Literature DB >> 16985439

Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy.

Yasushi Fujiwara1, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yoshinori Fujimoto, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi, Naosuke Kamei, Mitsuo Ochi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Case studies of patients with cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the surgical outcome of posterior decompression for this amyotrophy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spondylosis sometimes causes a characteristic severe muscular atrophy without sensory disturbance or lower-extremity dysfunction, which is the so-called "cervical spondylotic amyotrophy." However, response to treatment, especially to posterior decompression, has not been well understood.
METHOD: This study included 32 patients. All underwent posterior cervical laminoplasty, and 22 patients had an additional foraminotomy. Preoperative and postoperative muscle power and results of imaging and electrophysiologic studies were evaluated. The follow-up period averaged 78 months. Whether impingement was against the ventral nerve root (VNR) or anterior horn (AH) in the spinal cord was assessed according to these findings. These cases were divided into proximal type and distal type according to the most severely atrophic muscle and compared statistically.
RESULTS: Severe preoperative muscle atrophy was observed in the deltoid and biceps muscles of 24 patients (proximal type) and in the forearm and hand muscles of 8 patients (distal type). Impingements against the VNR and AH were observed in 21 and 28 cases, respectively, and 17 cases had impingement of both the VNR and AH. Improvements in muscle atrophy after surgery were observed in 25 cases. In proximal-type patients, muscle power improved in 92% of cases but was improved in only 38% of the distal-type cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty and foraminotomy were effective in the treatment of most patients with this syndrome, although the outcome in the distal type was inferior to that in the proximal type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985439     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240207.00747.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Authors:  Sheng-Dan Jiang; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Drop finger caused by 8th cervical nerve root impairment: a clinical case series.

Authors:  Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Tomoyuki Rokkaku; Masazumi Murakami; Yasushi Ijima; Junya Saito; Mitsuhiro Kitamura; Seiji Ohtori; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Masashi Yamazaki; Chikato Mannoji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Appropriate timing of surgical intervention for the proximal type of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Shiro Imagama; Hidefumi Inoh; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yuji Matsubara; Atsushi Harada; Yoshihito Sakai; Yudo Hachiya; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Hisatake Yoshihara; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Kenichi Hirano; Akio Muramoto; Hiroki Matsui; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Junichi Ukai; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Ryuichi Shinjo; Hiroaki Nakashima; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-05

4.  Surgical outcomes for distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 43 cases.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Yamada; Toshitaka Yoshii; Shuta Ushio; Takashi Taniyama; Takashi Hirai; Hiroyuki Inose; Kenichiro Sakai; Shigeo Shindo; Yoshiyasu Arai; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wenqi Luo; Yueying Li; Qinli Xu; Rui Gu; Jianhui Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Repetitive nerve stimulation as a diagnostic aid for distinguishing cervical spondylotic amyotrophy from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Chaojun Zheng; Xiang Jin; Yu Zhu; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang; Xinlei Xia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Risk factors for a poor outcome following surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Shiro Imagama; Hidefumi Inoh; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yuji Matsubara; Atsushi Harada; Yudo Hachiya; Mistuhiro Kamiya; Hisatake Yoshihara; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Does the type of T2-weighted hyperintensity influence surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A review.

Authors:  Aditya Vedantam; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Evaluation of characteristics and surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.

Authors:  Hong-Li Wang; Heng-Chao Li; Jian-Yuan Jiang; Fei-Zhou Lū; Wen-Jun Chen; Xiao-Sheng Ma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Pattern Differences of Small Hand Muscle Atrophy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Mimic Disorders.

Authors:  Jia Fang; Ming-Sheng Liu; Yu-Zhou Guan; Hua Du; Ben-Hong Li; Bo Cui; Qing-Yun Ding; Li-Ying Cui
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.