Literature DB >> 24996403

Appropriate timing of surgical intervention for the proximal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Ryoji Tauchi1, Shiro Imagama, Hidefumi Inoh, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Tokumi Kanemura, Koji Sato, Yuji Matsubara, Atsushi Harada, Yoshihito Sakai, Yudo Hachiya, Mitsuhiro Kamiya, Hisatake Yoshihara, Zenya Ito, Kei Ando, Kenichi Hirano, Akio Muramoto, Hiroki Matsui, Tomohiro Matsumoto, Junichi Ukai, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, Ryuichi Shinjo, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Ishiguro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcome after surgical treatment of patients with the proximal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) and to explore the appropriate timing for surgical intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive cohort of 41 patients who underwent surgical treatment for the proximal type of CSA between 1995 and 2011 at the Nagoya Spine Group Hospitals. We collected information regarding age, type of muscle atrophy, preoperative and final manual muscle test, duration of symptoms, high-intensity areas on T2-weighted MRI images, low-intensity areas on T1-weighted MRI images, levels of spinal canal stenosis, the compression lesion site, cervical kyphosis and surgical procedures (laminoplasty, anterior spinal fusion and posterior spinal fusion). Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify correlates of a poor outcome. To explore the appropriate timing for performing surgery, we analyzed the data using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The duration of CSA symptoms was 11.6 months on average. The surgical results were excellent for 25 patients, good for six, fair for nine and poor for one. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the duration of symptoms was statistically associated with a poor surgical outcome (OR 1.393, p = 0.011). ROC analysis demonstrated that 4.3 months from the onset of CSA symptoms was the appropriate time to undergo surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that we should recommend surgical intervention to patients with the proximal type of CSA within about 4 months after the onset of symptoms if conservative treatment has not been successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996403     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1504-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  9 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to prognosis of conservative and surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Inui; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Masatoshi Sumi; Koki Uno
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Foot drop due to lumbar degenerative conditions: mechanism and prognostic factors in herniated nucleus pulposus and lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yoichi Iizuka; Haku Iizuka; Satoshi Tsutsumi; Yumi Nakagawa; Takashi Nakajima; Yasunori Sorimachi; Tsuyoshi Ara; Masahiro Nishinome; Takayuki Seki; Kosuke Shida; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-03

3.  The cause of dissociated motor loss in the upper extremity with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  J J Keegan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy.

Authors:  Yasushi Fujiwara; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Yoshinori Fujimoto; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Naosuke Kamei; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy treated by anterior decompression. Three case reports.

Authors:  Kentaro Mori; Takuji Yamamoto; Yasuaki Nakao; Minoru Maeda
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Paul G Matz; Paul A Anderson; Langston T Holly; Michael W Groff; Robert F Heary; Michael G Kaiser; Praveen V Mummaneni; Timothy C Ryken; Tanvir F Choudhri; Edward J Vresilovic; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

7.  Anterior and posterior decompressive surgery for progressive amyotrophy associated with cervical spondylosis: a retrospective study of 51 patients.

Authors:  Kenzo Uchida; Hideaki Nakajima; Takafumi Yayama; Ryuichiro Sato; Shigeru Kobayashi; Yasuo Kokubo; Erisa S Mwaka; Hisatoshi Baba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-09

8.  Risk factors for a poor outcome following surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Shiro Imagama; Hidefumi Inoh; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yuji Matsubara; Atsushi Harada; Yudo Hachiya; Mistuhiro Kamiya; Hisatake Yoshihara; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Surgical outcome of drop foot caused by degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aono; Motoki Iwasaki; Tetsuo Ohwada; Shinya Okuda; Noboru Hosono; Takeshi Fuji; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Drop finger caused by 8th cervical nerve root impairment: a clinical case series.

Authors:  Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Tomoyuki Rokkaku; Masazumi Murakami; Yasushi Ijima; Junya Saito; Mitsuhiro Kitamura; Seiji Ohtori; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Masashi Yamazaki; Chikato Mannoji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wenqi Luo; Yueying Li; Qinli Xu; Rui Gu; Jianhui Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Repetitive nerve stimulation as a diagnostic aid for distinguishing cervical spondylotic amyotrophy from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Chaojun Zheng; Xiang Jin; Yu Zhu; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang; Xinlei Xia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predisposing factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  JingTao Zhang; Can Cui; Zhao Liu; Tong Tong; RuiJie Niu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Takahashi; Junya Hanakita; Manabu Minami; Yosuke Tomita; Tomoki Sasagasako; Ryo Kanematsu
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

6.  High cord signals on magnetic resonance and other factors predict poor outcomes of cervical spine surgery: A review.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-01-16

7.  Evaluation of Anterior Decompression Surgical Outcomes of Proximal-Type Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chang-Bo Lu; Zhen-Sheng Ma; Jin-Bo Hu; Xiao-Jiang Yang; Wei Wei; Yang Zhang; Wei Lei
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  The Association Between the Rotator Cuff Status and the Severity and Recovery of Weakness in the Shoulder Abductor Strength in a Case of Proximal Type Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy.

Authors:  Sho Ishiwata; Yoichi Iizuka; Hitoshi Shitara; Tokue Mieda; Eiji Takasawa; Daisuke Tsunoda; Yohei Kakuta; Akira Honda; Shunsuke Ito; Kazuhiro Inomata; Tsuyoshi Sasaki; Noritaka Hamano; Tsuyoshi Tajika; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-12-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.