Literature DB >> 17545417

Impact of psychological distress on pain and function following knee arthroplasty.

Elizabeth A Lingard1, Daniel L Riddle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative psychological distress has been reported to be an important risk factor for poor outcome following lower-extremity arthroplasty. We determined the independent impact of preoperative psychological distress on three, twelve, and twenty-four-month WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) pain and function scores and on change scores over those time periods.
METHODS: Data were obtained from an international group of 952 patients in thirteen centers participating in the Kinemax Outcomes Study. Patients completed the WOMAC and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires. The mental health (MH) scale of the SF-36 was used to quantify the impact of psychological distress on WOMAC pain and function scores. We also dichotomized patients into groups with and without psychological distress on the basis of evidence-based cut-points. Repeated-measures models were used to derive mean preoperative and three, twelve, and twenty-four-month WOMAC pain and function scores and general linear models were used to derive change scores for patients with and without psychological distress after adjustment for covariates.
RESULTS: Psychological distress, when examined on a continuous scale, was found to predict pain and function at all time-points. WOMAC pain scores for psychologically distressed patients were 3 to 5 points lower, depending on the time-frame, than the scores for the non-distressed patients, after adjustment for covariates. WOMAC function scores did not differ significantly between the two groups following surgery. The changes in the WOMAC pain and function scores for the psychologically distressed patients were not significantly different from those for the non-distressed patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with psychological distress demonstrate a substantial decrease in that distress following surgery. Patients who are distressed have slightly worse pain preoperatively and for up to two years following knee arthroplasty as compared with patients with no psychological distress. With the exception of preoperative scores, these differences are not likely to be measurable at the individual patient level. WOMAC pain and function change scores do not differ between patients with and without distress after adjustment for covariates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17545417     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  72 in total

1.  The role of emotional health in functional outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: extending the biopsychosocial model to orthopaedics: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  David C Ayers; Patricia D Franklin; David C Ring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Carl Döring; Andreas Denecke; Mathias Brosz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Predictors of pain medication use for arthroplasty pain after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Influence of fatigue on construction workers' physical and cognitive function.

Authors:  M Zhang; L A Murphy; D Fang; A J Caban-Martinez
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Preoperative predictors of postoperative opioid usage, pain scores, and referral to a pain management service in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Trevor R Banka; Allison Ruel; Kara Fields; Jacques YaDeau; Geoffrey Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-11-01

7.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: an Asian perspective.

Authors:  Matthew Dhanaraj Thambiah; Sahaya Nathan; Branden Z X Seow; Shen Liang; Krishna Lingaraj
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Medical and psychological comorbidity predicts poor pain outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Effect of comorbidity on quality of life of male veterans with prevalent primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.