Literature DB >> 19605967

A randomized trial comparing hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma: a report on the first-year biochemical response.

Darius Norkus1, Albert Miller, Aista Plieskiene, Ernestas Janulionis, Konstantinas Povilas Valuckas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the first-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) response of 91 irradiated patients enrolled in a single-institution randomized trial comparing hypofractionated (HFRT) and conventionally fractionated (CFRT) external beam radiotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-four patients in the CFRT treatment arm were irradiated with 74 Gy in 37 fractions (2 Gy per fraction), and 47 in the HFRT arm were treated with 57 Gy, given in 13 fractions of 3 Gy plus 4 fractions of 4.5 Gy. The clinical target volume includes the prostate and a base of seminal vesicles. The proportions of patients who reached PSA nadir (nPSA) lower than or equal to 1.0 ng/mL (nPSA1) and 0.5 ng/mL (nPSA05) were compared.
RESULTS: There were 2 non-cancer-related deaths (1 in the CFRT and 1 in the HFRT treatment arms). Biochemical relapse after irradiation was defined in five cases (3 in the CFRT and 2 in the HFRT treatment arms) during a 12-month follow-up. The remaining 84 patients were analyzed. The proportions of patients reaching nPSA1 were 50% and 54.5% in the CFRT and HFRT treatment arms, respectively (chi-square P=0.843). The percentages of patients reaching nPSA05 were 25% and 18.2%, respectively (chi-square P=0.621). The trends toward increasing proportions of biochemical responders (both nPSA1 and nPSA05) during 12 months after radiotherapy were observed, but the difference between trends for treatment arms did not reach a statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: The preliminary results presented here demonstrate that HFRT schedule induces biochemical response rates comparable to those in the CFRT schedule during the first-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19605967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  9 in total

1.  Radiation treatment for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  David E Greene; Jyoti S Mayadev; Richard K Valicenti
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-06

2.  Who benefits from hypofractionated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: evidence from meta-analysis.

Authors:  Libin Sun; Linbin Sun; Shimiao Zhu; Yang Zhao; Hui Zhang; Zhiqun Shang; Ning Jiang; Gang Li; Yuanjie Niu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-06

Review 3.  The case for hypofractionation of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Winnifred M Wong; Kent E Wallner
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

4.  Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy is more effective and safe for localized prostate cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Cao; Yong-Jing Yang; Zhi-Wen Li; Hong-Fen Wu; Zhu-Chun Yang; Shi-Xin Liu; Ping Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-10

5.  Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel; Otávio Clark; Antônio Carlos Lima Pompeo; Francisco Flávio Horta Bretas; Marcus Vinicius Sadi; Ubirajara Ferreira; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2013-03-07

6.  Hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Chinsoo Cho; Robert Timmerman; Brian Kavanagh
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-03-07

7.  Efficacy and toxicity of external-beam radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Zhu; J Zhang; Y Liu; M Chen; P Guo; K Li
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Comparative efficacy and safety of treatments for localised prostate cancer: an application of network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tengbin Xiong; Rebecca M Turner; Yinghui Wei; David E Neal; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Assessment of non-inferiority with meta-analysis: example of hypofractionated radiation therapy in breast and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jane-Chloé Trone; Edouard Ollier; Céline Chapelle; Patrick Mismetti; Michel Cucherat; Nicolas Magné; Paul Jacques Zuffrey; Silvy Laporte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.