Literature DB >> 24995719

Neuromuscular response differences to power vs strength back squat exercise in elite athletes.

R Brandon1,2, G Howatson3,4, F Strachan5, A M Hunter2.   

Abstract

The study's aim was to establish the neuromuscular responses in elite athletes during and following maximal 'explosive' regular back squat exercise at heavy, moderate, and light loads. Ten elite track and field athletes completed 10 sets of five maximal squat repetitions on three separate days. Knee extension maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC), rate of force development (RFD) and evoked peak twitch force (Pt) assessments were made pre- and post-session. Surface electromyography [root mean square (RMS)] and mechanical measurements were recorded during repetitions. The heavy session resulted in the greatest repetition impulse in comparison to moderate and light sessions (P < 0.001), while the latter showed highest repetition power (P < 0.001). MIVC, RFD, and Pt were significantly reduced post-session (P < 0.01), with greatest reduction observed after the heavy, followed by the moderate and light sessions accordingly. Power significantly reduced during the heavy session only (P < 0.001), and greater increases in RMS occurred during heavy session (P < 0.001), followed by moderate, with no change during light session. In conclusion, this study has shown in elite athletes that the moderate load is optimal for providing a neuromuscular stimulus but with limited fatigue. This type of intervention could be potentially used in the development of both strength and power in elite athletic populations.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuromuscular; fatigue; recovery; resistance exercise; strength training; surface electromyography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24995719     DOI: 10.1111/sms.12289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  7 in total

1.  Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Wei-Peng Teo; Dale Harris; Brendan Major; Dan VanderWesthuizen; Ashlee M Hendy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Reliability of quadriceps surface electromyography measurements is improved by two vs. single site recordings.

Authors:  T G Balshaw; A Fry; T M Maden-Wilkinson; P W Kong; J P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial.

Authors:  Federico Linassi; Matthias Kreuzer; Eleonora Maran; Antonio Farnia; Paolo Zanatta; Paolo Navalesi; Michele Carron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Rate of Force Development as an Indicator of Neuromuscular Fatigue: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Samuel D'Emanuele; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Cantor Tarperi; Alberto Rainoldi; Federico Schena; Gennaro Boccia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Acute Neuromuscular and Hormonal Responses to Power, Strength, and Hypertrophic Protocols and Training Background.

Authors:  Johanna Kotikangas; Simon Walker; Sara Toivonen; Heikki Peltonen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Time Course of Recovery Following Resistance Exercise with Different Loading Magnitudes and Velocity Loss in the Set.

Authors:  Fernando Pareja-Blanco; Antonio Villalba-Fernández; Pedro J Cornejo-Daza; Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas; Juan José González-Badillo
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04

7.  Impact of resistance training status on trunk muscle activation in a fatiguing set of heavy back squats.

Authors:  David R Clark; Michael I Lambert; Chris Grigson; Angus M Hunter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.