Literature DB >> 24995167

Study of incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal anomalies in a tertiary care hospital of eastern India.

Divya Agrawal1, Biswa Bhusan Mohanty1, Rachita Sarangi2, Sanjay Kumar3, Susanta Kumar Mahapatra4, Prafulla Kumar Chinara5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Congenital anomalies or malformations are anatomical. Structural or functional defects present at birth leads to physical and mental disabilities. With the advent of newer drugs, infectious diseases have taken the backseat and congenital defects have emerged as an important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. In India, anomalies of musculoskeletal system have been most commonly reported. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: With this in view, the present study was carried out to find the incidence and types of musculoskeletal defects in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. Various maternal factors were also correlated and analyzed. The purpose of this communication is to report these defects so as to help doctors and parents to prevent unexpected fetal loss and better parental counseling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in association with Department of Paediatrics of a tertiary care hospital in Odisha from for a period of 1 year. The newborns were examined within 1(st) three days of delivery for congenital malformations. The study group included all live borns along with still borns after 28 weeks of gestation or those dead babies whose weight was about 1kg. A thorough physical examination from head to toe was done to look for musculoskeletal defects within 24hrs of delivery. OBSERVATION AND
RESULTS: Out of total 7268 babies delivered, 116 babies were found to have anomalies. Thirty two of these had musculoskeletal defects. Talipes equinovarus was the commonest anomaly observed followed by polydactyly. The ratio of male babies with musculoskeletal defects to female babies was found to be 1.28:1.The malformed babies were mainly born to term mothers (77.6%), who were mostly unbooked (62.5%) and belonged to lower or middle class. But no significant relationship could be established between these factors and defects. Most mothers were in the age group of 20-35 years and there was no history of drug addiction, smoking, trauma or irradiation that could be related to the occurrence of congenital malformations.
CONCLUSION: It is concluded that better maternal care and improved standards of living have very little effect on the overall frequency of congenital malformations. For the better future of neonates an early recognition of correctable lesions is essential, which calls for a systematic approach to the study of musculoskeletal defects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital; Incidence; Musculoskeletal; Newborns

Year:  2014        PMID: 24995167      PMCID: PMC4079988          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7882.4380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  11 in total

1.  Congenital malformations in the newborn.

Authors:  B C Mathur; S Karan; K K Vijaya Devi
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.411

2.  The incidence of congenital malformations: a study of 5,964 pregnancies.

Authors:  R McINTOSH; K K MERRITT; M R RICHARDS; M H SAMUELS; M T BELLOWS
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Hospital-based data on perinatal and neonatal mortality in India.

Authors:  M Singh
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.411

4.  Congenital malformations. A report of a study of series of consecutive births in 24 centres.

Authors:  A C Stevenson; H A Johnston; M I Stewart; D R Golding
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Congenital malformations in new born. A prospective longitudinal study. A preliminary report on 1000 consecutive births.

Authors:  S Saifullah; R K Chandra; I C Pathak; G I Dhall
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 1.411

6.  East-West differentials in congenital malformations in India.

Authors:  P K Chinara; S Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Spectrum of congenital malformations in the newborn.

Authors:  M Singh; N K Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1980 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Congenital malformations.

Authors:  C O Carter
Journal:  WHO Chron       Date:  1967-07

9.  Congenital malformations and perinatal mortality in Bombay.

Authors:  P J Kolah; P A Master; L D Sanghvi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1967-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Prevalence & spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  S S Agarwal; U Singh; P S Singh; S S Singh; V Das; A Sharma; P Mehra; G K Malik; P K Misra
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pattern of Gross Congenital Malformations in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Northeast India.

Authors:  Jenita Baruah; Giriraj Kusre; Reeta Bora
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Congenital hand differences: Prevalence among school going children in Mangalore city.

Authors:  Mithun Pai G; B N Jagannath Kamath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-19

Review 3.  The Incidence, Diagnosis, and Treatment practices of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip (DDH) in India: A Scoping Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suresh Chand; Alaric Aroojis; Ritesh A Pandey; Ashok N Johari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  A national estimate of the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in India: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Prajkta Bhide; Anita Kar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  A silent epidemic of major congenital malformations in Tigray, northern Ethiopia: hospital-based study.

Authors:  Hayelom Kebede Mekonen; Yibrah Berhe; Birhane Alem Berihu; Hale Teka; Abera Hadgu; Letekirstos Gebregziabher; Etenat Halefom Berhe; Tony Magana; Afework Mulugeta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Screening for musculoskeletal system malformations and birth injuries in newborns: Results of a screening program in two hospitals in Shenzen, China.

Authors:  Zhu Xiong; Zhenhui Zhao; Hansheng Deng; Xin Qiu; Weiqing Li; Xiaodi Chen; Yu Tang; Shuai Han; Jiaxin Zhao; Ting Cai; Xian Liu; Shuaidan Zeng; Shengping Tang
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2022-06-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.