Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a worldwide food staple, but substantial waste accompanies the cultivation of this crop due to wounding of the outer skin and subsequent unfavorable healing conditions. Motivated by both economic and nutritional considerations, this metabolite profiling study aims to improve understanding of closing layer and wound periderm formation and guide the development of new methods to ensure faster and more complete healing after skin breakage. The polar metabolites of wound-healing tissues from four potato cultivars with differing patterns of tuber skin russeting (Norkotah Russet, Atlantic, Chipeta, and Yukon Gold) were analyzed at three and seven days after wounding, during suberized closing layer formation and nascent wound periderm development, respectively. The polar extracts were assessed using LC-MS and NMR spectroscopic methods, including multivariate analysis and tentative identification of 22 of the 24 biomarkers that discriminate among the cultivars at a given wound-healing time point or between developmental stages. Differences among the metabolites that could be identified from NMR- and MS-derived biomarkers highlight the strengths and limitations of each method, also demonstrating the complementarity of these approaches in terms of assembling a complete molecular picture of the tissue extracts. Both methods revealed that differences among the cultivar metabolite profiles diminish as healing proceeds during the period following wounding. The biomarkers included polyphenolic amines, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids and glycoalkaloids. Because wound healing is associated with oxidative stress, the free radical scavenging activities of the extracts from different cultivars were measured at each wounding time point, revealing significantly higher scavenging activity of the Yukon Gold periderm especially after 7 days of wounding.
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a worldwide food staple, but substantial waste accompanies the cultivation of this crop due to wounding of the outer skin and subsequent unfavorable healing conditions. Motivated by both economic and nutritional considerations, this metabolite profiling study aims to improve understanding of closing layer and wound periderm formation and guide the development of new methods to ensure faster and more complete healing after skin breakage. The polar metabolites of wound-healing tissues from four potato cultivars with differing patterns of tuber skin russeting (Norkotah Russet, Atlantic, Chipeta, and Yukon Gold) were analyzed at three and seven days after wounding, during suberized closing layer formation and nascent wound periderm development, respectively. The polar extracts were assessed using LC-MS and NMR spectroscopic methods, including multivariate analysis and tentative identification of 22 of the 24 biomarkers that discriminate among the cultivars at a given wound-healing time point or between developmental stages. Differences among the metabolites that could be identified from NMR- and MS-derived biomarkers highlight the strengths and limitations of each method, also demonstrating the complementarity of these approaches in terms of assembling a complete molecular picture of the tissue extracts. Both methods revealed that differences among the cultivar metabolite profiles diminish as healing proceeds during the period following wounding. The biomarkers included polyphenolic amines, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids and glycoalkaloids. Because wound healing is associated with oxidative stress, the free radical scavenging activities of the extracts from different cultivars were measured at each wounding time point, revealing significantly higher scavenging activity of the Yukon Gold periderm especially after 7 days of wounding.
The economic importance
of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) has grown considerably
during the 12 000 years since
its domestication and cultivation in the region of Southern Peru and
Northern Bolivia around Lake Titicaca,[1,2] bringing it
to its current status as a staple crop in many developing and developed
countries.[3]A central challenge faced
during cultivation, harvest, and storage
of potatoes concerns the wounding of their surfaces and subsequent
suboptimal healing conditions that lead to significant crop losses.[4] Thus, it is of considerable commercial and nutritional
importance to identify biomarkers that indicate the progress and completeness
of healing for wounded surfaces in potato.[5] As a rule, by 1 day after potato tuber wounding, a suberized closing
layer begins to form as an initial healing response and by 5–6
days, it is fully developed. During the latter time period the nascent
wound phellem layers emerge, signaling the beginning of wound periderm
development for both russet and smooth skin genotypes.[5,6] Because the wound-healing response varies with cultivar and species,
four different cultivars with distinctive russeting features (Norkotah
Russet, Atlantic, Chipeta, and Yukon Gold) (Table 1) were chosen to compare metabolite profiles during closing
layer formation and wound periderm initiation, at time points 3 and
7 days after wounding, respectively. Russeted characteristics are
morphological features characterized by rough skin texture and proposed
to arise from expansion of the tuber that results in cracking of the
skin.[7] Some breeding programs have selected
in favor of these traits.[8] The four cultivars
selected for study also have contrasting commercial importance: Atlantic
and Chipeta are used primarily for processing into potato chips, whereas
Norkotah Russet and Yukon Gold are used for baking. The last one is
considered to be a leading cultivar because of its high yield, attractive
appearance and excellent storability.
Table 1
Potato
Cultivars for Wound Healing
Study
cultivar
flesh
periderm russeting
skin
Norkotah Russet
white
russeted and netted
dark tan
Atlantic
white
lightly netted to
heavily scaled
white
Chipeta
white
small russeted areas
light
to buff
Yukon Gold
light yellow
smooth, finely flaked, yellowish white
yellowish
Although an increasing
number of metabolite profiling reports have
appeared for potatoes in recent years,[9−12] the literature on compositional
analysis of wound-induced potato tubers[13] and especially polar extracts remains fairly sparse.[13,14] In a study performed by Yang et al.,[14] both polar and nonpolar wound-healing extracts from the Russet Burbank
cultivar were analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
(GC-MS) and metabolomics methods. Nonetheless, extensions of these
profiling analyses across cultivars are desirable from both methodological
and agricultural standpoints: high performance liquid chromatography
(LC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) may offer more robust
characterization of the healing tissue extracts, and cultivar comparisons
could show metabolite differences that reveal the molecular underpinnings
of russeted skin character and/or wound-induced stress response.In turn, the oxidative stress due to wounding can unleash the production
of antioxidant compounds, which are present in the native skin of
potato and have already found practical use as preservatives in the
food industry.[3] Antioxidant evaluation
of a purple potato cultivar using a diphenyl picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) scavenging assay showed that the activity increased
as a result of wounding,[15] but a trend
of decreasing DPPH• scavenging activity was reported
in a wounded Norkotah Russet sample.[16] This
inconsistency could reflect a shortcoming of the DPPH• assay, whereby steric hindrance could compromise assessments of
scavenging activities for larger phytochemical constituents. Thus,
the current experimental design couples LC-MS and NMR metabolite profiling
for four cultivars, at day 3 and day 7 after wounding, with broadly
applicable extended-duration scavenging assays using 2,2′-Azinobis
(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid ammonium salt) (ABTS•+).[17] By coordinating information on chemical
composition and antioxidant activity, the long-term goal is to develop
improved methods that ensure rapid and complete wound healing for
various potato cultivars while also providing a rich source of chemical
compounds with potential application as functional foods.[3,18,19]
Materials
and Methods
Reagents
HPLC-MS grade acetonitrile, water, chloroform
and methanol (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ) and formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO) were used for LC-MS/MS and time-of-flight (TOF-MS)
analysis. 2,2′-Azinobis (3-ethylbenzothi-azoline-6-sulfonic
acid ammonium salt) (ABTS), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8 tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic
acid (TCI, Tokyo, Japan), and potassium peroxosulfate (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO) were utilized in the antioxidant assay.
Plant Material
Potato tuber cultivars from the 2011
crop year were provided by Joe Nuñez, University of California
Cooperative Extension (Davis, CA). Table 1 summarizes
the differences in overall phenotypic characteristics that were used
in making these selections.
Sample Preparation
Freshly harvested
potato tubers
were peeled, and the internal flesh tissues were sectioned longitudinally
with a mandolin slicer to obtain slices about 5 mm thick. The central
part of the tuber was set aside to avoid the internal medulla. Slices
were placed on wet cellulose filter paper and left for 3 or 7 days
of healing on wire netting supports within closed plastic boxes at
25 °C. Water was added at the bottom of the boxes to maintain
humidity; healing proceeded in the dark. The brown surface layer of
wound-healing tissue was collected carefully using a flat spatula,
making efforts to avoid flesh (parenchyma) contamination. The samples
were harvested at 3 and 7 days after wounding, representing the early
healing tissue in which the suberized closing layer and the wound
periderm were developing, respectively. Harvested wound periderm samples
were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80
°C until processed. For processing, samples were ground under
liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried, and again stored at −80 °C.[20]The samples were prepared for chemical
analysis using a modification of the method employed by Choi et al.,
which enables concurrent extraction and partitioning of polar and
nonpolar constituents and has become an established protocol for metabolomic
studies of plant materials.[20,21] Samples of 10 mg (dry
weight) each were placed in jn glass vials (Microliter Analytical
Supplies, Suwanee, GA) and extracted with 2 mL of 60% (v/v) methanol–water
by pan ultrasonication (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT) for 1 min,
followed by addition of 2 mL chloroform and sonication again for 1
min. Each extract was then incubated at room temperature in a shaker
for 10 min, followed by tabletop centrifugation (Beckman Coulter,
Fullerton, CA) at 3000 rpm to produce three separate phases: soluble
polar, soluble nonpolar, and an interphase of suspended particulates.
Six replicate extracts were prepared per cultivar for each wound-healing
time point (day 3 and day 7). The upper soluble polar extracts were
removed carefully with a glass Pasteur pipet and dried under a flow
of nitrogen for a few hours. This phase was selected for the current
analysis.
NMR
Aliquots of the polar extract were dried and reconstituted
using a 100 mM pH 7.4 phosphate buffer in D2O that contained
the internal standard DSS (0.01 mg/mL). Spectra were recorded using
a Bruker AVANCE PLUS spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Karlsruhe, Germany)
operating at a 1H frequency of 800 MHz and equipped with
a cryomicroprobe that accommodates 1.7 mm o.d. sample tubes (Norell,
Landisville, NJ). Acquisition of the spectra was achieved using TOPSPIN
version 3.1 software and an NMR SAMPLEJET accessory for automated
sample changing. 1H NMR data were collected for the polar
extracts at 298 K with a constant receiver gain, using 512 scans with
4 initial “dummy” scans, a recycle delay of 1.0 s between
acquisitions, and presaturation of the residual water signal set to
a chemical shift of 4.695 ppm. The spectral window after Fourier transformation
and signal conditioning was 14 ppm defined by 32K data points.
LC-MS
Liquid chromatography was conducted with a Shimadzu
UFLC (Shimadzu U.S.A., Canby, OR) equipped with two LC-20 AD pumps,
a SIL-20AC automatic injector, a CBM-20A communication bus module
and a CTO-20AC column oven. The separations were carried out using
a 150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 3.0 μm AscentisR C18 column (Supelco
Analytical, Bellefonte, PA). Each analysis was performed by injecting
a 10 μL sample into the column and eluting at 35 °C with
a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Six replicate extracts per cultivar were
analyzed for each wound-healing time point, and each sample was injected
twice. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% aqueous formic acid (A)
and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) using a program of nonlinear
gradient elution: 2% B (0–5 min), 2–10% B (5–8
min), 10–15% B (8–13 min), 15% B (13–25 min),
15–30% B (25–28 min), 30–40% B (28–50
min), and 40–100% B (50–60 min).The LC system
was interfaced to an Applied Biosystems 4000 Q Trap mass spectrometer
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for LC-MS/MS measurements. The
source type was electrospray ionization (ESI) and the source temperature
was 300 °C. Mass spectra were acquired in both positive
and negative modes over the range m/z 100–1300. Full scan, MS2, and MS3 data
were collected using these settings. The optimized declustering potentials
were 66 V in the positive mode and −140 V in the negative mode;
chlorogenic acid and rutin, compounds reported previously in potatoes,[9,11,22] were used as reference standards.
Analyst 1.4.2 software was used for data processing.
Fractionation
of the Extracts
The polar extracts were
fractionated using an Agilent 1200 series HPLC-PDA liquid chromatography
system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) equipped with a G1322A
degasser, G1311A quaternary pump, G1316A thermostatically controlled
chamber, G1315B diode array detector, and G1364C analytical fractionator.
The mobile phase composition, flow rate, gradient, and column were
as described above. Fractions were collected at 30-s intervals throughout
a 60 min chromatographic run. This fractionation protocol was repeated
several times to generate sufficient material that could be concentrated
and analyzed by TOF-MS to obtain the exact mass of the compounds under
investigation.
TOF-MS
Chromatographic fractions
from the polar extracts
were injected directly into a Waters LCT premier XE TOF mass spectrometer
(Micromass, Manchester, U.K.) using a Harvard 11 Plus Single Syringe
Pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) equipped with an ESI interface
and controlled by MassLynx V4.1 software. Mass spectra were acquired
in both positive and negative modes over the range m/z 100–1300. The capillary voltages were
set at 4000 V for both acquisition modes. Nitrogen gas flowing at
300 L/h was used for both the nebulizer and in desolvation. The desolvation
temperature was 150 °C, and the source temperature was 80 °C.
For the dynamic range enhancement (DRE) lockmass, a solution of leucine
enkephalin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was infused by a secondary
reference probe at 200 pg/mL in acetonitrile/water (1:1 v/v) containing
0.1% formic acid with the help of a second LC pump (Waters 515 HPLC).
The reference mass was determined once every five scans for both positive
and negative data collection; both types of ESI data were collected
using a scan time of 0.2 s and an interscan time of 0.01 s.
ABTS•+ Scavenging
The ABTS•+ scavenging
activity was assessed according to the method described
by Re et al.[17] with minor modifications.
ABTS•+ was generated by reacting an aqueous ABTS
solution (7 mM) with K2S2O8 (2.45 mM) in the dark for 12–16 h at ambient temperature
and adjusting the absorbance at 734 nm to 0.70 (±0.02) with ethanol.
To a 2 μL aliquot of the periderm extract of interest was added
198 μL of ABTS•+ reagent; the absorbance was
recorded at 734 nm after initial mixing and subsequently at 5 min
intervals (45 min in total) using a Spectramax microplate
reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The percentage inhibition
values for different concentrations were calculated using the following
equation:A plot of percentage inhibition versus
concentration was made for the reference standard, 6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic
acid (Trolox). On the basis of this plot, the Trolox equivalent antioxidant
capacity (TEAC, μmol Trolox/g dried sample) values were calculated
for each extract.
Preprocessing of NMR Data
For metabolite
profiling
analysis, MESTREC software version 4.9.9.9 (Mestrelab Research, Escondido,
CA) was used to correct the phase and baseline of each spectrum and
to remove the spectral region containing the remaining water signal.
The spectra were then subjected to binning and integrated in 0.04
ppm regions. The integrated area of each bin/bucket was normalized
with respect to the area of all bins.
Preprocessing of LC-MS
Data
MZmine version 2.4 (VTT
Technical Research Center, Helsinki, Finland and Turku Center for
Biotechnology, Turku, Finland) was used to filter the spectra according
to retention time and m/z range.
Spectral deconvolution and feature detection were followed by peak
alignment and data normalization.[23] The
region of the chromatogram between 0 and 4 min, which contains primary
metabolites reported previously,[14] was
not included in the current PCA analysis.
Multivariate Data Analysis
Principal component analysis
(PCA) of the normalized data from NMR and MS experiments was carried
out using Simca-P+ software version 13.0 (Umetricas, Umeå,
Sweden) and Pareto scaling.[20] In addition,
the data were subjected to orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate
analysis (OPLS-DA), in which data from a particular cultivar were
assigned to one class that was then compared with another class comprising
the remaining cultivars. The corresponding S-plots displayed extreme
“wings” that yielded chemical shifts or mass-to-charge
(m/z) ratios of the biomarkers that
contribute to compositional differences among the tissue samples (Figure 1). These variables were evaluated individually using
variable line plots to ascertain if the markers were unique to a particular
cultivar at a specified wounding time point (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the experimental design, including
typical data and statistical multivariate analyses including PCA,
OPLS-DA and S-plot analysis of liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry
(LC-MS) data (total ion current (TIC) chromatograms in positive mode),
leading to the detection of marker ions. Stacked LC-MS chromatograms
of the polar extracts each represent average data from six biological
replicates from day 3 potato wound periderm samples, color coded for
Norkotah Russet (blue), Atlantic (red), Chipeta (green), and Yukon
Gold (gold). Statistical procedures are detailed in the text.
Schematic representation of the experimental design, including
typical data and statistical multivariate analyses including PCA,
OPLS-DA and S-plot analysis of liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry
(LC-MS) data (total ion current (TIC) chromatograms in positive mode),
leading to the detection of marker ions. Stacked LC-MS chromatograms
of the polar extracts each represent average data from six biological
replicates from day 3 potato wound periderm samples, color coded for
Norkotah Russet (blue), Atlantic (red), Chipeta (green), and Yukon
Gold (gold). Statistical procedures are detailed in the text.
Tentative Metabolite Structural
Identification
The
markers were then characterized using mass and fragmentation data
(MS, MS/MS and MS/MS/MS) from the 4000Q Trap and the exact mass values
from the TOF-MS instrument, respectively. The marker compounds were
identified tentatively by comparison of these data with published
MS results using SciFinder Scholar and online databases such as PubChem,
ChemSpider and Metlin.To check the consistency of the MS-based
identifications with observed NMR data for the extract mixtures, ACD
software (ACD Laboratories, Toronto, Canada) was first used to simulate
the NMR spectra of the identified markers. The simulated 1H spectra of each compound were checked against the chemical shift
list derived for biomarkers by OPLS-DA and S-plot analysis of the
experimental NMR data for extract mixtures. For example, a biomarker
compound for the Atlantic day 3 extract was tentatively identified
as bis (dihydrocaffeoyl) spermidine, compound 5, (474.4 m/z; 18.1 min) (Figure 1 and Table 2). The simulated 1H chemical shifts for this MS-derived biomarker were compared with
marker shifts derived from the experimentally observed NMR data for
the extract mixture.
Table 2
Biomarkers for Polar
Extracts of Wound-Healing
Potato Periderms
Exact mass data obtained from MS-TOF
analysis.
Fragmentation
data obtained from
LC-MS/MS analysis using a 4000Q Trap instrument.
Also among the biomarkers identified
in native periderms of these four cultivars (Huang et al., unpublished
observations).
Isomeric
compounds which were distinguished
from each other by their retention times and the intensities of their
mass fragmentation peaks.
The wound healing time point is
denoted by Wd3 or Wd7, and color coded depending on the cultivar(s)
specific for the biomarker. The coloring scheme denotes Atlantic (red),
Chipeta (green), Norkotah Russet (blue), or Yukon Gold (gold).
Marker compounds found in all four
cultivars that are specific to day 7 post wounding, which is associated
with nascent wound periderm development. The (+) sign indicates that
the compound in question is a marker for the day 7 time point.
Also among the metabolites identified
in native periderms of these four cultivars (Huang et al., unpublished
observations).
This compound
can be distinguished
from gas-phase dimer ions produced as artifacts during MS analysis:
the observed m/z value of its molecular
ion differs from a simple doubling of chlorogenic acid due to loss
of water consequent with dimer formation.
Exact mass data obtained from MS-TOF
analysis.Fragmentation
data obtained from
LC-MS/MS analysis using a 4000Q Trap instrument.Also among the biomarkers identified
in native periderms of these four cultivars (Huang et al., unpublished
observations).Isomeric
compounds which were distinguished
from each other by their retention times and the intensities of their
mass fragmentation peaks.The wound healing time point is
denoted by Wd3 or Wd7, and color coded depending on the cultivar(s)
specific for the biomarker. The coloring scheme denotes Atlantic (red),
Chipeta (green), Norkotah Russet (blue), or Yukon Gold (gold).Marker compounds found in all four
cultivars that are specific to day 7 post wounding, which is associated
with nascent wound periderm development. The (+) sign indicates that
the compound in question is a marker for the day 7 time point.Also among the metabolites identified
in native periderms of these four cultivars (Huang et al., unpublished
observations).This compound
can be distinguished
from gas-phase dimer ions produced as artifacts during MS analysis:
the observed m/z value of its molecular
ion differs from a simple doubling of chlorogenic acid due to loss
of water consequent with dimer formation.
Results and Discussion
Metabolic Fingerprinting
Visual inspection of the stacked 1H NMR spectra for
wound-healing tissue extracts from various
cultivars at days 3 and 7 (Figure 2 and Supporting Information (SI) Figure S1, respectively)
shows good consistency among the six replicates for each cultivar,
a high degree of instrumental reproducibility, and modest but clear
differences among the four cultivars. A more rigorous multivariate
analysis of the data provides essential unbiased confirmation of these
differences. The PCA-associated score plots for the NMR data (Figure 3) demonstrate that the polar metabolites for each
of the four cultivars form distinct and nonoverlapping clusters, more
distinct at day 3 compared with day 7 post wounding. To compare the
metabolic profiles at different wound-healing time points, PCA was
carried out for day-3 and day-7 NMR data together; the resulting score
plot (Figure 4) shows a clear separation of
metabolites at the two time points according to PC1. Again, a closer
convergence of the clusters for each cultivar is evident at day 7.
Figure 2
Stacked
800 MHz 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectra, showing average data from six biological replicates of polar
extracts from day 3 potato wound periderm samples, color coded for
Yukon Gold (gold), Norkotah Russet (blue), Chipeta (green), and Atlantic
(red). Vertical expansions of the aromatic and multiple-bonded region
between 6.0 and 8.0 ppm are shown in each inset.
Figure 3
PCA score plots for the NMR data from extracts of day 3 (A) and
day 7 (B) wound-healing samples, color coded for Atlantic (red), Chipeta
(green), Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold) potato periderms.
Figure 4
PCA score plot for the overall NMR data from
extracts of the four
cultivars at both day 3 (circles) and day 7 (triangles) post wounding
(W). The samples are coded for Atlantic (red, a), Chipeta (green,
c), Norkotah Russet (blue, r), and Yukon Gold (gold, y).
Stacked
800 MHz 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectra, showing average data from six biological replicates of polar
extracts from day 3 potato wound periderm samples, color coded for
Yukon Gold (gold), Norkotah Russet (blue), Chipeta (green), and Atlantic
(red). Vertical expansions of the aromatic and multiple-bonded region
between 6.0 and 8.0 ppm are shown in each inset.PCA score plots for the NMR data from extracts of day 3 (A) and
day 7 (B) wound-healing samples, color coded for Atlantic (red), Chipeta
(green), Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold) potato periderms.PCA score plot for the overall NMR data from
extracts of the four
cultivars at both day 3 (circles) and day 7 (triangles) post wounding
(W). The samples are coded for Atlantic (red, a), Chipeta (green,
c), Norkotah Russet (blue, r), and Yukon Gold (gold, y).In an analogous fashion, Figure 2 and SI Figure S2 demonstrate consistency
among LC-MS
experiments on nominally identical samples and distinct signatures
for each of the four cultivars and wound-healing time points. Even
more definitively than via NMR data, score plots obtained from PCA
analysis of the LC-MS experiments show polar metabolite differences
among the clusters corresponding to Russet Norkotah, Atlantic, Chipeta,
and Yukon Gold cultivars (Figure 5). As compared
with day 3 (Figure 5A), the convergent trend
of metabolite compositions at day 7 is demonstrated by both the LC-MS
score plot (Figure 5B) and the overall PCA
analysis for both healing time points (Figure 6), again aligning with the NMR-derived multivariate analysis (Figures 3 and 4). This convergence
of metabolite profiles with time, which has been observed previously
in GC-MS-based multivariate analysis of Russet Burbank periderms,[14] could reflect common biosynthetic pathways associated
with wounding in the four cultivars. That is, if the initially distinct
metabolite pools for the four cultivars accumulate a common set of
phytochemicals associated with wound induction, these common metabolites
will become increasingly dominant at later healing stages.
Figure 5
PCA score plots
for the LC-MS data from extracts of day 3 (A) and
day 7 (B) potato wound-healing samples, color coded for Atlantic (red),
Chipeta (green), Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold).
Figure 6
PCA score plot for the overall LC-MS data from
extracts of the
cultivars at both day 3 (circles) and day 7 (triangles) post wounding
(W). The periderm samples are coded for Atlantic (red, a), Chipeta
(green, c), Norkotah Russet (blue, r), and Yukon Gold (gold, y).
PCA score plots
for the LC-MS data from extracts of day 3 (A) and
day 7 (B) potato wound-healing samples, color coded for Atlantic (red),
Chipeta (green), Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold).PCA score plot for the overall LC-MS data from
extracts of the
cultivars at both day 3 (circles) and day 7 (triangles) post wounding
(W). The periderm samples are coded for Atlantic (red, a), Chipeta
(green, c), Norkotah Russet (blue, r), and Yukon Gold (gold, y).OPLS-DA analyses and their corresponding
S-plots, illustrated in
Figure 1, provide chemical insight into the
basis for variations in metabolic profiles. In particular, it is possible
to identify the NMR chemical shifts and/or MS ions corresponding to
metabolites (“biomarkers”) that accumulate or are specific
for a particular cultivar or wound-healing time point from the extremes
of the S-plots. By comparing the marker ions with published MS data
using SciFinder Scholar (https://scifinder.cas.org/scifinder) or other online databases, it was possible to tentatively identify
the polyphenolic amines, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids, and
glycoalkaloids listed in Table 2. A total of
22 of 24 biomarkers were identified by MS/MS and MS-TOF methods. As
noted in the Materials and Methods section,
early eluting primary metabolites were excluded from the current PCA
analysis.
Biomarkers for Cultivar Type
The majority of the identified
biomarkers for Atlantic and Norkotah Russet varieties, at both days
3 and 7 post wounding, are polyphenolic amines. Conversely, most of
the polyphenolic amine biomarkers are found in the Atlantic and Norkotah
Russet cultivars (Table 2). Polyphenolic amines
have been claimed previously to offer resistance to potato pathogens
such as Phytophthora infestans and Streptomyces
scabies.[24−26] Therefore, accumulation of these antimicrobial compounds
can offer protection at the wound site and aid in development of an
effective moisture barrier.The polyphenolic amine biomarkers
include derivatives of spermine, spermidine, tyramine, and putrescine.
Among these compounds, markers for closing layer formation include
kukoamine isomers (1, 2), feruloyl putrescine and its
isomer (3, 4), N1, N4-bis (dihydrocaffeoyl) spermidine (5), N1,N4,N8-tris (dihydrocaffeoyl) spermidine (6), feruloyl tyramine (7) and caffeoyl putrescine (8) for the Atlantic and/or Norkotah Russet cultivars.[24] By contrast, other phenolic amines are found
as biomarkers for these cultivars only after the closing layer has
been formed and wound periderm formation has been initiated: coumaryl
putrescine (9) for Atlantic and N1,N4,N12 tris(dihydrocaffeoyl)spermine (10) for Norkotah Russet,
respectively. Feruloyl tyramine (7) is a Norkotah Russet
marker at both day 3 and day 7 time points. Compounds 6, 9, and 10 are also markers for the day
7 wound-healing time point in Chipeta or Yukon Gold cultivars. The
polyphenolic amine biomarkers listed in Table 2 have been reported previously in the flesh of potato tubers.[10,11] Feruloyl tyramine and related compounds are associated with the
lesions and heavier skins formed by scab-infected potato tubers.[24,26] (The phenolic amineGrossamide (11), which is not a
cultivar marker but is upregulated for all four cultivars, is discussed
in the following section.) One additional unidentified biomarker (23) can be classified as a spermine derivative from its MS
data. Finally, several of the polyphenolic amines in Table 2 were also identified in native periderms (tuber
skin) from these four potato cultivars (noted as a for
biomarkers, e for nonbiomarker metabolites; Huang et al.,
unpublished observations).Kaempferol glycosides (12–14)
are detected as biomarkers for Norkotah Russet and Yukon Gold. Most
of the glycosides are present in Yukon Gold. All glycoside compounds
have been reported in potato peels[9] with
the exception of Potengriffioside (14), which was isolated
from Solanum crinitum Lam. tubers.[27] One common potato phenolic metabolite that is identified
as a biomarker for Yukon Gold and Norkotah Russet is chlorogenic acid
(15). Feruloyl quinic acid (16) is a marker
specific to Norkotah Russet at days 3 and 7; ferulic acid itself (17), which plays an integral role in suberin formation,[28,29] is a marker for the day 3 extracts of Yukon Gold. Both 15 and 17 have been reported previously in the polar extracts
from wound-healing Russet Burbank potato periderms.[14] Finally, the Atlantic and Chipeta cultivars exhibit a caffeoylquinic
acid dimer biomarker (18) in both 3- and 7-day wound-healing
samples.Glycoalkaloids, compounds 19–22, are identified as biomarkers for Chipeta and Norkotah
Russet cultivars.
Chaconine (19) and solanidine solatriose (20) are detected in day 3 and day 7 Chipeta samples, respectively,
whereas Leptinine II (21) is a marker for day 3 Norkotah
Russet polar extracts. Leptinine I (22) is a marker for
day 7 extracts in all four cultivars and should thus be viewed as
a marker associated with this later time point of wound-induced healing.
The glycoalkaloidschaconine, leptinine II, leptinine I, and solanidine
solatriose have been reported previously in the tubers of Norkotah
Russet potatoes.[12] Chaconine has also been
reported to be present in potato peels of diverse cultivars.[9,12] Taken together, the glycoalkaloid compounds are viewed as an important
class of potato biomarkers because of their demonstrated role in resistance
to pests and pathogens.[30] However, they
also show concentration-dependent toxicity in organisms ranging from
fungi to humans.[31,32] Due to their structural similarity
to steroidal hormones, glycoalkaloids are considered additionally
to be promising intermediates in the production of contraceptives
and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.[3] Glycoalkaloids have been reported to have a wide range of bioactivities,
including anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, and antipyretic
effects.[32]
Biomarkers for Wound-Healing
Time Point
Although the
current comparisons are limited to day-3 and day-7 time points, a
prior extended time course study of healing Russet Burbank tubers
reported a significantly different polar metabolic profile at day
0, the onset of wound induction.[14] OPLS-DA
and S-plot analysis of day-3 and day-7 wound-induced metabolite data
for the four cultivars permits the identification of compounds that
are more abundant at day 7, the healing time point related to the
development of the nascent wound-healing periderm.[5,6] These
compounds include several classes of phytochemical substances: polyphenolic
amines, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids and glycoalkaloids. A
kukoamine isomer (1), feruloyl putrescine isomer (4), N1,N4 bis(dihydrocaffeoyl) spermidine (5), grossamide
(11), kaempferol hexoside (12), chlorogenic
acid (15), ferulic acid (17), chaconine
(19) leptinine I (22), spermine derivative
(23) were all identified as markers specific to the day-7
healing time point., Thus, compounds produced in significantly larger
quantities at the day-7 time point compared with day 3 can be associated
with wound periderm development. Indeed, phenolic amines and glycoalkaloids
similar to 1, 4, 5, 11, 19, and 22 have been reported to offer
resistance against microbes, insects, and herbivores.[25,33] Therefore, their accumulation during wound periderm formation could
be part of the protective mechanism against infections.The
current results complement a prior GC-MS study of wound-healing samples
from Russet Burbank potato periderms, in which the majority of the
identified constituents were primary metabolites but phenolic compounds
such as chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, iso-chlorogenic
acid, caffeic acid, and coniferyl alcohol were also reported.[14] No phenolic amines, flavonoid glycosides, or
glycoalkaloids were identified in the earlier work, presumably because
silylation produced species that exceeded the detectable m/z ratio, were only partially derivatized, or underwent
side reactions rather than the desired formation of volatile derivatives.[34]
Methodological Challenges for Biomarker Identification
As shown in Figures 3–6, robust multivariate analyses can be conducted for polar
periderm extracts using either NMR or LC-MS data; chemical shifts
and mass-to-charge ratios of markers for cultivar type or wound-healing
time point can also be extracted from S-plots in OPLS-DA analyses
(Figure 1). For each of the 22 MS-derived biomarkers
identified by comparison with published mass spectral data (TOF, LC-MS,
and mass fragmentation) for potatoes or related plant species, we
were able to simulate an NMR spectrum; the prediction could then be
cross-checked against biomarker chemical shifts that had been determined
from the wings of the corresponding NMR-derived S-plots. This situation
is illustrated by the biomarkers for the Yukon Gold day 7 extract:
for feruloyl putrescine (3), N1,N4,N12 tris(dihydrocaffeoyl
spermine (10), kaempferol hexoside (12),
potengriffioside (14), and chlorogenic acid (15), the MS-based identifications and associated NMR spectral simulations
were supported by observed biomarker chemical shifts (e.g., 7.68,
7.48, 7.44, 7.32, 7.28, 7.20, 7.16, 7.04, 7.00, 6.96, 6.88, 6.84,
6.76, 6.72, 6.60, 6.56, 6.52, 6.40, 5.32, 4.26, 4.22, 3.90, 3.86,
3.82, 3.70, 3.38, 3.34, 3.30, 3.10, 2.22, 1.54, and 1.14 ppm).For biomarkers such as 23, however, the MS ion could
not be identified because no published literature was available; it
was possible to deduce its compound class from the associated MS fragments and to validate that supposition
from the NMR-derived biomarkers. Such novel compounds then remain
to be isolated and elucidated using standard but lengthy spectroscopic
procedures. Even more seriously, LC-MS could miss an oligomeric biomarker
i.e., give a false negative result, if the compound fails to ionize
and thus goes undetected. Either previously unreported MS marker ions
or biomarkers that do not ionize in MS experiments should be evident
if analysis of the NMR data reveals marker shifts that fail to match
the predictions for MS-identified compounds.Although 1H NMR methods have a broader detection range,[35] they suffer from considerably lower molar sensitivity
than MS. A pitfall associated with this limitation is illustrated
by the observed marker shifts at 5.40 and 5.44 ppm, which are consistent
with NMR spectra predicted for the leptinine II glycoalkaloid (21), a metabolite that is accessible by LC-MS but does not
satisfy biomarker criteria for the Yukon Gold day-7 polar periderm
extract. The limited sensitivity of NMR could render this compound
unobservable in the remaining cultivar samples, producing a false
positive among the NMR-derived biomarkers. Finally, NMR-based identification
of individual metabolites in an extract mixture is also challenged
by incomplete spectral resolution, even when multidimensional experiments
are conducted. Although a number of promising NMR-based metabolomic
identification approaches have been proposed in recent years,[36] they remain limited by the complexity of plant
extract mixtures and the scope of current structural data libraries.Complications such as those illustrated above reflect incomplete
structural databases for plant-derived materials as well as limited
MS ionization and NMR sensitivity capabilities, respectively, arguing
for use of a conservative dual-method analysis to improve the completeness
of the resulting structural profile for constituent metabolites.
ABTS•+ Scavenging Activity of Wound-Healing
Extracts
As noted above, the oxidative stress associated
with tuber wounding and the potential of potato-derived antioxidant
compounds as food preservatives[3] together
motivate quantitative assessments of such compounds in potato cultivar
samples. Polar extracts of day 3 and day 7 tissue samples were screened
for their free radical scavenging activities. All extracts exhibited
scavenging activity, and their activities increased with incubation
time (Figures 7 and 8). Thus, it may be deduced that the cultivars contain slow- as well
as fast-acting antioxidants, underscoring the need for an assay such
as ABTS•+ that measures the scavenging capability
of the extracts over an extended period of time.[17] The assay has additional advantages such as absence of
steric hindrance, a broad pH range, and minimal spectral interference
from other natural products,[37,38] distinguishing the
current investigation from previous antioxidant research on extracts
from potato peels.[15,18,19]
Figure 7
ABTS•+ scavenging activity of polar extracts
from day 3 potato wound periderm samples expressed as TEAC (μmol
Trolox/g dried sample), color coded for Atlantic (red), Chipeta (green),
Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold). Values are expressed
as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6).
The assay is described fully in the text.
Figure 8
ABTS•+ scavenging activity of polar extracts
from day 7 potato wound periderm samples expressed as TEAC (μmol
Trolox/g dried sample), color coded for Atlantic (red), Chipeta (green),
Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold). Values are expressed
as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6).
Note that the large standard error of the mean for Yukon day 7 extracts
corresponds to a percent error that is similar to the other extracts.
ABTS•+ scavenging activity of polar extracts
from day 3 potato wound periderm samples expressed as TEAC (μmol
Trolox/g dried sample), color coded for Atlantic (red), Chipeta (green),
Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold). Values are expressed
as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6).
The assay is described fully in the text.ABTS•+ scavenging activity of polar extracts
from day 7 potato wound periderm samples expressed as TEAC (μmol
Trolox/g dried sample), color coded for Atlantic (red), Chipeta (green),
Norkotah Russet (blue), and Yukon Gold (gold). Values are expressed
as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6).
Note that the large standard error of the mean for Yukon day 7 extracts
corresponds to a percent error that is similar to the other extracts.At day 3, the order of activity
among the cultivars was as follows:
Yukon Gold ≈ Norkotah Russet (not significantly different, P > 0.05) > Atlantic > Chipeta. The order of activity
was
changed at day 7, to Yukon Gold > Norkotah Russet > Atlantic
> Chipeta.
Overall, the extracts of Yukon Gold stood out for their high scavenging
activity, displaying the highest rates especially after 7 days of
wound healing. Although the scavenging capability for most varieties
is achieved early during closing layer development and maintained
at comparable levels as a functional periderm barrier begins to develop,
the Yukon Gold variety nearly doubles its scavenging activity at day
7. This increase in activity could be attributed to the accumulation
of antioxidant metabolite(s) during wound periderm development, where
the measured extract activity will represent the net effect of potentiation,
synergism and antagonism among components of a mixture of antioxidants.
The presence of biomarkers such as kaempferol hexoside (12), potengriffioside (14), and chlorogenic acid (15), which have established antioxidant activities,[39,40] could account for the high activity measured in the Yukon Gold extracts.
At day 3, extracts of both Yukon Gold and Norkotah Russet demonstrate
similar high scavenging activity so that analogously, antioxidant
biomarkers such as kaempferol dihexoside (13) potengriffioside
(14) chlorogenic acid (15), feruloylquinic
acid (16) and ferulic acid (17)[41,42] could be responsible for their robust scavenging activities.It is also instructive to compare the current antioxidant results
with a prior study of unprocessed, baked and chipped tubers from Yukon
Gold and Atlantic cultivars. The ABTS•+ scavenging
activities, reported as TEAC values for extracts of those three preparations,[43] were much smaller than values measured herein
for both day-3 and day-7 wound-healing tissue extracts from the same
cultivars (Table 3). This trend persists even
when the previously reported fresh-weight assessments are expressed
commensurately to our dry-weight values: the scavenging activities
of unprocessed tubers (presumably flesh and skin together) are ∼4–8
times lower than our late-time point wound sample, for instance. Although
a portion of these differences may reflect variations in methodology,
the most potent factors are likely to involve our focus on wound-healing
tissues and wound induction.
Table 3
Comparison of ABTS•+ Scavenging Activities of Tissue Extracts from Atlantic
and Yukon
Cultivarsa
cultivar
bakedc
chippedc
unprocessedc
dry unprocessedd
dry wound periderm
day 3
dry wound periderm day 7
Atlanticb
1.13 ± 0.12
0.09 ± 0.00
5.75 ± 0.02
57.5
189.28 ± 12.56
198.48 ± 16.01
Yukon Gold
2.30 ± 0.22
0.12 ± 0.00
6.59 ± 0.00
65.9
235.78 ± 9.51
507.38 ± 66.91
The scavenging activities of the
samples are expressed as TEAC (μmol Trolox/g dried sample).
The values are expressed as
mean
± standard error of the mean (n = 6).
Published TEAC values were measured
for tubers.[43]
Adjusted by estimating that the
tissue is 90%-by-weight water.
The scavenging activities of the
samples are expressed as TEAC (μmol Trolox/g dried sample).The values are expressed as
mean
± standard error of the mean (n = 6).Published TEAC values were measured
for tubers.[43]Adjusted by estimating that the
tissue is 90%-by-weight water.The significantly higher activity observed for the current samples
thus supports the potential of wound periderms as sources of antioxidants.
Among the studied cultivars, Yukon Gold followed by Norkotah Russet
may prove to be of highest value for future industrial applications.
Moreover, time-dependent trends in antioxidant assessment can be viewed
as a useful tool to monitor the wound-healing process in these potato
cultivars.
Conclusions and Prospectus
The current
study is the first report of secondary plant metabolites
including phenolic amines, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids, and
glycoalkaloids as biomarkers for closing layer formation and wound
periderm initiation from four potato cultivars with distinctive russeting
patterns. Analysis of polar extracts from these materials serves to
identify 22 of 24 biomarker compounds that discriminate among the
potato cultivars and between healing time points, also revealing the
complementary strengths of LC-MS and NMR profiling approaches.The most heavily russeted Norkotah Russet and Atlantic cultivars
are especially rich in polyphenolic amine biomarkers, compounds with
established resistance to potato pathogens.[24−26] During suberized
closing layer formation (3 days healing), the polyphenolic amine markers
are found preferentially in polar periderm extracts from the russeted
and netted cultivars, namely Norkotah Russet and Atlantic; that marker
class appears at the later day-7 wound-healing time point, if at all,
for the smoother Yukon Gold and Chipeta varieties. At the day-7 time
point after wound periderm formation has been initiated,[44] both NMR and LC-MS multivariate analyses show
significant convergence of the polar metabolite compositions for the
four cultivars, suggesting a common wound-healing response which could
be compatible with the similar up-regulation patterns reported for
cell wall and cell cycle genes during potato tuber wound healing for
contrasting potato genotypes and after different harvests.[5] Among the biomarkers for the extracts at day
7, during the formation of the suberized waterproofing barrier, we
find polyphenolic amines and glycoalkaloids that are known to confer
protection against potato pathogens, pests and herbivores.[25,32] Analysis of the corresponding nonpolar extracts and developing polymeric
solids, which can provide complementary information on tissue metabolism
after wound induction, will be presented elsewhere.The presence
of antioxidant polyphenolic amine, flavonoid glycoside,
and phenolic acid constituents among the biomarkers provides a molecular
rationale for the robust radical scavenging activity measured in developing
wound periderm extracts from cultivars such as Yukon Gold and Norkotah
Russet during wound healing. Nonetheless, the unique rise in day-7
scavenging capability for the Yukon Gold periderm extracts reveals
the possible roles of multiple metabolites and the likely interplay
of potentiating, synergistic, and antagonistic effects on antioxidant
activity. The antioxidants in potato peel have great potential as
preservatives in the food industry.[3] As
wound periderm formation is initiated, a variety of biomarkers including
phenolic amines and glycoalkaloids are found to accumulate; their
protective capabilities hold promise for improvements in agricultural
productivity.[32,33] In addition glycoalkaloids can
be potential intermediates for the production of contraceptive and
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,[3] and
they possess wide ranging bioactivities of interest in drug discovery
research.[32] Thus, in addition to the agricultural
significance of closing layer and wound periderm formation in potatoes,
the antioxidant and biological activities of the newly identified
wounding biomarkers make them potentially interesting to the food
and pharmaceutical industries.
Authors: John M Halket; Daniel Waterman; Anna M Przyborowska; Raj K P Patel; Paul D Fraser; Peter M Bramley Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Frank van der Kooy; Federica Maltese; Young Hae Choi; Hye Kyong Kim; Robert Verpoorte Journal: Planta Med Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Keyvan Dastmalchi; Linda Kallash; Isabel Wang; Van C Phan; Wenlin Huang; Olga Serra; Ruth E Stark Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 5.279