Literature DB >> 24999899

Ipilimumab in pretreated patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous, uveal and mucosal melanoma.

Marliese Alexander1, James D Mellor2, Grant McArthur2, Damien Kee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ipilimumab in an Australian clinical setting, and to assess the association of response with melanoma subtype, BRAF mutation status, absolute lymphocyte count and incidence of serious immune-related adverse events (AEs). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab at an Australian oncology centre between July 2010 and April 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence and severity of AEs.
RESULTS: 104 patients were retrospectively followed for a median of 7 months (range 0-30 months). Median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI, 6.6-12.4), and median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-3.4). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 42% (95% CI, 32%-52%) and 18% (95% CI, 9%-30%), respectively. Median OS for patients with non-cutaneous (mucosal and uveal) melanomas was almost half that of patients with cutaneous melanoma: 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-12.4) v 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.1-13.8); P = 0.11. Raised absolute lymphocyte count was associated with increased PFS (P ≤ 0.005 at all measured time points) but not with OS (P > 0.15). Sex, age, brain metastases, BRAF mutation status, incidence of severe immune-related AEs and baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels did not affect OS or PFS (P > 0.05). Eighteen of 104 patients experienced serious AEs (≥ grade 3), including two treatment-related deaths.
CONCLUSION: In an Australian clinical practice setting, ipilimumab achieved efficacy and tolerability measures similar to those reported in clinical trials. The frequency and severity of ipilimumab-related AEs (including death) are notable, and treatment should occur under the supervision of an experienced clinical team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24999899     DOI: 10.5694/mja13.10448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  22 in total

Review 1.  Uveal melanoma as a target for immune-therapy.

Authors:  Marc Oliva; Antonio J Rullan; Josep M Piulats
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

2.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced mucosal melanoma.

Authors:  James C Kuo
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2017-10-04

3.  Prevalence of NRAS Mutation, PD-L1 Expression and Amplification, and Overall Survival Analysis in 36 Primary Vaginal Melanomas.

Authors:  Hai-Yun Wang; Xiao-Yan Wu; Xiao Zhang; Xin-Hua Yang; Ya-Kang Long; Yan-Fen Feng; Fang Wang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-02

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Mucosal Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Sandra P D'Angelo; James Larkin; Jeffrey A Sosman; Celeste Lebbé; Benjamin Brady; Bart Neyns; Henrik Schmidt; Jessica C Hassel; F Stephen Hodi; Paul Lorigan; Kerry J Savage; Wilson H Miller; Peter Mohr; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Julie Charles; Martin Kaatz; Mario Sznol; Jeffrey S Weber; Alexander N Shoushtari; Mary Ruisi; Joel Jiang; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Aaron C Tan; Amy B Heimberger; Alexander M Menzies; Nick Pavlakis; Mustafa Khasraw
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Study design and rationale for a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (SUMIT).

Authors:  Richard D Carvajal; Gary K Schwartz; Helen Mann; Ian Smith; Paul D Nathan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Cancer genomic research at the crossroads: realizing the changing genetic landscape as intratumoral spatial and temporal heterogeneity becomes a confounding factor.

Authors:  Shengwen Calvin Li; Lisa May Ling Tachiki; Mustafa H Kabeer; Brent A Dethlefs; Michael J Anthony; William G Loudon
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Construction of a Promising Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells Gene Signature to Improve Prediction of the Prognosis and Immune Response of Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Yifang Sun; Jian Wu; Yonggang Yuan; Yumin Lu; Ming Luo; Ling Lin; Shengsheng Ma
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-28

9.  Ipilimumab in the real world: the UK expanded access programme experience in previously treated advanced melanoma patients.

Authors:  Saif S Ahmad; Wendi Qian; Sarah Ellis; Elaine Mason; Muhammad A Khattak; Avinash Gupta; Heather Shaw; Amy Quinton; Jarmila Kovarikova; Kiruthikah Thillai; Ankit Rao; Ruth Board; Jenny Nobes; Angus Dalgleish; Simon Grumett; Anthony Maraveyas; Sarah Danson; Toby Talbot; Mark Harries; Maria Marples; Ruth Plummer; Satish Kumar; Paul Nathan; Mark R Middleton; James Larkin; Paul Lorigan; Matthew Wheater; Christian H Ottensmeier; Pippa G Corrie
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated patients with different subtypes of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Lisa Zimmer; Thomas K Eigentler; Felix Kiecker; Jan Simon; Jochen Utikal; Peter Mohr; Carola Berking; Eckhart Kämpgen; Edgar Dippel; Rudolf Stadler; Axel Hauschild; Michael Fluck; Patrick Terheyden; Rainer Rompel; Carmen Loquai; Zeinab Assi; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.