Literature DB >> 22722253

Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.

Sinan Aral1, Dylan Walker.   

Abstract

Identifying social influence in networks is critical to understanding how behaviors spread. We present a method that uses in vivo randomized experimentation to identify influence and susceptibility in networks while avoiding the biases inherent in traditional estimates of social contagion. Estimation in a representative sample of 1.3 million Facebook users showed that younger users are more susceptible to influence than older users, men are more influential than women, women influence men more than they influence other women, and married individuals are the least susceptible to influence in the decision to adopt the product offered. Analysis of influence and susceptibility together with network structure revealed that influential individuals are less susceptible to influence than noninfluential individuals and that they cluster in the network while susceptible individuals do not, which suggests that influential people with influential friends may be instrumental in the spread of this product in the network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722253     DOI: 10.1126/science.1215842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  90 in total

1.  Adoption of a High-Impact Innovation in a Homogeneous Population.

Authors:  Curtis H Weiss; Julia Poncela-Casasnovas; Joshua I Glaser; Adam R Pah; Stephen D Persell; David W Baker; Richard G Wunderink; Luís A Nunes Amaral
Journal:  Phys Rev X       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 15.762

Review 2.  Using Social Networks to Understand and Overcome Implementation Barriers in the Global HIV Response.

Authors:  Guy Harling; Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Efficient discovery of overlapping communities in massive networks.

Authors:  Prem K Gopalan; David M Blei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics.

Authors:  Tuan Q Phan; Edoardo M Airoldi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls.

Authors:  William Minozzi; Michael A Neblo; Kevin M Esterling; David M J Lazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Local structure can identify and quantify influential global spreaders in large scale social networks.

Authors:  Yanqing Hu; Shenggong Ji; Yuliang Jin; Ling Feng; H Eugene Stanley; Shlomo Havlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Social science: Poked to vote.

Authors:  Sinan Aral
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Limits of social mobilization.

Authors:  Alex Rutherford; Manuel Cebrian; Sohan Dsouza; Esteban Moro; Alex Pentland; Iyad Rahwan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19.

Authors:  David Holtz; Michael Zhao; Seth G Benzell; Cathy Y Cao; Mohammad Amin Rahimian; Jeremy Yang; Jennifer Allen; Avinash Collis; Alex Moehring; Tara Sowrirajan; Dipayan Ghosh; Yunhao Zhang; Paramveer S Dhillon; Christos Nicolaides; Dean Eckles; Sinan Aral
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Inducing peer pressure to promote cooperation.

Authors:  Ankur Mani; Iyad Rahwan; Alex Pentland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.