Literature DB >> 25002470

A simple generative model of collective online behavior.

James P Gleeson1, Davide Cellai2, Jukka-Pekka Onnela3, Mason A Porter4, Felix Reed-Tsochas5.   

Abstract

Human activities increasingly take place in online environments, providing novel opportunities for relating individual behaviors to population-level outcomes. In this paper, we introduce a simple generative model for the collective behavior of millions of social networking site users who are deciding between different software applications. Our model incorporates two distinct mechanisms: one is associated with recent decisions of users, and the other reflects the cumulative popularity of each application. Importantly, although various combinations of the two mechanisms yield long-time behavior that is consistent with data, the only models that reproduce the observed temporal dynamics are those that strongly emphasize the recent popularity of applications over their cumulative popularity. This demonstrates--even when using purely observational data without experimental design--that temporal data-driven modeling can effectively distinguish between competing microscopic mechanisms, allowing us to uncover previously unidentified aspects of collective online behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  branching processes; complex systems

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002470      PMCID: PMC4115507          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313895111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sandpile on scale-free networks.

Authors:  K-I Goh; D-S Lee; B Kahng; D Kim
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.

Authors:  Sinan Aral; Dylan Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging.

Authors:  Ciro Cattuto; Vittorio Loreto; Luciano Pietronero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Quantifying long-term scientific impact.

Authors:  Dashun Wang; Chaoming Song; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Competition-induced criticality in a model of meme popularity.

Authors:  James P Gleeson; Jonathan A Ward; Kevin P O'Sullivan; William T Lee
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.

Authors:  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

9.  Social science. Computational social science.

Authors:  David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-Laszlo Barabasi; Devon Brewer; Nicholas Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James Fowler; Myron Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall Van Alstyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network.

Authors:  Sandra González-Bailón; Javier Borge-Holthoefer; Alejandro Rivero; Yamir Moreno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cross-correlations of American baby names.

Authors:  Paolo Barucca; Jacopo Rocchi; Enzo Marinari; Giorgio Parisi; Federico Ricci-Tersenghi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Coevolution spreading in complex networks.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Quan-Hui Liu; Junhao Liang; Yanqing Hu; Tao Zhou
Journal:  Phys Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 25.600

3.  Digital Ecology: Coexistence and Domination among Interacting Networks.

Authors:  Kaj-Kolja Kleineberg; Marián Boguñá
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dynamics and biases of online attention: the case of aircraft crashes.

Authors:  Ruth García-Gavilanes; Milena Tsvetkova; Taha Yasseri
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Evidence for complex contagion models of social contagion from observational data.

Authors:  Daniel A Sprague; Thomas House
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Uncovering and Predicting the Dynamic Process of Collective Attention with Survival Theory.

Authors:  Peng Bao; Xiaoxia Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Global information and mobility support coordination among humans.

Authors:  Alberto Antonioni; Angel Sanchez; Marco Tomassini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Suppressing disease spreading by using information diffusion on multiplex networks.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Quan-Hui Liu; Shi-Min Cai; Ming Tang; Lidia A Braunstein; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The origin of the criticality in meme popularity distribution on complex networks.

Authors:  Yup Kim; Seokjong Park; Soon-Hyung Yook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Users' participation and social influence during information spreading on Twitter.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Ding-Ding Han; Ruiqi Yang; Ziqiao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.