Literature DB >> 25003287

Transanal minimally invasive surgery: initial experience and short-term functional results.

Anandi H W Schiphorst1, Barbara S Langenhoff, John Maring, Apollo Pronk, David D E Zimmerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, the preferred method for local excision of rectal polyps is transanal endoscopic microsurgery, avoiding rectal resection. Transanal minimally invasive surgery is a relatively new technique using a disposable port in combination with conventional laparoscopic instruments. This method is less expensive as compared with transanal endoscopic microsurgery, relatively easy to learn, and available. Despite wide adoption of transanal minimally invasive surgery, to date only a few series on the implementation and use of this technique are reported, and detailed information on the effect of transanal minimally invasive surgery on fecal continence is not available.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to prospectively assess the functional outcome after transanal minimally invasive surgery using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index preoperatively and postoperatively.
DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients included those who underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery between October 2011 and September 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Transanal minimally invasive surgery was studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured postoperative surgical and functional results.
RESULTS: A total of 37 patients underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery during our study period. Short-term morbidity rate was 14%, and positive resection margins were reported in 6 cases (16%); in 1 of these patients, a local recurrence was observed. Overall, there was a significant decline in preoperative and postoperative Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores (p = 0.02), indicating an improvement in anorectal function after transanal minimally invasive surgery for patients with impaired preoperative continence. Seventeen patients (49%) had impaired continence before transanal minimally invasive surgery (mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score = 21). Continence improved in 15 (88%) of these patients after surgery; no change was observed in 1 patient (6%), and continence further decreased in another. In addition, 18 patients (51%) had normal preoperative continence (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score = 0), of which 83% had no change in functionality, and continence decreased in 3. LIMITATIONS: No quality of life was measured.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term functional results of transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps are excellent and comparable to functional results using the dedicated transanal endoscopic microsurgery equipment. More research on outcome after transanal minimally invasive surgery is needed to assess morbidity rates and oncologic clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25003287     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  The effect of proctoring on the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; J Stijns; H Pottel; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Earl V Thompson; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

Review 3.  [Minimally invasive approaches for transanal surgery].

Authors:  W Kneist
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery approach for rectal GIST.

Authors:  J Pintor-Tortolero; J C García; R Cantero
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution.

Authors:  Franco G Marinello; Anna Curell; Ingrid Tapiolas; Gianluca Pellino; Francesc Vallribera; Eloy Espin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery and Healthy Control Subjects.

Authors:  Stefan H E M Clermonts; Yu-Ting van Loon; Dareczka K Wasowicz; Barbara S Langenhoff; David D E Zimmerman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Surveillance Intensity Comparison by Risk for T1NX Locally Excised Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a Cost-Effective Analysis.

Authors:  Mason McCain; Yohanis O'Neill; Hernan Hernandez; Ryan Foley; Brian M Sadowski; Zachary Torgersen; Jennifer Beaty; Ruben Rojas Payacan; Charles A Ternent
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Salvage TME following TEM: a possible indication for TaTME.

Authors:  F Letarte; M Raval; A Karimuddin; P T Phang; C J Brown
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; A H W Schiphorst; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Luis J García-Flórez; Jorge L Otero-Díez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.