Literature DB >> 25003439

Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy: Patient Satisfaction and Decision Making.

Sally K Ng1, Rowena M Hare, Ronny J Kuang, Katrina M Smith, Belinda J Brown, David J Hunter-Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although breast reconstruction has been shown to improve psychological, physical, and sexual well-being, Australia still has one of the lowest reconstruction rates among well-developed countries. This study explores both the quality-of-life benefits of reconstruction and the factors that influence patients' decisions of whether or not to undergo reconstruction.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study (296 consecutive mastectomy patients from 2000 to 2010) uses an internationally validated questionnaire (BREAST-Q) to evaluate patients' satisfaction with or without breast reconstruction. In addition, we analyzed factors that influence patients' decisions of whether to undergo reconstruction.
RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen patients responded (74%) and of the 143 patients who elected to participate, 79 were in the "reconstruction group" and 64 in the "no-reconstruction group" post mastectomy. Patient demographics and cancer variables of the 2 groups were matched with the exception of age (reconstruction group 9.7 years younger: P < 0.01). The reconstruction group showed statistically significantly higher BREAST-Q scores with regard to satisfaction with the breast (P < 0.0001), psychological well-being (P = 0.0068), and sexual well-being (P = 0.0001). For the reconstruction group, the main reasons for undergoing reconstruction included improved self-image, more clothing choices, and the feeling of overcoming the cancer. One third of non-reconstructed patients still feared that reconstruction would mask cancer recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the positive effects of breast reconstruction post mastectomy and identifies reasons that influence patients' decisions of whether to undergo reconstruction. Breast reconstruction should be seen as an integral part in the comprehensive care of women with breast cancer and an important health care priority in Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25003439     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  32 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Current strategies with 2-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Christin Harless; Steven R Jacobson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

3.  Different procedures should be on offer.

Authors:  Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp; Thomas Kremer; Ulrich Kneser; Jörg Heil; Christof Sohn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Z Cordova; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08

Review 6.  Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care.

Authors:  Mirelle Lagendijk; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christopher Gibbons; Andrea Pusic; Laura S Dominici
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 7.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

9.  Stability of Long-Term Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 12-Year Surgeon- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in 3489 Nonirradiated and Irradiated Implants.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The Evolution of Breast Satisfaction and Well-Being after Breast Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparison to the Norm.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Laura H Rosenberger; Christel N Rushing; Dunya Atisha; Andrea L Pusic; Scott T Hollenbeck; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.