Literature DB >> 2499541

Clearance of Cryptococcus neoformans from immunologically suppressed mice.

J W Murphy1.   

Abstract

To assess the effects of cryptococcal antigen-induced immunosuppression on a Cryptococcus neoformans infection, CBA/J mice were injected intravenously with saline or suppressive doses of cryptococcal antigen (CneF) at weekly intervals and were then infected with viable C. neoformans cells. By the second week after infection, the cryptococcal antigen-injected mice had suppressed anticryptococcal delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses compared with the responses of the saline-treated, infected control mice. In addition, the immunosuppressed mice had higher numbers of cryptococcal CFU cultured from their lungs, livers, spleens, lymph nodes, and brains than did the control animals. A direct correlation of suppression of the anticryptococcal DTH response and reduced clearance of cryptococci from tissues was also observed after mice were given a single intravenous injection of CneF and infected. To determine whether or not the cryptococcal antigen was specifically reducing the clearance of C. neoformans or had a more generalized effect, mice were injected with saline or suppressive doses of CneF, infected with Listeria monocytogenes, and then followed daily for 7 days for the clearance of L. monocytogenes from spleens and on day 7 for DTH reactivity to Listeria antigen. There were no differences between the saline- and CneF-treated mice with respect to anti-Listeria DTH responses or clearance of L. monocytogenes from spleens, indicating that CneF was not altering natural resistance mechanisms responsible for early clearance of L. monocytogenes, nor was the CneF influencing the induction of the acquired immune response which was responsible for the late clearance of the bacteria. Together, these data indicate that the specific suppression of this cell-mediated immune response induced by cryptococcal antigen reduces the ability of the animals to eliminate the homologous organism (C. neoformans) but not a heterologous infectious agent, such as L. monocytogenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2499541      PMCID: PMC313825          DOI: 10.1128/iai.57.7.1946-1952.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  32 in total

1.  Mechanism of depletion of T lymphocytes from the spleen of mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Y Y Chan; C Cheers
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Identification of a macrophage antigen-processing event required for I-region-restricted antigen presentation to T lymphocytes.

Authors:  K Ziegler; E R Unanue
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Regulation of cell-mediated immunity in cryptococcosis. I. Induction of specific afferent T suppressor cells by cryptococcal antigen.

Authors:  J W Murphy; J W Moorhead
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Regulation of cell-mediated immunity in cryptococcosis. II. Characterization of first-order T suppressor cells (Ts1) and induction of second-order suppressor cells.

Authors:  J W Murphy; R L Mosley; J W Moorhead
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Regulation of cell-mediated immunity in cryptococcosis. III. Characterization of second-order T suppressor cells (Ts2).

Authors:  J W Murphy; R L Mosley
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Effective protection against Listeria monocytogenes and delayed-type hypersensitivity to listerial antigens depend on cooperation between specific L3T4+ and Lyt 2+ T cells.

Authors:  S H Kaufmann; E Hug; U Väth; I Müller
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Enhanced accumulation of inflammatory neutrophils and macrophages mediated by transfer of T cells from mice immunized with Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  C J Czuprynski; P M Henson; P A Campbell
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Host defense in cryptococcosis. III. Protection of nude mice by thymus transplantation.

Authors:  J R Graybill; L Mitchell; D J Drutz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Host-etiological agent interactions in intranasally and intraperitoneally induced Cryptococcosis in mice.

Authors:  T S Lim; J W Murphy; L K Cauley
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  In vitro propagation of antigen-specific T lymphocytes that adoptively transfer resistance to Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  R J Kearns; E C DeFreitas
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  13 in total

1.  Characterization of a cell population which amplifies the anticryptococcal delayed-type hypersensitivity response.

Authors:  P L Fidel; J W Murphy
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Antigen-induced protective and nonprotective cell-mediated immune components against Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  J W Murphy; F Schafer; A Casadevall; A Adesina
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Presentation of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide (GXM) on activated antigen-presenting cells inhibits the T-suppressor response and enhances delayed-type hypersensitivity and survival.

Authors:  R Blackstock; A Casadevall
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Idiopathic CD4+ T-lymphocytopenia in two patients.

Authors:  M Ostrowski; I E Salit; W L Gold; D Sutton; M L Montpetit; D Lepine; T Salas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Immunological aspects of fungal pathogenesis.

Authors:  G S Deepe; W E Bullock
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Cryptococcal meningitis: description of 3 cases and estimation of T-cell subsets.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Rui Huang; Huimin Guo; Jinli Zhang; Chen Dong; Hong Han
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Effects of immunization with Cryptococcus neoformans cells or cryptococcal culture filtrate antigen on direct anticryptococcal activities of murine T lymphocytes.

Authors:  S M Muth; J W Murphy
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Regulation of cytokine production during the expression phase of the anticryptococcal delayed-type hypersensitivity response.

Authors:  K L Buchanan; J W Murphy
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  T cell-mediated immunity in the lung: a Cryptococcus neoformans pulmonary infection model using SCID and athymic nude mice.

Authors:  G B Huffnagle; J L Yates; M F Lipscomb
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Characterization of cellular infiltrates and cytokine production during the expression phase of the anticryptococcal delayed-type hypersensitivity response.

Authors:  K L Buchanan; J W Murphy
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.