PURPOSE: Current evidence in dentistry recommends non-surgical treatment to manage enamel caries lesions. However, surveyed practitioners report they would restore enamel lesions that are confined to the enamel. Actual clinical data were used to evaluate patient, dentist, and practice characteristics associated with restoration of enamel caries, while accounting for other factors. METHODS: Data from a National Dental Practice-Based Research Network observational study of consecutive restorations placed in previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces and practice/demographic data from 229 participating network dentists were combined. ANOVA and logistic regression, using generalized estimating equations (GEE) and variable selection within blocks, were used to test the hypothesis that patient, dentist, and practice characteristics were associated with variations in enamel restorations of occlusal and proximal caries compared to dentin lesions, accounting for dentist and patient clustering. RESULTS: Network dentists from five regions placed 6,891 restorations involving occlusal and/or proximal caries lesions. Enamel restorations accounted for 16% of enrolled occlusal caries lesions and 6% of enrolled proximal caries lesions. Enamel occlusal restorations varied significantly (P < 0.05) by patient age and race/ethnicity, dentists' use of caries risk assessment, network region, and practice type. Enamel proximal restorations varied significantly (P < 0.05) by dentist race/ethnicity, network region, and practice type.
PURPOSE: Current evidence in dentistry recommends non-surgical treatment to manage enamel caries lesions. However, surveyed practitioners report they would restore enamel lesions that are confined to the enamel. Actual clinical data were used to evaluate patient, dentist, and practice characteristics associated with restoration of enamel caries, while accounting for other factors. METHODS: Data from a National Dental Practice-Based Research Network observational study of consecutive restorations placed in previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces and practice/demographic data from 229 participating network dentists were combined. ANOVA and logistic regression, using generalized estimating equations (GEE) and variable selection within blocks, were used to test the hypothesis that patient, dentist, and practice characteristics were associated with variations in enamel restorations of occlusal and proximal caries compared to dentin lesions, accounting for dentist and patient clustering. RESULTS: Network dentists from five regions placed 6,891 restorations involving occlusal and/or proximal caries lesions. Enamel restorations accounted for 16% of enrolled occlusal caries lesions and 6% of enrolled proximal caries lesions. Enamel occlusal restorations varied significantly (P < 0.05) by patient age and race/ethnicity, dentists' use of caries risk assessment, network region, and practice type. Enamel proximal restorations varied significantly (P < 0.05) by dentist race/ethnicity, network region, and practice type.
Authors: Matthew B Perkins; Peter S Jensen; James Jaccard; Peter Gollwitzer; Gabriele Oettingen; Elizabeth Pappadopulos; Kimberly E Hoagwood Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: J E Clarkson; S Turner; J M Grimshaw; C R Ramsay; M Johnston; A Scott; D Bonetti; C J Tilley; G Maclennan; R Ibbetson; L M D Macpherson; N B Pitts Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Marcelle M Nascimento; Valeria V Gordan; Vibeke Qvist; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; O D Williams; Jeffrey L Fellows; Lloyd K Ritchie; Ivar A Mjör; Jocelyn McClelland; Gregg H Gilbert Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Andreea Voinea-Griffin; D Brad Rindal; Jeffrey L Fellows; Andrei Barasch; Gregg H Gilbert; Monika M Safford Journal: J Healthc Qual Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.095
Authors: Debbie Bonetti; Marie Johnston; Jan E Clarkson; Jeremy Grimshaw; Nigel B Pitts; Martin Eccles; Nick Steen; Ruth Thomas; Graeme Maclennan; Liz Glidewell; Anne Walker Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Martin P Eccles; Susan Hrisos; Jill Francis; Eileen F Kaner; Heather O Dickinson; Fiona Beyer; Marie Johnston Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 7.327