INTRODUCTION: Mentorship is a critical element of capacity-building for health research as it can support career counseling, promote interest in health research and build professional networks. Few studies of mentorship have taken place in low- and middle-income countries. This paper explores the mentorship dimension of the Fogarty International Center's (FIC) support to research training in Kenya and Uganda. METHODS: This exploratory study documents the nature of mentoring that occurred within FIC programs, considers the outcomes of mentoring, and the strengths and weaknesses of FIC trainee mentorship during and after training. Two case studies were conducted, at the University of Nairobi in Kenya and Makerere University in Uganda. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with former trainees, principal investigators and institutional leaders, exploring their perceptions of mentoring and its effects. RESULTS: Mentoring aspects of FIC programs were highly valued. Respondents felt that following formal training in the US there was much still to learn about conducting research, and mentoring relationships provided support in applying for and implementing research grants. Mentoring arrangements were initially with US collaborators, but over time relationships with senior African colleagues became critical, particularly in terms of navigating university administrative systems. Mentees were typically highly motivated to pass their skills on to others, and became eager mentors later in their careers. A minority of respondents raised concerns about directive approaches to mentorship that reflect more hierarchical rather than egalitarian approaches. DISCUSSION: Mentorship during and after FIC research training programs, while largely informal in nature, appears to have very positive impacts upon career development and inclination to remain in health research. Local African mentors often play a critical mentorship role, and their contributions should be better recognized.
INTRODUCTION: Mentorship is a critical element of capacity-building for health research as it can support career counseling, promote interest in health research and build professional networks. Few studies of mentorship have taken place in low- and middle-income countries. This paper explores the mentorship dimension of the Fogarty International Center's (FIC) support to research training in Kenya and Uganda. METHODS: This exploratory study documents the nature of mentoring that occurred within FIC programs, considers the outcomes of mentoring, and the strengths and weaknesses of FIC trainee mentorship during and after training. Two case studies were conducted, at the University of Nairobi in Kenya and Makerere University in Uganda. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with former trainees, principal investigators and institutional leaders, exploring their perceptions of mentoring and its effects. RESULTS: Mentoring aspects of FIC programs were highly valued. Respondents felt that following formal training in the US there was much still to learn about conducting research, and mentoring relationships provided support in applying for and implementing research grants. Mentoring arrangements were initially with US collaborators, but over time relationships with senior African colleagues became critical, particularly in terms of navigating university administrative systems. Mentees were typically highly motivated to pass their skills on to others, and became eager mentors later in their careers. A minority of respondents raised concerns about directive approaches to mentorship that reflect more hierarchical rather than egalitarian approaches. DISCUSSION: Mentorship during and after FIC research training programs, while largely informal in nature, appears to have very positive impacts upon career development and inclination to remain in health research. Local African mentors often play a critical mentorship role, and their contributions should be better recognized.
Authors: Emmanuela Oppong; Huanyu Bao; Weiming Tang; María I Echavarria Mejia; Franklin Glozah; Nsisong Asanga; Christine J Boinett; Ana M Aguilar; Ezra Valido; Trisasi Lestari; Joseph D Tucker Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Dawn L Comeau; Kathryn Mishkin; Nestani Tukvadze; Zaza Avaliani; Russell R Kempker; Lisa Sthreshley; Matthew J Magee; Hannah Eisen; Damen Haile Mariam; Abraham Aseffa; Henry M Blumberg Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Andres G Lescano; Craig R Cohen; Tony Raj; Laetitia Rispel; Patricia J Garcia; Joseph R Zunt; Davidson H Hamer; Douglas C Heimburger; Benjamin H Chi; Albert I Ko; Elizabeth A Bukusi Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Benjamin H Chi; Jose M Belizan; Magaly M Blas; Alice Chuang; Michael D Wilson; Carla J Chibwesha; Carey Farquhar; Craig R Cohen; Tony Raj Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Anna Kalbarczyk; Wendy Davis; Sam Kalibala; Scott Geibel; Aisha Yansaneh; Nina A Martin; Ellen Weiss; Deanna Kerrigan; Yukari C Manabe Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-09
Authors: Martín Osvaldo Angel; Renata Colombo Bonadio; Guilherme Harada; Federico Waisberg; Diego Enrico; Oscar Arrieta; Luis Corrales; Claudio Martin; Gustavo Werutsky; Carlos Barrios; Luisa Ricaurte; Andres F Cardona Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2020-11
Authors: Daniela C Rodríguez; Nasreen S Jessani; Joseph Zunt; Sara Ardila-Gómez; Patience A Muwanguzi; Sylvester Ndeso Atanga; Bruno Sunguya; Carey Farquhar; Esther Nasuuna Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 3.640
Authors: Donald C Cole; Nancy Johnson; Raul Mejia; Hazel McCullough; Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay; Joaquin Barnoya; María Soledad Falabella Luco Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2015-08-03