Literature DB >> 25002217

What is the role of mental health in primary total knee arthroplasty?

Carlos J Lavernia1, Jesus M Villa, David A Iacobelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological distress has been associated with inferior scores for pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its relationships with scores and arthrofibrosis after TKA remain unclear. QUESTION/PURPOSES: The objectives of this study were (1) to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Knee Society (KS) scores, of those patients who developed arthrofibrosis and underwent manipulation and compare them with a control group; and (2) in patients with arthrofibrosis who underwent manipulation, to determine PROs and KS scores of those with psychological distress and those without it.
METHODS: During a 17-year period (August 1992 to October 2009), a total of 1952 TKAs were performed and included in our prospectively collected joint registry database; 1248 procedures had a postoperative followup of at least 2 years (mean, 5 years; range, 2-16 years). Among them, 57 knees (53 patients) developed arthrofibrosis and underwent manipulation under anesthesia after the index procedure. This group was compared with a matched group (by age, sex, race, and ethnicity) of 63 knees (58 patients) without arthrofibrosis. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative Quality of Well-Being scale (QWB-7), SF-36, WOMAC, and The KS knee and function scores were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with <52 points on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary subscale were considered in psychological distress for all comparisons. Active knee flexion and KS range of motion (ROM) were used as objective motion measures. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 5 years; range, 2-16 years).
RESULTS: Patients who developed arthrofibrosis had worse KS function scores before TKA than did patients in the nonarthrofibrosis control group (mean 27, SD 20.5 versus 37, SD 19.3; p=0.006). Patients with arthrofibrosis and psychological distress, before TKA and when compared with patients with arthrofibrosis but without distress, had worse QWB-7 (0.490 versus 0.547; p<0.001) and worse WOMAC stiffness (4.92, versus 3.22; p=0.005), respectively. Postoperatively, patients with arthrofibrosis and distress also had worse QWB-7 (0.537 versus 0.627; p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with arthrofibrosis and psychological distress perceived themselves preoperatively as having worse knee and overall health status than those with arthrofibrosis but without distress. In view of this, expectations after TKA should be particularly addressed in those patients with poor function and psychological distress. Further investigations, making use of tools specifically designed to ascertain depression, are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25002217      PMCID: PMC4390930          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3769-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review.

Authors:  Patricia H Rosenberger; Peter Jokl; Jeannette Ickovics
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Construct validation of the USA-Spanish version of the SF-36 health survey in a Cuban-American population with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  R Arocho; C A McMillan; P Sutton-Wallace
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Range of motion in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; M McShane; F Kelly; J Elting; J Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Paul A Dieppe; L Stefan Lohmander
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Psychological attributes of preoperative total joint replacement patients: implications for optimal physical outcome.

Authors:  David C Ayers; Patricia D Franklin; Paula M Trief; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Deborah Freund
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lingard; Jeffrey N Katz; Elizabeth A Wright; Clement B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The Quality of Well-being Scale. Applications in AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and arthritis.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; J P Anderson; A W Wu; W C Mathews; F Kozin; D Orenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Impact of psychological distress on pain and function following knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lingard; Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effect of Marital Status on Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ran Schwarzkopf; Vivek Singh; Benjamin Fiedler; David N Kugelman; Morteza Meftah; Vinay K Aggarwal
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Editorial-Measuring Satisfaction: Can It Be Done?

Authors:  David Ring; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: High Rates of Interest in Sex in Patients With Hip Arthritis.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Common Is Back Pain and What Biopsychosocial Factors Are Associated With Back Pain in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Editorial: indications--on the fringes and in the mainstream.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Preoperative Mental Health Has a Stronger Association with Baseline Self-Assessed Knee Scores than Defect Morphology in Patients Undergoing Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Jakob Ackermann; Takahiro Ogura; Robert A Duerr; Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Depressed patients feel more pain in the short term after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raúl Torres-Claramunt; Pedro Hinarejos; Jorge Amestoy; Joan Leal; Juan Sánchez-Soler; Lluís Puig-Verdié; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Manipulation under anesthesia as a therapy option for postoperative knee stiffness: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Daiwei Yao; Frederik Bruns; Sarah Ettinger; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Christian Plaass; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Leif Claassen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Influence of Psychological Distress in Patients with Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty. Treatment Algorithm for Patients with Metal Allergy and Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Pilar Peña; Miguel A Ortega; Julia Buján; Basilio De la Torre
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  What Influences Patient Satisfaction after TKA? A Qualitative Investigation.

Authors:  Nardia-Rose Klem; Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Michelle M Dowsey; Robert Schütze; Peter Kent; Peter F Choong; Samantha Bunzli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.