Literature DB >> 2500281

Towards an understanding of position effect variegation.

K D Tartof1, C Bishop, M Jones, C A Hobbs, J Locke.   

Abstract

Most variegating position effects are a consequence of placing a euchromatic gene adjacent to alpha-heterochromatin. In such rearrangements, the affected locus is inactivated in some cells, but not others, thereby giving rise to a mosaic tissue of mutant and wild-type cells. A detailed examination of the molecular structure of three variegating white mottled mutations of Drosophila melanogaster, all of which are inversions of the X chromosome, reveals that their euchromatic breakpoints are clustered and located approximately 25 kb downstream of the white promoter and that the heterochromatic sequences to which the white locus is adjoined are transposons. An analysis of three revertants of the wm4 mutation, created by relocating white to another euchromatic site, demonstrates that they also carry some heterochromatically derived sequences with them upon restoration of the wild-type phenotype. This suggests that variegation is not controlled from a heterochromatic sequence immediately adjacent to the variegating gene but rather from some site more internal to the heterochromatic domain itself. As a consequence of this observation we have proposed a boundary model for understanding how heterochromatic domains may be formed. It has been recognized for many years that the phenotype of variegating position effects may be altered by the presence of trans-acting dominant mutations that act to either enhance or suppress variegation. Using P-element mutagenesis, we have induced and examined 12 dominant enhancers of variegation that represent four loci on the second and third chromosomes. Most of these mutations are cytologically visible duplications or deficiencies. They exert their dominant effects through changes in the copy number of wild-type genes and can be divided into two reciprocally acting classes. Class I modifiers are genes that act as enhancers of variegation when duplicated and as suppressors when mutated or deficient. Conversely, class II modifiers are genes that enhance when mutated or deleted and suppress when duplicated. The available data indicate that, in Drosophila, there are 20-30 loci capable of dominantly modifying variegation. Of these, most appear to be of the class I type whereas only two class II modifiers have been identified so far.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2500281     DOI: 10.1002/dvg.1020100306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genet        ISSN: 0192-253X


  31 in total

1.  Evidence for intrinsic differences in the formation of chromatin domains in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C P Bishop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mutation in a heterochromatin-specific chromosomal protein is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J C Eissenberg; T C James; D M Foster-Hartnett; T Hartnett; V Ngan; S C Elgin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Conserved domains control heterochromatin localization and silencing properties of SU(VAR)3-7.

Authors:  Yannis Jaquet; Marion Delattre; Juan Montoya-Burgos; Anne Spierer; Pierre Spierer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Mutation-selection balance and metabolic control theory.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Copy number and orientation determine the susceptibility of a gene to silencing by nearby heterochromatin in Drosophila.

Authors:  J F Sabl; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Molecular structure of frizzled, a Drosophila tissue polarity gene.

Authors:  P N Adler; C Vinson; W J Park; S Conover; L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Transgene repeat arrays interact with distant heterochromatin and cause silencing in cis and trans.

Authors:  D R Dorer; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A reexamination of spreading of position-effect variegation in the white-roughest region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P B Talbert; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The dose of a putative ubiquitin-specific protease affects position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Henchoz; F De Rubertis; D Pauli; P Spierer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  A complex network of regulatory elements in Ikaros and their activity during hemo-lymphopoiesis.

Authors:  Christoph Kaufmann; Toshimi Yoshida; Elizabeth A Perotti; Esther Landhuis; Paul Wu; Katia Georgopoulos
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.