Literature DB >> 24996687

Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.

Mireya Diaz1, James O Peabody2, Victor Kapoor2, Jesse Sammon2, Craig G Rogers2, Hans Stricker2, Zhaoli Lane3, Nilesh Gupta3, Mahendra Bhandari2, Mani Menon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports on long-term oncologic outcomes for patients who undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are scant, as for radical prostatectomy covering only the contemporary prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cancer control in men who underwent RARP at least 10 yr ago. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From 2001 to 2003, we followed 483 consecutive men with localized prostate cancer who underwent RARP at a high-volume tertiary center. INTERVENTION: RARP as first-line therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We calculated biochemical recurrence -free survival (BCRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Actuarial rates were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify variables predictive of biochemical recurrence (BCR), receipt of salvage therapy, and metastases. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were 108 patients with BCR at a median follow-up of 121 mo (interquartile range: 97-132). Actuarial BCRFS, MFS, and CSS rates at 10 yr were 73.1%, 97.5%, and 98.8%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, D'Amico risk groups or pathologic Gleason grade, stage, and margins were the strongest predictors of BCR depending on whether preoperative or postoperative variables were considered. The value of the detectable PSAs together with disease severity were independent predictors of receipt of salvage therapy, together with a persistent PSA for metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary patients with localized prostate cancer, RARP confers effective 10-yr cancer control. Disease severity and PSA measurements can be used to guide more personalized and cost-effective postoperative surveillance regimens. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy confers effective 10-yr cancer control for men with localized disease, similar to the open approach. Recurrence is best predicted by postoperative disease severity. Persistent disease signals the risk of progression likely requiring early salvage treatment; lower postoperative risk warrants protracted surveillance beyond 5 yr from surgery, and those with higher risk may require follow-up beyond 10 yr.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer control; Postoperative surveillance; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Robotics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996687     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

Review 1.  Novel Technologies in Urologic Surgery: a Rapidly Changing Scenario.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Peter Schatteman; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  What is next in robotic urology?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Baojun Wang; Qing Ai; Yu Zhang; Xiangjun Lv; Hongzhao Li; Xin Ma; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Salvage robotic prostatectomy and high risk disease: what else can we do?

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; D Cahill
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-25

5.  Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Deepansh Dalela; Akshay Sood; Jesse Sammon; Wooju Jeong; Burkhard Beyer; Nicola Fossati; Craig G Rogers; Mireya Diaz-Insua; James Peabody; Alexander Haese; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Alberto Briganti; Mani Menon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic nephron sparing surgery: a high-volume laparoscopic center experience on achieving 'trifecta' outcomes.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Arjun Sivaraman; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Ettore Di Trapani; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Facundo Uriburu Pizzaro; Steeve Doizi; Nathalie Cathala; Annick Mombet; Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; Jeffrey K Mullins; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Control and Survival after Robot-Assisted versus Open Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Padraic O'Malley; Bilal Chughtai; Abby Isaacs; Jialin Mao; Jason D Wright; Dawn Hershman; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Richard Ho; Mohummad M Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Thomas Frye; Amichai Kilchevsky; Michele Fascelli; Nabeel A Shakir; Raju Chelluri; Steven F Abboud; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Sandeep Sankineni; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High expression of SLCO2B1 is associated with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomoaki Terakawa; Eriko Katsuta; Li Yan; Nitesh Turaga; Kerry-Ann McDonald; Masato Fujisawa; Khurshid A Guru; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.