomly separated into four groups (n = 8), and administration of compound was started according to the treatment regimen as shown in Table 2 (left panel). Compound 9a (YQL-9a) potently prevented tumor growth at 5 or 10 mg/kg compared with the vehicle (control), without significant effect on body weight (right panel). Furthermore, two or three mice administered 9a at 5 or 10 mg/kg, respectively, underwent complete regression (CR). Compound 3 (irinotecan) was used as an experimental control, and three mice displayed CR. These results were statistically significant (P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

Toxicological Evaluation of 9a in Mice

Acute toxicity of 9a in the mouse was evaluated pathologically. Sixty 8-week-old male BALB/c mice were randomized into six groups (n = 10) to receive 0 (vehicle only), 30, 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg of 9a i.p. on day zero. One group was kept without treatment as a normal control. All treated animals showed no anaphylactic responses, allergic reactions, or significant body weight loss (Figure 6A) and were as healthy as the normal control animals, indicating significantly reduced toxicity compared with that of 1 (LD50 = 56.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and 3 (LD50 = 177.5 mg/kg, i.p.).[35] At the end of the experimental period, all animals were euthanized, and tissues from the liver, lung, kidney, and spleen were evaluated histopathologically according to the guidelines described by Shackelford et al.[36] as well as being graded for symptomatic lesions. Histopathological evaluations included (1) glycogen deposition, inflammatory cell infiltration, and focal necrosis in the liver (Figure 6B), (2) regeneration of renal tubule, inflammatory cell infiltration, and chronic progressive nephropathy in kidney, and (3) inflammatory cell infiltration and adenoma in the lung (Figure 6C). Although a few microscopic lesions were observed in tissues from both 9a-treated and untreated mice, all lesions were considered spontaneous lesions and were not related to the administration of 9a. Thus, 9a-treated animals showed no adverse effects according to hepatic, splenic, kidney, and lung parameters. Thus, the animals apparently tolerated treatment with 300 mg/kg of 9a, portending an acceptable safety profile.
Figure 6

Pathological evaluation of toxicity of 9a in mice. (A) No significant effect on body weight. Sixty BALB/c mice were randomly divided into six groups, and 10 animals in each group received an i.p. injection of 9a at 0 (vehicle), 30, 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg, or did not receive an injection at all (normal). (B) Histopathological examination of hepatotoxicity. Formalin-fixed livers from animals without (normal) or with injection of vehicle, 100 mg/kg 9a or 300 mg/kg 9a, were embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxyline and eosin (H&E). Stained sections were evaluated histopathologically for glycogen deposition, focal necrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Central vein (C) and portal tract (P) were indicated (upper left panel). Post-mortem change was labeled (*). (C) Summary of histopathological evaluation of toxicity. Tissues from the liver, spleen, kidney, and lung were fixed with formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were evaluated histopathologically as indicated after staining with H&E. These results demonstrated that the body weight, liver, spleen, kidney, and lung were not affected by treatment with 9a, even at 300 mg/kg.

Pathological evaluation of toxicity of 9a in mice. (A) No significant effect on body weight. Sixty BALB/c mice were randomly divided into six groups, and 10 animals in each group received an i.p. injection of 9a at 0 (vehicle), 30, 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg, or did not receive an injection at all (normal). (B) Histopathological examination of hepatotoxicity. Formalin-fixed livers from animals without (normal) or with injection of vehicle, 100 mg/kg 9a or 300 mg/kg 9a, were embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxyline and eosin (H&E). Stained sections were evaluated histopathologically for glycogen deposition, focal necrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration. Central vein (C) and portal tract (P) were indicated (upper left panel). Post-mortem change was labeled (*). (C) Summary of histopathological evaluation of toxicity. Tissues from the liver, spleen, kidney, and lung were fixed with formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were evaluated histopathologically as indicated after staining with H&E. These results demonstrated that the body weight, liver, spleen, kidney, and lung were not affected by treatment with 9a, even at 300 mg/kg. We postulate that the toxicological improvement against normal tissues might be associated with the introduction of a sulfonylamidine side chain at the 20-position of 1. Surprisingly, this modification does not disrupt the inhibitory effect against Topo I and may also prevent lactone ring-opening resulting in stabilization of the closed lactone moiety and contributing to better bioactivity of 1. Further studies including metabolic and pharmacokinetic evaluations, as well as introduction of a sulfonylamidine side chain at the C-7 position of 1, are currently underway to address this supposition.

Conclusions

In summary, a novel series of 20(S)-sulfonylamidine 1-derivatives were designed and synthesized with a key step being a Cu-catalyzed one pot reaction. All 12 derivatives showed comparable or superior cytotoxic activity compared with that of 3. Notably, compound 9a was as potent as 1 and far more potent than 3 against multidrug-resistant KBvin cells. The IC50 values of the new derivatives ranged from 0.026 to 11 μM, indicating that the R1 and R2 groups in the 20-sulfonylamidine side chain could greatly influence the cytotoxic activity of the new 1-derivatives, leading to important SAR information. Also, 9a at 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg demonstrated significant antitumor activity in mice bearing established human HCT116 colorectal adenocarcinoma with no significant changes in body weight at all doses tested. In addition, two of eight and three of eight mice showed complete regression in the 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Histopathological evaluation of acute toxicity against the liver, spleen, lung, and kidney in mice showed no adverse effects of 9a treatment with 300 mg/kg. On the basis of these positive results, further development of 9a-related compounds as potential anticancer clinical trial candidates is definitely warranted.

Experimental Section

Chemistry General Information

N-Boc-amino acids and TFA were purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai) Company. DIPC and DMAP were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (China). Other reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and were used as received. The starting compound 1 was isolated from the Chinese medicinal plant C. acuminata and was purified before being used (>98% pure). Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and preparative thin-layer chromatography (PTLC) were performed with silica gel plates using silica gel 60 GF254 (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Ltd.). Melting points were taken on a Kofler melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were obtained on an NIC-5DX spectrophotometer. MS analyses were performed on ZAB-HS and Bruker Daltonics APEXII49e instruments. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM-400 spectrometer at 400 MHz using TMS as reference (Bruker Company, USA). The purity of all tested compounds was determined by HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1100 series) equipped with a C-18 bound-phase column (Eclipse Plus C18, 5 μM particle size, 4.6 mm × 250 mm). A gradient elution was performed with MeOH and water as a mobile phase and was monitored at 254 nm. All tested compounds were >95% pure.

Synthesis of Key Intermediates 7 and 8

The appropriate N-Boc-amino acid (3.13 mmol) was dissolved in 200 mL of anhydrous CH2Cl2 at rt. To this solution, DIPC (0.5 mL, 3.13 mmol), DMAP (3.13 mmol), and 1 (3.13 mmol) were added at 0 °C.[16] The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and left for 16 h. The solution was then washed with 0.1 N HCl, dried, and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield a white solid, which was recrystallized from MeOH to give a N-Boc-amino acid 1 ester derivative (7) in 56–87% yield. Subsequently, this intermediate (7, 1 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and TFA (10 mL) and stirred at rt for 1 h. The solvent was removed, and the remaining solid was recrystallized from CH2Cl2 and diethyl ether to give the corresponding TFA salt (8) in 57–82% yield.

General Synthetic Procedure for Compounds 9a–91

Triethylamine (1.2 mmol) was added slowly to a suspension of the TFA salt 8 (0.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (35 mL), and this mixture was stirred for 10 min until a clear solution was obtained. Under an N2 atmosphere, alkyne (0.5 mmol), p-toluenesulfonyl azide (0.6 mmol), and CuI (0.05 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2–6 h at rt. After the reaction was completed, as monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was diluted by adding CH2Cl2 (4 mL) and aqueous NH4Cl solution (6 mL). The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min, and two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography on Si gel using CHCl3–MeOH (10:1–20:1) as eluent to give 9a–9l. HPCL chromatograms and conditions for all 12 new compounds (9a–9l) are provided as Supporting Information.

Compound 9a

Yield 52%; mp 129–131 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.59 min (95.4%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3376, 3285, 2932, 1753, 1663, 1612, 1510, 1455, 1401, 1277, 1249, 1144, 1089, 1053, 892, 789, 688, 553; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.39 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, C9–H), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.85 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, C11–H), 7.82 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.68 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.32 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.24 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, -PhOCH3), 6.83 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 5.52 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.17–4.31 (m, 4H, C23, 30-H), 3.73 (s, 3H, -PhOCH3), 2.39 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 0.91 (m, 3H, C19–H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.6, 167.1, 166.8, 159.4, 157.1, 152.2, 148.9, 146.7, 144.8, 131.3, 131.2, 130.8, 129.7, 129.2, 128,4, 128.2, 126.5, 142.4, 140.2, 120.1, 114.9, 95.6, 76.7, 67.2, 55.2, 50.0, 43.3, 38.5, 31.8, 21.5, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C38H34N4O8S: 729.1990 [M + Na]+; found, 729.2002 [M + Na]+.

Compound 9b

Yield 54%; mp132–134 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.33 min (100%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3394, 3339, 3061, 2973, 2926, 1753, 1663, 1614, 1557, 1498, 1453, 1401, 1278, 1232, 1145, 1089, 1054, 985, 813; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.39 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, C9–H), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.82–7.86 (m, 3H, C11–H, Ts-H), 7.68 (t, 1H, C10–H),7.33 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.28–7.32 (m, 3H, Ph-H), 7.23 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ph-H), 5.51 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.20–4.31 (m, 4H, C23, 30-H), 2.39 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.22 (m, 2H, C18–H), 0.91 (m, 3H, C19–H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.6, 166.8, 166.5, 157.2, 152.2, 148.9, 146.4, 144.8, 132.3, 131.2, 130.8, 130.1, 129.7, 129,5, 128.3, 126.5, 142.4, 140.2, 120.2, 95.6, 76.2, 67.2, 50.0, 43.3, 39.3, 31.7, 21.5, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C37H32N4O7S: 677.2064 [M + Na]+; found, 677.2051 [M + Na]+.

Compound 9c

Yield 55%; mp 112–114 °C; tR-HPLC, 2.92 min (96.9%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3371, 3261, 2931, 1751, 1662, 1611, 1548, 1402, 1277, 1249, 1144, 1085, 814, 759, 689; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.38 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.26 (d, 1H, J= 8.8 Hz, C9–H), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.80–7.83 (m, 3H, C11–H, Ts-H), 7.67 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.22 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 6.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 5.50 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.86 (m, 1H, C23–H), 4.23 (s, 2H, C30–H), 3.74 (s, 3H, -PhOCH), 2.39 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 1.47 (m, 3H, l-alanine-CH), 0.91 (m, 3H, C19–H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.8, 166.8, 166.3, 159.4, 157.2, 152.1, 148.9, 146.6, 144.7, 131.4, 131.1, 130.7, 130.5, 129.8, 129.5, 129.1, 128.4, 128.2, 128.0, 126.4, 124.3, 142.2, 140.3, 120.8, 114.8, 95.5, 67.2, 55.2, 50.0, 49.7, 38.6, 31.7, 21.5, 17.4, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C39H36N4O8S: 743.2146 [M + Na]+; found, 743.2157[M + Na]+.

Compound 9d

Yield 57%, 108–110 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.55 min (100%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3395, 3311, 2979, 1755, 1667, 1619, 1541, 1402, 1277, 1231, 1143, 1085, 1058, 813, 755, 702; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.39 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.22 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C9–H), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.80–7.89 (m, 3H, C11–H, Ts-H), 7.69 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.38–7.41 (m, 2H, Ph-H), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.30–7.33 (m, 3H, Ph-H), 7.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 5.51 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz, C17–H), 5.25 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.82 (m, 1H, C-23H), 4.33 (s, 2H, C30–H), 2.40 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 1.44 (d, 3H, l-alanine-CH3), 0.89 (m, 3H, C19–H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.0, 166.7, 165.7, 157.2, 152.2, 148.9, 146.7, 144.6, 132.6, 131.1, 130.7, 130.2, 129.8, 129.5, 129.4, 129.2, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 126.4, 142.2, 140.2, 120.2, 95.3, 67.2, 50.0, 49.9, 39.5, 31.7, 21.5, 17.3, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C38H34N4O7S: 691.2221[M + H]+; found, 691.2206 [M + H]+.

Compound 9e

Yield 55%; mp 118–120 °C; tR-HPLC, 4.40 min (95.2%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3392, 3259, 2931, 1749, 1665, 1615, 1541, 1511, 1401, 1277, 1249, 1142, 1086, 812, 689, 553; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.38 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.20 (d, 1H, J= 8.8 Hz, C9–H), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.82 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.72 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ts-H), 7.66 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.42 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, -PhOCH3), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 5.51 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.6 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.61 (m, 1H, C23–H), 4.33 (s, 2H, C30–H), 3.80 (s, 3H, -PhOCH3), 2.36 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.18–2.20 (m, 3H, C18–H, l-valine-CH(CH3)2), 0.91 (m, 3H, C19–H), 0.74–0.89 (m, 6H, l-valine–CH(CH3)2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 166.9, 166.6, 159.6,157.2, 152.2, 148.9, 146.7, 144.1, 131.7, 131.0, 130.6, 129.8, 129.0, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 126.2, 142.2, 140.2, 120.8, 115.1, 95.5, 76.3, 67.4, 59.2, 55.3, 50.1, 38.8, 31.7, 31.0, 21.4, 17.7, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C41H40N4O8S: 749.2640 [M + H]+; found, 749.2648 [M + H]+.

Compound 9f

Yield 53%; mp 112–114 °C; tR-HPLC, 4.53 min (95.1%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3399, 3263, 2964, 1752, 1666, 1620, 1561, 1534, 1455, 14399, 1277, 1256, 1141, 1085, 992, 806; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.38(s, 1H, C7–H), 8.20 (d, 1H, J= 8.8 Hz, C9–H), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.80 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.73 (d, 2H, Ts-H), 7.66 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.48–7.53 (m, 5H, Ph-H), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz,Ts-H), 5.51 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.60 (m, 1H, C23–H), 4.23 (s, 2H, C30–H), 2.35 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.18–2.20 (m, 3H, C18–H, l-valine-CH(CH3)2), 0.91(m, 3H, C19–H), 0.74–0.89 (m, 6H, l-valine–CH(CH3)2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4, 166.6, 166.3, 157.2, 152.1, 148.9, 146.6, 144.1, 133.0, 131.0, 130.6, 130.4, 129.8, 129.3, 129.0, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 126.4, 140.3, 120.8, 95.5, 67.3, 59.1, 50.0, 39.6, 31.7, 31.0, 21.4, 17.5, 7.4. HRMS calcd for C40H38N4O7S: 719.2534 [M + H]+; found, 719.2517 [M + H]+.

Compound 9g

Yield 54%; mp 130–132 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.78 min (96.2%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3343, 3262, 2966, 2930, 1750, 1660, 1615, 1558, 1459, 1278, 1248, 1148, 1088, 814, 687; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.38 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.22 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C12–H), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C9–H), 7.82 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C11–H), 7.65 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.30 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.25 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.02 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 6.77 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 5.32 (Abq, 2H, J = 17.6 Hz, C17–H), 5.22 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.24–4.29 (m, 3H, C23,C30–H), 3.74 (s, 3H, -PhOCH3), 2.42 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.33 (m, 3H, C18–H, l-leucine-CH2CH(CH3)2), 1.20 (m, 1H, l-leucine-CH2CH(CH3)2), 0.92 (t, 3H, C19–H), 0.85 (m, 6H, l-leucine–CH(CH3)2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 170.6, 167.0, 159.3, 157.0, 152.1, 148.8, 146.6, 145.1, 143.3, 131.1, 131.0, 129.8, 129.6, 129.0, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 126.4, 126.3, 123.9, 142.1, 140.2, 119.9, 114.8, 96.2, 67.1, 55.2, 50.0, 42.1, 40.8, 38.6, 31.7, 24.8, 22.6, 21.5, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C42H42N4O8S: 763.2796 [M + H]+; found, 763.2776 [M + H]+.

Compound 9h

Yield 48%; mp 125–127 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.82 min (97.0%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3391, 3238, 2955, 1754, 1664, 1603, 1542, 1498, 1402, 1279, 1235, 1143, 1086, 1040, 810, 693; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.39 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.29 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C9–H), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.83 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.76 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ts-H), 7.66 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.25–7.20 (m, 3H, Ts-H, Ph-H), 7.14–7.12 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 5.48 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz,C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.88 (m, 1H,C23–H), 4.03–4.36 (m, 2H, C30–H), 2.34 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 1.56–1.79 (m, 2H, l-leucine-CH2CH(CH3)2), 1.48 (m, 1H, l-leucine-CH(CH3)2), 0.93 (m, 3H, C19–H), 0.83–0.93 (m, 6H, l-leucine–CH(CH3)2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.6, 166.9, 166.3, 157.3, 152.1, 148.8, 146.6, 145.1, 132.5, 131.0, 130.0, 129.8, 129.6, 129.4, 129.0, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 126.4, 140.3, 120.1,96.1, 67.2, 52.3, 50.0, 42.1, 40.8, 39.5, 31.7, 24.8, 22.8, 21.5, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C41H40N4O7S: 733.2690 [M + H]+; found, 733.2670[M + H]+.

Compound 9i

Yield 58%; mp 127–129 °C; tR-HPLC, 4.95 min (95.2%). IR(KBr) ν cm–1: 3339, 3259, 2932, 1752, 1666, 1617, 1514, 1459, 1402, 1279, 1250, 1140, 1085, 1038, 896, 753, 677, 553; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.38 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C9–H), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C12–H), 7.81 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.74 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.68 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C10–H), 7.40 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, -PhOCH3), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.03(d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 5.50 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz,C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.66 (m, 1H, C23–H), 4.33 (s, 2H, C30–H), 3.73 (s, 3H, -PhOCH3), 2.39 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 1.92–1.98 (m, 1H, l-isoleucine-CH(CH3)CH2CH3), 0.78–1.26 (m, 11H,C19–H, l-isoleucine-H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.2, 166.6, 166.4, 159.6, 157.2, 152.1, 148.9, 146.7, 144.8, 131.7, 131.0, 129.7, 129.6, 129.0, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0, 126.4, 124.6, 142.4, 140.2, 120.8, 115.1, 95.5, 67.5, 58.3, 55.3, 50.1, 42.1, 38.9, 37.9, 31.8, 24.9, 21.5, 15.0, 11.3, 7.4. HRMS calcd for C42H42N4O8S: 763.2796 [M + H]+; found, 763.2788 [M + H]+.

Compound 9j

Yield 54%; mp 125–127 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.72 min (96.2%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3339, 3258, 2966, 1751, 1666, 1619, 1539, 1454, 1401, 1280, 1258, 1142, 1085, 1051, 989, 693, 553; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.38 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.20 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, C12–H), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C9–H), 7.81 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.67 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.50 (m, 4H,Ts, Ph-H), 7.37 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ph-H), 7.00 (s, 1H, Ph-H), 5.51 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.6 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.66 (m, 1H, C23–H), 4.40 (s, 2H, C30–H), 2.37 (s, 3H, Ts-CH), 1.90–2.23 (m, 3H, C18–H, l-isoleucine-CH(CH3)CH2CH3), 1.14 (m, 2H, l-isoleucine–CH(CH3)CH2CH3), 0.78–0.86 (m, 9H, C19–H, l-isoleucine–CH(CH3)CH2CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz,CDCl3) δ 168.2, 166.6, 166.0, 157.2, 152.2, 148.9, 146.7, 144.0, 133.0, 131.0, 130.6, 130.4, 129.8, 129.0,128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 126.2, 142.2, 140.3, 120.9, 95.5, 67.4, 50.1, 42.2, 39.7, 37.4, 31.8, 24.9, 21.4, 15.0, 11.3, 7.4. HRMS calcd for C41H40N4O7S: 733.2690 [M + H]+; found, 733.2669 [M + H]+.

Compound 9k

Yield 52%; m.p.102–104 °C; tR-HPLC, 5.36 min (96.4%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3385, 3262, 2929, 1750, 1663, 1611, 1544, 1451, 1280, 1246, 1144, 1048, 812, 757, 693, 552; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.39 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.22 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C9–H), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.82 (m, 3H, C11–H, Ts-H), 7.67 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.21 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.17–7.15 (m, 3H, l-phenylalanine-Ph), 7.10 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, -PhOCH3), 6.99–7.02 (m, 2H, l-phenylalanine-Ph), 6.89 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, -PhOCH3), 5.50 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.91 (m, 1H, C23–H), 4.23 (s, 2H, C30–H), 3.78 (s, 3H, -PhOCH3), 3.12–3.06 (m, 2H, l-phenylalanine-CH), 2.39 (s, 3H, Ts-CH3), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 0.81 (m, 3H, C19–H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.0, 166.7, 166.4, 159.4, 157.2, 152.2, 148.9, 146.2, 144.3, 134.8, 131.5, 131.0, 129.8, 129.4, 129.1, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 127.2, 126.4,124.0, 142.2, 140.3, 120.5, 114.9, 95.9, 67.2, 55.3, 54.9, 50.1, 38.7, 36.6, 32.0, 21.4, 7.4. HRMS calcd for C45H40N4O8S: 797.2640 [M + H]+; found, 797.2661 [M + H]+.

Compound 9l

Yield 35%; mp 123–125 °C; tR-HPLC, 3.20 min (100%). IR (KBr) ν cm–1: 3419, 3269, 2925, 1751, 1644, 1601, 1540, 1401, 1277, 1236, 1139, 1087, 1050, 814, 758, 699, 552; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.45 (s, 1H, C7–H), 8.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, C9–H), 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, C12–H), 7.87 (t, 1H, C11–H), 7.71 (t, 1H, C10–H), 7.65 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ts-H), 7.36 (s, 1H, C14–H), 7.22 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Ts-H), 7.17–7.20 (m, 5H, l-phenylalanine-Ph), 5.52 (ABq, 2H, J = 17.2 Hz, C17–H), 5.26 (s, 2H, C5–H), 4.91(m, 1H, C-23H), 4.11 (m, 2H, -CH2OH), 3.14–3.23 (m, 2H, l-phenylalanine-CH), 2.39 (s, 3H, Ts-CH), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, C18–H), 0.91 (m, 3H, C19–H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.7, 166.6, 166.5, 157.1, 152.1, 148.1, 145.8, 144.4, 135.1, 132.1, 131.3, 129.5, 129.4, 129.1, 129.0, 128.8, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 127.2, 126.4, 140.2, 121.0, 96.4, 67.2, 58.9, 56.1, 50.1, 37.5, 35.6, 32.0, 21.4, 7.5. HRMS calcd for C39H36N4O8S 743.2146 [M + Na]+; found, 743.2158 [M + Na]+.

Cell Lines and Cytotoxicity Assay

The human tumor cell lines used in this work were A-549 (lung carcinoma), DU-145 (hormone-insensitive prostate cancer), KB (originally isolated from epidermoid carcinoma of the nasopharynx), KBvin (vincristine-resistant KB subline), and HCT116 (colorectal adenocarcinoma). These cell lines were obtained from the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (UNC-CH) or from ATCC (Manassas, VA), except KBvin, which was a generous gift from Professor Y.-C. Cheng (Yale University). All cell lines were maintained and assayed in RPMI-1640 medium containing 2 mM l-glutamine and 25 mM HEPES (HyClone), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone), 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B (Cellgro) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in air. Compound stock solutions were prepared at 10 mM in DMSO and diluted with culture medium with the final DMSO concentration ≤0.01% (v/v), a concentration without effect on cell growth. The 4–6 × 103 cells/well were cultured for 72 h with various concentrations of test compounds in 96-well plates at 37 °C. The antiproliferative activities of compounds were determined by a sulforhodamine B assay according to the procedures developed and validated at NCI[30] and are expressed as IC50 (μM) values, which reduced the cell number by 50% compared with that of the vehicle control after 72 h of continuous treatment. Each assay was performed in triplicate with duplicated samples.

Morphological Observation

Morphological changes of culture cells were observed under a phase contrast microscope and photographed with a digital camera (Nikon, Japan).

Apoptosis Assessment

Apoptosis was detected by an Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide double staining kit (BD Biosciences). A-549 cells were treated with 9a for 24 or 48 h. Cells were harvested by trypsinization and washed with ice-cold PBS. Cells were labeled with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Labeled cells were analyzed by an FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

Cell Cycle Analysis

A-549 cells were fixed with ice-cold 70% EtOH followed by propidium iodide staining. Samples were analyzed by a flow cytometer for cell cycle determination. Population of each cell cycle phase was calculated based on the ploidy (<2N as sub-G1; 2N as G1; between 2N and 4N as S; and 4N as G2/M) and evaluated statistically by Student’s t-test (P < 0.01).

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were harvested in PBS containing proteinase inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors, and sonicated. Whole cell lysates were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred to Immobilon P membrane (EMD Millipore). The membrane was incubated with primary antibody followed by labeling with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (EMD Millipore). A chemilluminence substrate kit (EMD Millipore) was used for the detection of membrane-bound HRP and visualized by a luminsence image analyzer, LAS4000 (Fuji Photo Film Co., Japan).

Antibodies

Antibodies to caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9, PARP, phospho-ATM (Ser1981), ATM, phospho-ATR (Ser428), phospho-Chk1 (Ser345), phospho-Chk2 (Thr68), Chk2, phospho-H2AX (Ser139), and phospho-p53 (Ser15) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies against ATM, ATR, Chk1, and PUMA were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies against Topo I, Topo IIα, Topo IIβ, p53, FADD, BAX, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-2 were from BD Biosciences. Antibody to β-actin was purchased from EMD Millipore.

Topoisomerase I Activity Assay in a Cell-Free System

One unit of recombinant human topoisomerase I enzyme (TopoGEN) was preincubated for 20 min at 37 °C with vehicle, 9a, 1, 3, or SN-38 in a final volume of 20 μL of reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% BSA, 0.1 mM spermidine, and 5% glycerol) was then incubated with 250 ng of supercoiled plasmid DNA for 20 min. The supercoiled, relaxed, or nicked DNA was separated by 1% agarose gel in 1× TAE (Tris-Acetate-EDTA) buffer. Ethidium bromide stained agarose gel was photographed using Gel Doc XR (Bio-Rad).

Topoisomerase I Activity Assay

The Topo I activity test was performed using an assay kit (TopoGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Nuclear extracts from 9a-treated A-549 cells were incubated with supercoiled DNA (for Topo I) or catenated kDNA (for Topo II) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction mixture was separated by 1% agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and photographed using Gel Doc XR (Bio-Rad).

Xenograft Model Antitumor Assay

Five- to six-week-old female nu/nu mice (National Laboratory Animal Center, Taiwan) were inoculated subcutaneously with 2 × 106 human colorectal adenocarcinoma HCT116 cells in the flank. When the grafted tumor volume reached the average volume of 200 mm3, mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8). The treatment regimen is shown in Table 2. Vehicle control and compound 9a at 5 or 10 mg/kg were administered i.v. once a day (QD) for 7 days and then i.p. once a day to the end. As an experimental control group, 100 mg/kg of compound 3 was administered i.v. once a week (QWK) to the end. The length (L) and width (W) of the graft was measured every 3 to 4 days to the end, and the tumor volume was calculated as LW2/2. Results were evaluated statistically by Student’s t-test. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Taiwan University (Taipei, Taiwan) and was performed according to the institutional guidelines.

Pathological Evaluation of in Vivo Toxicity

Sixty 8-week-old male BALB/c mice (National Laboratory Animal Center, Taipei, Taiwan) were used to evaluate single-dose toxicity. Mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) and received a single i.p. injection of 9a at 0 (vehicle), 30, 100, 200, or 300 mg/kg on day 0. One group was untreated as the normal control. Body weight was measured every 3 days for 15 days. At the end of experimental period, all animals were euthanized by CO2, and tissues from the liver, lung, kidney, and spleen were weighed (data not shown). Tissues were fixed with 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections 3–5 μm in thickness were prepared for histopathological examination. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained paraffin sections were evaluated histopathologically according to the guideline described by Shackelford et al.,[36] and the symptomatic lesions were graded. The degree of lesions were graded from one to five depending on severity as follows: nothing significant, 1 = minimal (<1%), 2 = slight (1–25%), 3 = moderate (26–50%), 4 = moderately severe (51–75%), and 5 = severe/high (76–100%). Statistically significant results (P < 0.05) were shown. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of China Medical University (Taichung, Taiwan) and was performed according to the institutional guidelines.
  32 in total

1.  Novel camptothecin derivatives. Part 1: oxyalkanoic acid esters of camptothecin and their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity.

Authors:  Li-Xi Yang; Xiandao Pan; Hui-Juan Wang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Camptothecin delivery methods.

Authors:  A Hatefi; B Amsden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Transition metal-catalyzed N-arylations of amidines and guanidines.

Authors:  Tom R M Rauws; Bert U W Maes
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Transcription-dependent degradation of topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complexes.

Authors:  Shyamal D Desai; Hui Zhang; Alexandra Rodriguez-Bauman; Jin-Ming Yang; Xiaohua Wu; Murugesan K Gounder; Eric H Rubin; Leroy F Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening.

Authors:  P Skehan; R Storeng; D Scudiero; A Monks; J McMahon; D Vistica; J T Warren; H Bokesch; S Kenney; M R Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  A kinetic and mechanistic study of the hydrolysis of camptothecin and some analogues.

Authors:  J Fassberg; V J Stella
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Antitumor activity of 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothec in, a novel water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, against murine tumors.

Authors:  T Kunimoto; K Nitta; T Tanaka; N Uehara; H Baba; M Takeuchi; T Yokokura; S Sawada; T Miyasaka; M Mutai
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I.

Authors:  Y H Hsiang; R Hertzberg; S Hecht; L F Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Sulfonamides and sulfonylated derivatives as anticancer agents.

Authors:  Angela Casini; Andrea Scozzafava; Antonio Mastrolorenzo; Laudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.428

10.  Camptothecin and taxol: historic achievements in natural products research.

Authors:  Nicholas H Oberlies; David J Kroll
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.050

View more
  11 in total

1.  Design and synthesis of novel spin-labeled camptothecin derivatives as potent cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Zhao; Dan Wu; Mei-Juan Wang; Masuo Goto; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Ying-Qian Liu; Xiao-Bing Wu; Zi-Long Song; Gao-Xiang Zhu; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.

Authors:  Cheng-Jie Yang; Zi-Long Song; Masuo Goto; Pei-Ling Hsu; Xiao-Shuai Zhang; Qian-Ru Yang; Ying-Qian Liu; Mei-Juan Wang; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Xiao-Fei Shang; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Synthesis, antitumor activity, and mechanism of action of 6-acrylic phenethyl ester-2-pyranone derivatives.

Authors:  Sai Fang; Lei Chen; Miao Yu; Bao Cheng; Yongsheng Lin; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Qiong Gu; Jun Xu
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  Perspectives on biologically active camptothecin derivatives.

Authors:  Ying-Qian Liu; Wen-Qun Li; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Keduo Qian; Liu Yang; Gao-Xiang Zhu; Xiao-Bing Wu; An-Liang Chen; Shao-Yong Zhang; Xiang Nan; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 12.944

5.  Design and synthesis of novel PEG-conjugated 20(S)-camptothecin sulfonylamidine derivatives with potent in vitro antitumor activity via Cu-catalyzed three-component reaction.

Authors:  Zi-Long Song; Hai-Le Chen; Yu-Han Wang; Masuo Goto; Wen-Jing Gao; Pi-Le Cheng; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Ying-Qian Liu; Gao-Xiang Zhu; Mei-Juan Wang; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Design, synthesis, cytotoxic activity and molecular docking studies of new 20(S)-sulfonylamidine camptothecin derivatives.

Authors:  Zi-Long Song; Mei-Juan Wang; Lanlan Li; Dan Wu; Yu-Han Wang; Li-Ting Yan; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Ying-Qian Liu; Yong-Long Zhao; Chih-Ya Wang; Huanxiang Liu; Masuo Goto; Heng Liu; Gao-Xiang Zhu; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Transition metal- and catalyst-free one-pot green method for the synthesis of N-sulfonyl amidines via direct reaction of sulfonyl azides with amines.

Authors:  Babak Kaboudin; Saeed Torabi; Foad Kazemi; Hiroshi Aoyama
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Mild Reductive Functionalization of Amides into N-Sulfonylformamidines.

Authors:  Paz Trillo; Tove Slagbrand; Fredrik Tinnis; Hans Adolfsson
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.911

9.  Development of an enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay for camptothecin.

Authors:  Liting Yan; Xiang Nan; Cunzheng Zhang; Haifang Wang; Xiaoyan Huang; Jun Hu; Yingqian Liu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.952

10.  Novel bivalent securinine mimetics as topoisomerase I inhibitors.

Authors:  Wen Hou; Hui Lin; Zhen-Ya Wang; Martin G Banwell; Ting Zeng; Ping-Hua Sun; Jing Lin; Wei-Min Chen
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.