Literature DB >> 33351856

Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial.

Federico Linassi1,2, Matthias Kreuzer2, Eleonora Maran1, Antonio Farnia3, Paolo Zanatta4, Paolo Navalesi1, Michele Carron1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aging affects pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of anesthetics, but age effects on Entropy-guided total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusions (TIVA-TCI) are not fully characterized. We compared aging effects on effective estimated brain concentration of Propofol (CeP) during TIVA-TCI Entropy-guided anesthesia, without neuromuscular blockade (NMB).
METHODS: We performed an observational, prospective, single-center study enrolling 75 adult women undergoing Entropy-guided Propofol-Remifentanil TIVA-TCI for breast surgery. Primary endpoint was the relationship between age and CeP at maintenance of anesthesia (MA) during Entropy-guided anesthesia. Secondary endpoints were relationships between age and CeP at arousal reaction (AR), return of consciousness (ROC) and explicit recall evenience. We calculated a linear model to evaluate the age's impact on observational variable and performed pairwise tests to compare old (≥65 years, n = 50) and young (<65 years, n = 25) patients or patients with and without an AR.
RESULTS: We did not observe age-related differences in CeP during MA, but CeP significantly (p = 0,01) decreased with age at ROC. Entropy values during MA increased with age and were significantly higher in the elderly (RE: median 56[IQR49.3-61] vs 47.5[42-52.5],p = 0.001; SE: 51.6[45-55.5] vs 44[IQR40-50],p = 0.005). 18 patients had an AR, having higher maximum RE (92.5[78-96.3] vs 65[56.5-80.5],p<0.001), SE (79[64.8-84] vs 61[52.5-69],p = 0.03, RE-SE (12.5[9.5-16.5] vs 6 [3-9],p<0.001.
CONCLUSION: Older age was associated with lower CeP at ROC, but not during MA in unparalysed patients undergoing breast surgery. Although RE and SE during MA, at comparable CeP, were higher in the elderly, Entropy, and in particular an increasing RE-SE, is a reliable index to detect an AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33351856      PMCID: PMC7755218          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  31 in total

1.  Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets.

Authors:  Harald Hentschke; Maik C Stüttgen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Unresponsiveness ≠ unconsciousness.

Authors:  Robert D Sanders; Giulio Tononi; Steven Laureys; Jamie W Sleigh
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Changes in a surgical stress index in response to standardized pain stimuli during propofol-remifentanil infusion.

Authors:  M M R F Struys; C Vanpeteghem; M Huiku; K Uutela; N B K Blyaert; E P Mortier
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  A failure of M-Entropy to correctly detect burst suppression leading to sevoflurane overdosage.

Authors:  S M Hart; C R Buchannan; J W Sleigh
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.669

5.  The Ageing Brain: Age-dependent changes in the electroencephalogram during propofol and sevoflurane general anaesthesia.

Authors:  P L Purdon; K J Pavone; O Akeju; A C Smith; A L Sampson; J Lee; D W Zhou; K Solt; E N Brown
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  The topography of awareness: a classification of intra-operative cognitive states.

Authors:  M Wang; A G Messina; I F Russell
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers.

Authors:  T W Schnider; C F Minto; P L Gambus; C Andresen; D B Goodale; S L Shafer; E J Youngs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development.

Authors:  C F Minto; T W Schnider; T D Egan; E Youngs; H J Lemmens; P L Gambus; V Billard; J F Hoke; K H Moore; D J Hermann; K T Muir; J W Mandema; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in cardiac anaesthesia: influence of age on predicted effect-site concentrations.

Authors:  A Ouattara; G Boccara; S Lemaire; U Köckler; M Landi; E Vaissier; P Léger; P Coriat
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Facial muscle activity, Response Entropy, and State Entropy indices during noxious stimuli in propofol-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide-remifentanil anaesthesia without neuromuscular block.

Authors:  A J Aho; A Yli-Hankala; L-P Lyytikäinen; V Jäntti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Makam S Harsha; Pradeep K Bhatia; Ankur Sharma; Priyanka Sethi
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.