| Literature DB >> 25001609 |
Elizabeth Bonawitz1, Stephanie Denison2, Thomas L Griffiths3, Alison Gopnik3.
Abstract
Although probabilistic models of cognitive development have become increasingly prevalent, one challenge is to account for how children might cope with a potentially vast number of possible hypotheses. We propose that children might address this problem by 'sampling' hypotheses from a probability distribution. We discuss empirical results demonstrating signatures of sampling, which offer an explanation for the variability of children's responses. The sampling hypothesis provides an algorithmic account of how children might address computationally intractable problems and suggests a way to make sense of their 'noisy' behavior.Entities:
Keywords: approximate Bayesian inference; causal learning; cognitive development; sampling hypothesis
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25001609 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Cogn Sci ISSN: 1364-6613 Impact factor: 20.229