BACKGROUND: Persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism after treatment with radioactive iodine (RAI) is common and many patients require either additional doses or surgery before they are cured. The purpose of this study was to identify patterns and predictors of failure of RAI in patients with hyperthyroidism. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with RAI from 2007 to 2010. Failure of RAI was defined as receipt of additional dose(s) and/or total thyroidectomy. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we conducted univariate analysis to identify factors associated with failure of RAI. A final multivariate model was then constructed with significant (p < 0.05) variables from the univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 325 patients analyzed, 74 patients (22.8 %) failed initial RAI treatment, 53 (71.6 %) received additional RAI, 13 (17.6 %) received additional RAI followed by surgery, and the remaining 8 (10.8 %) were cured after thyroidectomy. The percentage of patients who failed decreased in a stepwise fashion as RAI dose increased. Similarly, the incidence of failure increased as the presenting T3 level increased. Sensitivity analysis revealed that RAI doses <12.5 mCi were associated with failure while initial T3 and free T4 levels of at least 4.5 pg/mL and 2.3 ng/dL, respectively, were associated with failure. In the final multivariate analysis, higher T4 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.26; p = 0.02) and methimazole treatment (HR 2.55; 95 % CI 1.22-5.33; p = 0.01) were associated with failure. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory values at presentation can predict which patients with hyperthyroidism are at risk for failing RAI treatment. Higher doses of RAI or surgical referral may prevent the need for repeat RAI in selected patients.
BACKGROUND: Persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism after treatment with radioactive iodine (RAI) is common and many patients require either additional doses or surgery before they are cured. The purpose of this study was to identify patterns and predictors of failure of RAI in patients with hyperthyroidism. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with RAI from 2007 to 2010. Failure of RAI was defined as receipt of additional dose(s) and/or total thyroidectomy. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we conducted univariate analysis to identify factors associated with failure of RAI. A final multivariate model was then constructed with significant (p < 0.05) variables from the univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 325 patients analyzed, 74 patients (22.8 %) failed initial RAI treatment, 53 (71.6 %) received additional RAI, 13 (17.6 %) received additional RAI followed by surgery, and the remaining 8 (10.8 %) were cured after thyroidectomy. The percentage of patients who failed decreased in a stepwise fashion as RAI dose increased. Similarly, the incidence of failure increased as the presenting T3 level increased. Sensitivity analysis revealed that RAI doses <12.5 mCi were associated with failure while initial T3 and free T4 levels of at least 4.5 pg/mL and 2.3 ng/dL, respectively, were associated with failure. In the final multivariate analysis, higher T4 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.26; p = 0.02) and methimazole treatment (HR 2.55; 95 % CI 1.22-5.33; p = 0.01) were associated with failure. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory values at presentation can predict which patients with hyperthyroidism are at risk for failing RAI treatment. Higher doses of RAI or surgical referral may prevent the need for repeat RAI in selected patients.
Authors: O Törring; L Tallstedt; G Wallin; G Lundell; J G Ljunggren; A Taube; M Sääf; B Hamberger Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: E Ron; M M Doody; D V Becker; A B Brill; R E Curtis; M B Goldman; B S Harris; D A Hoffman; W M McConahey; H R Maxon; S Preston-Martin; M E Warshauer; F L Wong; J D Boice Journal: JAMA Date: 1998 Jul 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Vincent T Wu; Allison W Lorenzen; Anna C Beck; Vincent J Reid; Sonia L Sugg; James R Howe; Janet H Pollard; Geeta Lal; Ronald J Weigel Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Dawn M Elfenbein; David F Schneider; Jeffrey Havlena; Herbert Chen; Rebecca S Sippel Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Albert Stachura; Tomasz Gryn; Bernadetta Kałuża; Tadeusz Budlewski; Edward Franek Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 2.763