Literature DB >> 24997175

Targeted Physician Education Positively Affects Delivery of Nutrition Therapy and Patient Outcomes: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Ryan T Hurt1, Stephen A McClave2, David C Evans3, Chris Jones4, Keith R Miller4, Thomas H Frazier5, Mahad A Minhas6, Cynthia C Lowen7, Allyson Stout7, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil6, Paul J Matheson4, Glen A Franklin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a continuing epidemic among hospitalized patients. We hypothesize that targeted physician education should help reduce caloric deficits and improve patient outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective trial of patients (n = 121) assigned to 1 of 2 trauma groups. The experimental group (EG) received targeted education consisting of strategies to increase delivery of early enteral nutrition. Strategies included early enteral access, avoidance of nil per os (NPO) and clear liquid diets (CLD), volume-based feeding, early resumption of feeds postprocedure, and charting caloric deficits. The control group (CG) did not receive targeted education but was allowed to practice in a standard ad hoc fashion. Both groups were provided with dietitian recommendations on a multidisciplinary nutrition team per standard practice.
RESULTS: The EG received a higher percentage of measured goal calories (30.1 ± 18.5%, 22.1 ± 23.7%, P = .024) compared with the CG. Mean caloric deficit was not significantly different between groups (-6796 ± 4164 kcal vs -8817 ± 7087 kcal, P = .305). CLD days per patient (0.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.6 ± 0.9), length of stay in the intensive care unit (3.5 ± 5.5 vs 5.2 ± 6.8 days), and duration of mechanical ventilation (1.6 ± 3.7 vs 2.8 ± 5.0 days) were all reduced in the EG compared with the CG (P < .05). EG patients had fewer nosocomial infections (10.6% vs 23.6%) and less organ failure (10.6% vs 18.2%) than did the CG, but these differences did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of specific educational strategies succeeded in greater delivery of nutrition therapy, which favorably affected patient care and outcomes.
© 2014 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enteral nutrition; nutrition; nutrition support practice; nutrition support teams; outcomes research/quality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997175     DOI: 10.1177/0148607114540332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical nutrition in the hepatogastroenterology curriculum.

Authors:  Chris J J Mulder; Geert J A Wanten; Carol E Semrad; Palle B Jeppesen; Hinke M Kruizenga; Nicolette J Wierdsma; Matthijs E Grasman; Adriaan A van Bodegraven
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Survey of nil per os duration of patients admitted to the emergency department due to vomiting.

Authors:  Wen-Chieh Yang; Yu-Jun Chang; Ya-Chun Lin; Chun-Yu Chen; Yi-Chin Peng; Han-Ping Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Risks in Management of Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Units: A Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Magdalena Hoffmann; Christine Maria Schwarz; Stefan Fürst; Christina Starchl; Elisabeth Lobmeyr; Gerald Sendlhofer; Marie-Madlen Jeitziner
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.