Inorganic polyphosphates, linear polymers of orthophosphate, occur naturally throughout biology and have many industrial applications. Their biodegradable nature makes them attractive for a multitude of uses, and it would be important to understand how polyphosphates are turned over enzymatically. Studies of inorganic polyphosphatases are, however, hampered by the lack of high-throughput methods for detecting and quantifying rates of polyphosphate degradation. We now report chromogenic and fluorogenic polyphosphate substrates that permit spectrophotometric monitoring of polyphosphate hydrolysis and allow for high-throughput analyses of both endopolyphosphatase and exopolyphosphatase activities, depending on assay configuration. These substrates contain 4-nitrophenol or 4-methylumbelliferone moieties that are covalently attached to the terminal phosphates of polyphosphate via phosphoester linkages formed during reactions mediated by EDAC (1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide). This report identifies Nudt2 as an inorganic polyphosphatase and also adds to the known coupling chemistry for polyphosphates, permitting facile covalent linkage of alcohols with the terminal phosphates of inorganic polyphosphate.
Inorganic polyphosphates, linear polymers of orthophosphate, occur naturally throughout biology and have many industrial applications. Their biodegradable nature makes them attractive for a multitude of uses, and it would be important to understand how polyphosphates are turned over enzymatically. Studies of inorganic polyphosphatases are, however, hampered by the lack of high-throughput methods for detecting and quantifying rates of polyphosphate degradation. We now report chromogenic and fluorogenic polyphosphate substrates that permit spectrophotometric monitoring of polyphosphate hydrolysis and allow for high-throughput analyses of both endopolyphosphatase and exopolyphosphatase activities, depending on assay configuration. These substrates contain 4-nitrophenol or 4-methylumbelliferone moieties that are covalently attached to the terminal phosphates of polyphosphate via phosphoester linkages formed during reactions mediated by EDAC (1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide). This report identifies Nudt2 as an inorganic polyphosphatase and also adds to the known coupling chemistry for polyphosphates, permitting facile covalent linkage of alcohols with the terminal phosphates of inorganic polyphosphate.
Inorganic polyphosphates (polyP) are linear
polymers of orthophosphate
joined by high-energy phosphoanhydride bonds and can range in length
from tens to thousands of phosphates. PolyP is widespread throughout
biology and implicated in a multitude of physiologic processes in
organisms from bacteria to man,[1−4] although many of its biological functions likely
remain to be discovered and characterized. PolyP is also an industrial
chemical with applications in areas such as water treatment, food
processing, fertilizers, and flame retardants.[3] The biodegradable and versatile nature of polyP makes it an attractive
material with many uses, and it would be desirable to understand how
polyP is turned over. Known polyP-digesting enzymes include exopolyphosphatases
which sequentially remove terminal phosphates from polyP, and endopolyphosphatases
which hydrolyze internal phosphoanhydride bonds.[1] Although some of the enzymes responsible for degrading
polyP have been identified in unicellular organisms, they remain relatively
poorly studied in higher eukaryotes, with a few notable exceptions.[1,5] Two examples are mammalian alkaline phosphatase,[6] a highly potent exopolyphosphatase, and the human protein,
h-prune, a short-chain exopolyphosphatase implicated as a regulator
of metastasis.[7] Recent work has shown that
polyP is secreted from activated human platelets[8] and mast cells[9] and that it
is an important regulator of blood clotting[4] and complement.[10] PolyP is degraded in
human plasma with a half-life of about 90 min,[11] which is no doubt important in controlling polyP’s
biological action, yet the mechanism of its degradation in vivo is
currently unknown.An impediment to identifying and studying
the properties of polyP-degrading
enzymes is the dearth of high-throughput means for detecting inorganic
polyphosphatases and quantifying their activities. Many of the existing
methods for quantifying enzymatic polyP degradation are cumbersome,
of low sensitivity, or require the use of specialized equipment. The
methods also typically rely on multiple steps including chromatography,
gel electrophoresis, laborious physical extraction protocols coupled
with chemical detection of liberated inorganic orthophosphate, or
the use of radiolabeled polyP.[1] On the
other hand, recently reported, more facile methods for detecting exopolyphosphatase
activity include the continuous recording of released inorganic monophosphate,
which was successfully employed to determine the kinetic parameters
of the exopolyphosphatase, h-prune.[7] Detecting
and quantifying the action of endopolyphosphatases remains substantially
more time-consuming, however, as it typically involves resolving the
digested polyP products using gel electrophoresis.[12] We therefore sought to develop chromogenic and fluorogenic
polyP substrates that would allow polyP degradation to be followed
spectrophotometrically and, in particular, a method that would allow
high-throughput detection of endopolyphosphatase activity. Ideally,
we would covalently attach chromogenic or fluorogenic dyes to the
terminal phosphates of polyP. Chromogenic and fluorogenic substrates
are available for a number of hydrolases and are readily adaptable
to high-throughput assays in multiwell formats. We previously showed
that primary amines can be covalently coupled via phosphoramidate
linkages to the terminal phosphates of polyP in a reaction promoted
by the zero-length cross-linking reagent, 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide
(EDAC).[13] In the present study, we now
show that EDAC can also be used to promote the efficient formation
of phosphoester linkages with the terminal phosphates of polyP, and
we apply this chemistry to create chromogenic or fluorogenic polyphosphatase
substrates in which polyP is end-labeled with either 4-nitrophenol
(NOL) or 4-methylumbelliferone (MU). We also show that these polyP
derivatives can be used to detect the action of endo- and exopolyphosphatases,
depending on assay configuration.
Experimental
Section
Materials
Specified reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted. NOL was recrystallized using
hot water and ethanol. All experiments in this report used a polyP
preparation (Natriumpolyphosphat P70) that was a kind gift from BK
Giulini GmbH (Ludwigshafen, Germany). The polymer lengths of this
preparation ranged from about 20 to 100 phosphates, with a mean length
of approximately 45 to 50. PolyP concentrations were quantified using
malachite green after acid hydrolysis[14] and are reported here in terms of phosphate monomer (monomer formula:
NaPO3). PolyP was end-labeled with spermidine via phosphoramidate
linkages as described.[13]
Methods
EDAC-Mediated
End-Labeling of PolyP by Esterification with Methanol
A mixture
of 5.9 mM polyP, 150 mM freshly dissolved EDAC, and 6.4
M methanol in 100 mM MES buffer pH 6.5 was incubated for either 5
h at 37 °C or 1 h at 65 °C, after which the reaction mixtures
were cooled on ice. Reaction volumes varied from 0.35 to 6.5 mL. PolyP-methanol
was purified by acetone precipitation; briefly, NaCl was added to
the reaction mixture (to 535 mM) followed by two reaction volumes
of acetone, with mixing after each addition. The mixture was then
centrifuged at 11,000 × g for 7 min at room
temperature, after which the supernatant was discarded. The polyP
pellet was washed twice by adding acetone to the tube followed by
centrifugation. Pellets were then dried and redissolved in water.Prior to NMR analyses, polyP-methanol was further purified by adsorption
to a suspension of silica particles (“glass milk”).
Glass milk was produced by a modification of the method of Vogelstein
and Gillespie,[15] in which 250 mL silica
(325 mesh) was stirred in 400 mL water for 1 h, then allowed to settle
for 1 h to remove large particles. The supernatant was then centrifuged
for 4000 × g for 15 min after which the pellet
was collected and resuspended in 200 mL 50% nitric acid. This was
then stirred and heated to close to boiling, after which it was cooled
to room temperature. The silica fines were then collected by centrifugation
and washed five times with water by resuspension and centrifugation.
The final pellet of washed silica fines was resuspended as a 50% slurry
by volume (glass milk). PolyP was purified by binding to, and elution
from, glass milk as described,[14] except
that the solutions were kept chilled throughout, and the polyP was
eluted with 95 °C water instead of buffer.
EDAC-Mediated
End-Labeling of PolyP by Esterification with NOL
A mixture
of 5.9 mM polyP, 150 mM freshly dissolved EDAC, and 200
to 525 mM NOL was incubated for 1 h at 65 °C. Reaction volumes
varied from 0.35 to 40 mL, and mixtures were agitated throughout,
since the NOL concentrations exceeded solubility limits even in hot
water. Completed reactions were cooled on ice and polyP was isolated
by acetone precipitation. Because some free NOL coprecipitated with
polyP in the first acetone precipitation, three full cycles of acetone
precipitation were employed in which the collected polyP pellets were
completely resuspended in water and reprecipitated by addition of
NaCl and acetone followed by centrifugation. PolyP-NOL was then further
purified using Bio-Gel P-6 desalting columns (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA).
The polyP-containing column fractions were identified by toluidine
blue staining,[16] pooled, and lyophilized.
EDAC-Mediated End-Labeling of PolyP by Esterification with MU
A mixture of 5.5 mM polyP, 150 mM freshly dissolved EDAC, and 280
mM MU in a reaction volume of 1 mL was incubated for 1 h at 65 °C
with agitation because the concentrations of MU used exceeded solubility
limits. The reactions were then cooled on ice and polyP-MU was isolated
using acetone precipitation as described above for the preparation
of polyP-NOL.
NMR Analyses
Purified polyP and
polyP derivatives were
dissolved in water containing 10% (v/v) D2O. All solution
NMR spectra were collected on a Varian Unity INOVA 600 MHz proton
frequency spectrometer with a 5 mm Varian AutoTuneX 1H/X PFG Z probe
at 23 °C. 1D 31P and 13C spectra were acquired
with a 2 s recycle delay. 1D 1H spectra were acquired with
a 1 s recycle delay, and solvent suppression was done by presaturation.
2D 1H–13C Heteronuclear Single Quantum
Coherence (HSQC) spectra were acquired with 2048 and 160 points in
the 1H and 13C dimensions, respectively. 1H and 13C spectra were referenced with external
tetramethylsilane at 0 ppm, and 31P spectra were referenced
with external phosphoric acid at 0 ppm. 1D spectra were processed
with MNOVA (MestreLab Research), and 2D spectra with NMRPipe.[17] polyP: 31P NMR (90% H2O 10% D2O, 243 MHz) δ: −7.01 (s), −21.14,
−21.65. polyP-methanol: 31P NMR (90% H2O 10% D2O, 243 MHz) δ: −9.36 (d, JP,P = 17.8 Hz), −21.67. 1H
NMR (90% H2O 10% D2O, 600 MHz) δ: 3.51
(d, JH,P = 11.42 Hz). 13C NMR
(90% H2O 10% D2O, 151 MHz) δ: 53.7. polyP-NOL: 31P NMR (90% H2O 10% D2O, 243 MHz) δ:
−10.43, −16.81(d, JP,P =
17.7 Hz), −21.43, −21.61.
Gel Electrophoresis of
PolyP
PolyP preparations were
resolved on urea-containing 15% polyacrylamide gels and visualized
using DAPI negative staining as described.[18]
Alkaline Phosphatase Digestion of PolyP
Protection
against exopolyphosphatase-mediated degradation was employed to determine
the extent to which polyP molecules were doubly end-labeled, as previously
described.[13] Such digestions used calf
intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIAP, Promega; Madison, WI), a highly
active exopolyphosphatase.[6] Typical reactions
included 250 μM polyP and 20 units/mL CIAP; the liberated monophosphate
was quantified using malachite green analysis.[14]PolyP-NOL preparations often varied in the extent
to which both ends of polyP were derivatized. To rid these preparations
of singly labeled polyP, some were digested to completion with recombinant
shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP, New England BioLabs; Ipswich, MA)
by incubating 50 mM derivatized polyP with 50 U/mL SAP for 2 h at
37 °C in the manufacturer’s buffer. SAP then was inactivated
by heating at 65 °C (7 min), after which the remaining polyP
was repurified by acetone precipitation. These preparations were termed
SAP-treated polyP-NOL.
Endopolyphosphatase Digestion of PolyP
Certain nudix
hydrolases were examined for endopolyphosphatase activity, typically
in a two-stage assay. In the first stage, polyP-MU or SAP-treated
polyP-NOL was incubated with endoacting enzyme (Nudt2 or Nudt3, Fitzgerald
Industries International; Acton, MA) in the appropriate buffer at
37 °C, after which the reactions were chilled on ice. Buffer
conditions were the following: for Nudt2, 8 mM SAP-treated polyP-NOL
or 2 mM polyP-MU, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, and 5 mM MgCl2; for
Nudt3: 5.5 mM SAP-treated polyP-NOL or 2 mM polyP-MU, 25 mM HEPES
pH 7.4, 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM dithiothreitol.For the second stage, a solution of CIAP in 100 mM Tris-HCl pH
8.8, 0.2 mM ZnCl2 was prepared and warmed to 37 °C
in 96-well polystyrene plates (Corning; Tewksbury, MA). The second
stage was initiated by pipetting 100 μL of the chilled nudix-polyP
reaction into prewarmed wells containing 100 μL CIAP solution,
after which the rate of dye release was monitored spectrophotometrically
at 37 °C. For polyP-NOL substrate, absorbance at 400 nm was measured
using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices; Sunnyvale,
CA); for polyP-MU substrate, fluorescence was quantified in fluorescence
mode using excitation at 360 nm, emission at 450 nm, and a 435 nm
cutoff filter.
Results
EDAC-Mediated Esterification
of the Terminal Phosphates of PolyP
with Methanol
EDAC has been used to promote the formation
of ester linkages between alcohols and carboxylates,[19] as well as phosphoester linkages between alcohols and certain
organic phosphates.[20] We therefore examined
whether EDAC could promote the formation of ester linkages between
alcohols and the terminal phosphate groups of inorganic polyP (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
EDAC-Mediated Esterification of the Terminal
Phosphates of PolyP
EDAC-Mediated Esterification of the Terminal
Phosphates of PolyP
Compounds: 1,
polyP; 2, polyP-methanol; 3, polyP-NOL; 4, polyP-MU.As proof of principle,
and to identify reaction conditions more
readily, we examined EDAC-mediated esterification of polyP with methanol.
The reaction resulted in a product that was protected from exopolyphosphatase
(CIAP) digestion to an extent comparable to polyP that had been end-labeled
with spermidine via phosphoramidate linkages (Table 1).
Table 1
Resistance of PolyP Derivatives to
Hydrolysis by Alkaline Phosphatase (CIAP)
reactant
end label
% hydrolysis
(none)
–
96.0
±
16.7
spermidine
NH2(CH2)3NH(CH2)4NH–
20.8
±
2.1
methanol
H3CO–
19.8
±
2.0
NOL
O2NC6H4O–
27.0
±
2.0
MU
C10H7O3–
3.9
±
1.6
We used solution-state NMR to further verify the product’s
identity. In the 31P spectra, unmodified polyP displayed
a relatively broad alpha (terminal) phosphorus peak at about 7 ppm
(Figure 1A); the broadness likely reflects
exchange of protonation states of the phosphate group.
Figure 1
NMR analyses of end-methylated
polyP. 1D 31P spectra
of (A) unmodified polyP and (B) polyP following reaction with methanol
and EDAC. The terminal phosphate (alpha) peaks are indicated by arrows,
and the inset in panel A is an expanded view of the alpha peak region
of this spectrum. (C) The expanded view shows that the sharp alpha
peak in panel B is resolved as a doublet. (D) Without 1H decoupling, the alpha peak from methylated polyP expands into quartets
as a result of J couplings from methyl protons. (E,F)
1D 1H spectra of methylated polyP with (E) and without
(F) applied decoupling irradiation at the alpha-phosphate frequency.
The doublet peak at ∼3.5 ppm (E) converts into a singlet (F)
after irradiation because the proton peak is coupled to a phosphorus
atom. (Other peaks in the 1H spectra are from the MES buffer
used in product purification and thus not affected by the decoupling.)
1D 13C spectra of methylated polyP prepared with (G) natural
abundance methanol or (H) 20% 13C-enriched methanol. Use
of 13C-enriched methanol in the reaction greatly enhanced
the signal at ∼53.7 ppm (asterisk). (Other 13C peaks
are from the MES buffer.) (I) 2D HSQC analysis of the 53.7 ppm 13C peak confirmed that the 13C atoms are connected
to the methyl protons.
NMR analyses of end-methylated
polyP. 1D 31P spectra
of (A) unmodified polyP and (B) polyP following reaction with methanol
and EDAC. The terminal phosphate (alpha) peaks are indicated by arrows,
and the inset in panel A is an expanded view of the alpha peak region
of this spectrum. (C) The expanded view shows that the sharp alpha
peak in panel B is resolved as a doublet. (D) Without 1H decoupling, the alpha peak from methylated polyP expands into quartets
as a result of J couplings from methyl protons. (E,F)
1D 1H spectra of methylated polyP with (E) and without
(F) applied decoupling irradiation at the alpha-phosphate frequency.
The doublet peak at ∼3.5 ppm (E) converts into a singlet (F)
after irradiation because the proton peak is coupled to a phosphorus
atom. (Other peaks in the 1H spectra are from the MES buffer
used in product purification and thus not affected by the decoupling.)
1D 13C spectra of methylated polyP prepared with (G) natural
abundance methanol or (H) 20% 13C-enriched methanol. Use
of 13C-enriched methanol in the reaction greatly enhanced
the signal at ∼53.7 ppm (asterisk). (Other 13C peaks
are from the MES buffer.) (I) 2D HSQC analysis of the 53.7 ppm 13C peak confirmed that the 13C atoms are connected
to the methyl protons.Methylated polyP displayed an alpha peak shifted to 9.4 ppm
(Figure 1B), which was also much sharper than
the alpha peak
of underivatized polyP. The methylated polyP alpha peak sharpness
likely is caused by attenuation of the exchange broadening. This shifted
alpha peak displayed as a doublet (Figure 1C) owing to the 31P–31P J-coupling between the alpha- and beta-phosphorus atoms. We next utilized
the 3JH–P coupling between
the methyl protons and alpha-phosphorus atom to confirm end modification
and map connectivity. When proton decoupling was turned off, each
peak of the alpha phosphorus doublet signal was split into a quartet
pattern (Figure 1D), indicating the presence
of three neighboring protons. To assign the chemical shift of the
methyl protons, we acquired a 1D 1H spectrum with heteronuclear
decoupling irradiation at the alpha phosphorus frequency. The resulting
spectrum, when compared to the spectrum without decoupling (compare
Figure 1E and F), shows that the peak at around
3.5 ppm is converted from a doublet to a singlet. This transformation
is consistent with a proton signal being coupled to a single neighboring
phosphorus atom. To identify the carbon signal of the methyl group,
we used 13C-enriched (20%) methanol to synthesize methylated
polyP. The resulting 1D 13C spectrum (Figure 1H) shows significant enhancement of the carbon peak at ∼53.6
ppm, which was almost unobservable in natural abundance methyl-polyP
preparation (Figure 1G). To confirm that coupling
existed between the carbon peak and the previously identified methyl
proton signal, we performed 2D 1H–13C
HSQC on the 13C-enriched sample, with clearly observable
correlation between the two signals (Figure 1I).
PolyP End-Labeled with NOL or MU
NOL is used often
in making chromogenic substrates, as its absorption spectrum shifts
dramatically when ester-linked to carboxylates or a single phosphate.
MU is also extensively employed in synthesizing fluorogenic substrates
because its fluorescence is quenched when ester-linked to carboxylates.
Reacting polyP with NOL and EDAC resulted in a polyP preparation that
was nearly as resistant to CIAP digestion as was polyP end-labeled
with spermidine or methanol (Table 1). Reacting
polyP with MU and EDAC resulted in a product with even greater CIAP
resistance (Table 1) than that of polyP derivatized
with spermidine or methanol. Absorption spectra of polyP-NOL before
and after hydrolysis reveal an absorption maximum of 285 nm before
hydrolysis (indicating covalent coupling of the NOL dye to phosphate)
and 398 nm after hydrolysis (characteristic of free NOL; Figure 2C).
Figure 2
Product analysis and NOL substitution series using UV–vis
spectroscopy. (A) Absorbance spectra of NOL substitution series with
(B) the accompanying compounds’ chemical structures. Each compound
(except (ii)) was brought to a final concentration of 150 μM
in alkaline conditions (1.5 M Tris-HCl buffer pH = 8.8, final) and
scanned spectrally; NOL (ii) was scanned under acidic conditions.
Absorbance maxima were the following: 398 nm (i), 317 nm (ii), 310
nm (iii), and 285 nm (iv). (C) Absorption spectra of polyP end-labeled
with NOL, before (iv) and after (v) acid hydrolysis (1 M HCl for 1
h at 100 °C) followed by alkalization to pH 8.8.
Product analysis and NOL substitution series using UV–vis
spectroscopy. (A) Absorbance spectra of NOL substitution series with
(B) the accompanying compounds’ chemical structures. Each compound
(except (ii)) was brought to a final concentration of 150 μM
in alkaline conditions (1.5 M Tris-HCl buffer pH = 8.8, final) and
scanned spectrally; NOL (ii) was scanned under acidic conditions.
Absorbance maxima were the following: 398 nm (i), 317 nm (ii), 310
nm (iii), and 285 nm (iv). (C) Absorption spectra of polyP end-labeled
with NOL, before (iv) and after (v) acid hydrolysis (1 M HCl for 1
h at 100 °C) followed by alkalization to pH 8.8.Analyzing polyP-NOL by 1D 31P NMR produced
an alpha
peak shifted from ∼7 ppm in underivatized polyP (Figure 1A) to a doublet at ∼17 ppm in polyP-NOL (Figure 3A), consistent with covalent modification of the
terminal phosphates. Resolving polyP and polyP-NOL by gel electrophoresis
indicated little change in the distribution of polymer lengths after
reacting the polyP with NOL and EDAC (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Analysis of polyP end-labeling with NOL. (A) 1D 31P
spectrum of polyP-NOL highly labeled at both ends. The alpha phosphate
peak, indicated by an arrow, is resolved as a doublet (inset) upon
axis expansion. (B) Comparison of polyP and polyP-NOL resolved by
gel electrophoresis and detected by DAPI negative staining. (C) Enzymatic
degradation of varying concentrations of incompletely end-labeled
polyP-NOL (8 to 16 mM phosphate) by CIAP, with NOL release detected
spectrophotometrically at 400 nm.
Analysis of polyP end-labeling with NOL. (A) 1D 31P
spectrum of polyP-NOL highly labeled at both ends. The alpha phosphate
peak, indicated by an arrow, is resolved as a doublet (inset) upon
axis expansion. (B) Comparison of polyP and polyP-NOL resolved by
gel electrophoresis and detected by DAPI negative staining. (C) Enzymatic
degradation of varying concentrations of incompletely end-labeled
polyP-NOL (8 to 16 mM phosphate) by CIAP, with NOL release detected
spectrophotometrically at 400 nm.
Exopolyphosphatase (CIAP) Digestion of PolyP-NOL
End-labeling
efficiency was calculated after complete acid hydrolysis of polyP-NOL
and quantification and comparison of liberated NOL and monophosphate
ratios (and assuming a mean polymer length of 50 phosphates). Using
a polyP-NOL preparation in which approximately 40% of the polyP molecules
were singly end-labeled, we added CIAP and monitored A400 versus time at 37 °C (Figure 3C). These results show that singly labeled polyP-NOL can be
used to follow the progress of exopolyphosphatase digestion. The curvilinear
progress curves probably reflect the fact that the substrate is ∼50
phosphates long but the chromophore is released only when the last
phosphate is removed from the substrate.
Endopolyphosphatase Digestion
of PolyP-NOL and PolyP-MU
Covalent modification of polyP
on both ends protects polyP against
exopolyphosphatase (CIAP) digestion (Table 1). We therefore reasoned that two-stage assays for endopolyphosphatase
activity could be devised using polyP that is completely labeled on
both ends with chromophore or fluorophore. Digestion by exopolyphosphatase
should be possible only after the action of endopolyphosphatase has
exposed free polyP ends. In such an assay one could employ either
sequential or simultaneous digestion with endo- and exopolyphosphatases.
Accordingly, polyP-NOL was predigested to completion with SAP to eliminate
singly labeled molecules, after which the polyP-NOL was repurified.
We then used this SAP-treated polyP-NOL in a two-stage endopolyphosphatase
assay in which we first digested the substrate with either Nudt3 (a
hydrolase with known endopolyphosphatase activity[12]) or Nudt2 (another nudix hydrolase that cleaves dinucleotide
polyphosphates, “NpnNs”, but whose endopolyphosphatase
activity was not known) and then monitored product release during
digestion with CIAP. Figure 4 shows that few
dye molecules from SAP-treated polyP-NOL were released upon incubating
the substrate with either endopolyphosphatase (Nudt2 or Nudt3) or
exopolyphosphatase (CIAP) alone. However, polyP-NOL was readily hydrolyzed
by CIAP following pretreatment with either Nud2 or Nudt3. Additionally,
this experiment demonstrated that Nudt2 has endopolyphosphatase activity
(Figure 4B).
Figure 4
Sequential digestion of doubly end-labeled
polyP-NOL with endopolyphosphatases
and exopolyphosphatases. In both panels, doubly end-labeled polyP-NOL
was first incubated with or without endopolyphosphatase (Nudt2 or
Nudt3) for 10 or 60 min at 37 °C. Exopolyphosphatase (120 U/mL
CIAP) was then added to the indicated samples and NOL release was
quantified over time. (A) Treatment with 850 nM Nudt3. (B) Treatment
with 250 nM Nudt2.
Sequential digestion of doubly end-labeled
polyP-NOL with endopolyphosphatases
and exopolyphosphatases. In both panels, doubly end-labeled polyP-NOL
was first incubated with or without endopolyphosphatase (Nudt2 or
Nudt3) for 10 or 60 min at 37 °C. Exopolyphosphatase (120 U/mL
CIAP) was then added to the indicated samples and NOL release was
quantified over time. (A) Treatment with 850 nM Nudt3. (B) Treatment
with 250 nM Nudt2.Digestion of polyP-MU
by mixtures of endo- and exopolyphosphatases.
(A) Structure of doubly end-labeled polyP-MU. (B) Sequential digestion
of doubly end-labeled polyP-MU with endopolyphosphatase and exopolyphosphatase.
PolyP-MU was first incubated with or without endopolyphosphatase (250
nM Nudt2) for 80 min at 37 °C, after which varying concentrations
of exopolyphosphatase (CIAP) were added to the indicated samples and
the increase in fluorescence (AFU) was quantified over time. (C) Sequential
digestion of doubly end-labeled polyP-MU, first, with or without 250
nM Nudt2 for 90 min at 37 °C, after which 5 U/mL CIAP was added
to the indicated samples and fluorescence was quantified over time.
(D) Simultaneous digestion of polyP-MU with the indicated concentrations
of Nudt2 and 55 U/mL CIAP, during which fluorescence was quantified
over time.The efficiency of polyP labeling
with MU was usually greater than
that with NOL (Table 1), so predigestion of
polyP-MU (Figure 5A) with SAP was typically
not required before using this substrate to detect endopolyphosphatase
activity. Figure 5B shows the reaction curves
for two-stage assays of polyP-MU digestion with Nudt2 followed by
CIAP. Neither Nudt2 nor CIAP alone released significant MU, while
polyP-MU was efficiently digested by CIAP after incubation with Nudt2.
Figure 5
Digestion of polyP-MU
by mixtures of endo- and exopolyphosphatases.
(A) Structure of doubly end-labeled polyP-MU. (B) Sequential digestion
of doubly end-labeled polyP-MU with endopolyphosphatase and exopolyphosphatase.
PolyP-MU was first incubated with or without endopolyphosphatase (250
nM Nudt2) for 80 min at 37 °C, after which varying concentrations
of exopolyphosphatase (CIAP) were added to the indicated samples and
the increase in fluorescence (AFU) was quantified over time. (C) Sequential
digestion of doubly end-labeled polyP-MU, first, with or without 250
nM Nudt2 for 90 min at 37 °C, after which 5 U/mL CIAP was added
to the indicated samples and fluorescence was quantified over time.
(D) Simultaneous digestion of polyP-MU with the indicated concentrations
of Nudt2 and 55 U/mL CIAP, during which fluorescence was quantified
over time.
This experiment also demonstrates the amount of CIAP required for
maximal rates of product release. Figure 5C
shows a much shorter time course of the second stage of this two-stage
assay, using saturating levels of CIAP. We tested Nudt1 (a nudix hydrolase
known to cleave Ap3A but not long-chain NpnN
molecules) in a similar two-stage assay, but under the various conditions
we used, the enzyme did not support MU release by CIAP (data not shown).
We also examined a one-stage assay employing polyP-MU incubated simultaneously
with CIAP plus varying concentrations of Nudt2. We found limited product
release with CIAP alone but robust product release by the combination
of CIAP and Nudt2 (Figure 5D).
Discussion
This study had two goals: expand the covalent coupling chemistry
for polyP, allowing for facile linkage of alcohols to the terminal
phosphates of polyP via phosphoester bonds; and use this chemistry
to develop high-throughput methods for detecting and quantifying the
enzymatic digestion of polyP. We now report that the water-soluble
cross-linker, EDAC, can be used to efficiently generate phosphoester
linkages between alcohols and the terminal phosphates of polyP. We
utilized this coupling chemistry to generate new chromogenic and fluorogenic
substrates for detecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of polyP, based
on phosphoester end-labeling of polyP with NOL or MU, respectively.
Additionally, with our polyP substrates, we were able to monitor and
distinguish endo- and exopolyphosphatase activities in real time.Previously, we reported that EDAC could be used efficiently to
couple compounds with primary amines to the terminal phosphates of
polyP via phosphoramidate linkages, and this chemistry has allowed
us to link a variety of probes to polyP;[13] for example, we used this method to biotinylate polyP, which we
then employed to detect and quantify interactions between polyP and
blood clotting proteins.[21,22] Although phosphoramidate
linkages are relatively stable under neutral and alkaline conditions,
the linkages are highly acid-labile.[23] It
would be advantageous, therefore, to be able to efficiently link the
terminal phosphates of polyP to organic compounds via phosphoester
linkages, which, unlike phosphoramidate linkages, resist acid hydrolysis
at physiological temperatures.[23] A previous
study used combinations of carbodiimides (other than EDAC) in conjunction
with polyP and alcohols in anhydrous organic solvents to generate
phosphoester linkages to polyP; however, the reactions also caused
substantial polyP hydrolysis to much shorter polyP chains and the
apparent formation of cyclic and branched polyP adducts (which are
unstable in aqueous solution).[24] In this
report we identified aqueous coupling conditions for EDAC-mediated
formation of phosphoester linkages to polyP that resulted in labeling
just the terminal phosphates and that did not appreciably shorten
the polyP chains.Full-length polyP capped on either end with
chromogenic or fluorogenic
dyes was used to detect phosphatase activity. PolyP-NOL preparations
that were incompletely labeled on both polyP ends were useful substrates
for detecting exopolyphosphatase activity, which released free NOL
upon the complete hydrolysis of the singly end-labeled polyP. On the
other hand, polyP-NOL and polyP-MU preparations that were fully labeled
on both polyP ends were highly resistant to exopolyphosphatase digestion,
and this property was used as the basis of a two-stage assay in detecting
endopolyphosphatase activity. In such assays, endopolyphosphatase
digestion creates free polyP ends which are then substrates for exopolyphosphatase
(CIAP) digestion, which in turn releases free dye from polyP-NOL or
polyP-MU.Not surprisingly, assays using the fluorogenic substrate,
polyP-MU,
could be conducted using lower substrate concentrations than those
using the chromogenic substrate, polyP-NOL, owing to the greater sensitivity
of fluorescence-based detection methods; however, assays using fluorogenic
substrates require more specialized equipment and sample handling
than do simple chromogenic assays, prompting us to develop both types
of substrates in this study.We constructed a two-stage assay
to demonstrate the activity of
a known endopolyphosphatase (Nudt3), and to demonstrate that another
nudix hydrolase (Nudt2) also exhibits endopolyphosphatase activity.
Nudt3, sometimes called DIPP1, or simply DIPP, is a nudix-type enzyme
with multiple known in vitro substrates: capped mRNA, oxo-8-dGTPase,
inositol pyrophosphates, dinucleotide polyphosphates, and inorganic
polyphosphate (reviewed by McLennan[25]).
Many nudix-type phosphatases are clinically important enzymes and
their overexpression can be markers of disease. Nudt2 (Apah1), for
example, is an Ap4A hydrolase that, when overexpressed
in breast cancer, correlates with poor prognosis.[26] In addition to processing Ap4A, Nudt2 can hydrolyze
long-chain NpnNs such as Ap6A. We hypothesized
that this nudix enzyme, though previously not described as having
endopolyphosphatase activity on inorganic polyP, might be able to
cleave polyP and that we might detect this cleavage using our substrates
in conjunction with CIAP. This was confirmed with our novel substrates.
Like Nudt2, the human short-chain exopolyphosphatase, h-prune, is
also implicated in tumor survival,[7] again
providing a connection between alterations in polyP degradation and
human health.It should also be noted that the substrates only
release a signal
(free dye) when the last phosphate of the polyP chain is removed by
an exopolyphosphatase. While this reaction was efficiently catalyzed
by CIAP, other exopolyphosphatases might digest polyP to very short
chains but not completely to monophosphate and therefore would not
be expected to release the dye from these substrates. Such enzymes
could be studied using these substrates in sequential assays employing
CIAP.We anticipate that the utilization of chromogenic and
fluorogenic
polyP substrates will aid further inquiry into how polyphosphates
are turned over enzymatically. For example, an additional class of
enzymes that could conceivably be studied using these substrates are
kinases that utilize polyP as a substrate/phosphatedonor. Also important
is the development of a method for making stable ester linkages to
the ends of polyP. Applications for such phosphoester linkages could
include attaching polyP to surfaces, fabricating polyP-containing
nanoparticles, and attaching fluorescent probes to polyP, in addition
to creating the chromogenic and fluorogenic substrates for polyP-degrading
enzymes reported here.
Conclusions
Using carbodiimide-mediated
chemistry, we selectively esterified
the terminal phosphates of inorganic polyP polymers with various alcohols.
In a proof-of-principle experiment, we used methanol in esterification
reactions and confirmed the product through 1D and 2D 31P, 1H, and 13C NMR analyses. We also showed
that polyP could be similarly end-labeled with chromogenic or fluorogenic
alcohols to form adducts. These adducts were shown to be useful substrates
for polyP-degrading enzymes, allowing us to monitor enzyme activity
spectrophotometrically in real time; furthermore, we used these substrates
to identify a new function for the clinically significant enzyme,
Nudt2. The chemistry and substrates developed in this work are likely
to be useful for synthetic and clinical applications.
Authors: Stephanie A Smith; Nicola J Mutch; Deepak Baskar; Peter Rohloff; Roberto Docampo; James H Morrissey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephanie A Smith; Sharon H Choi; Rebecca Davis-Harrison; Jillian Huyck; John Boettcher; Chad M Rienstra; Chad M Reinstra; James H Morrissey Journal: Blood Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Gabriella M Fernandes-Cunha; Colin J McKinlay; Jessica R Vargas; Henning J Jessen; Robert M Waymouth; Paul A Wender Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Magdalena Szymusiak; Alexander J Donovan; Stephanie A Smith; Ross Ransom; Hao Shen; Joseph Kalkowski; James H Morrissey; Ying Liu Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Andrew S Marriott; Olga Vasieva; Yongxiang Fang; Nikki A Copeland; Alexander G McLennan; Nigel J Jones Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240