Literature DB >> 24994920

Impact of a clinical trial initiative on clinical trial enrollment in a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic.

Lydia T Madsen1, Deborah A Kuban1, Seungtaek Choi1, John W Davis1, Jeri Kim1, Andrew K Lee1, Delora Domain1, Larry Levy1, Louis L Pisters1, Curtis A Pettaway1, John F Ward1, Christopher Logothetis1, Karen E Hoffman1.   

Abstract

Clinical oncology trials are hampered by low accrual rates, with fewer than 5% of adult patients with cancer treated on study. Clinical trial enrollment was evaluated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center's Multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer Clinic (MPCC) to assess whether a clinical trial initiative, introduced in 2006, impacted enrollment. The trial initiative included posting trial-specific information in clinic, educating patients about appropriate clinical trial options during the treatment recommendation discussion, and providing patients with trial-specific educational information. The investigators evaluated the frequency of clinical trial enrollment for men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer seen in the MPCC from 2004 to 2008. Logistic regression evaluated the impact of patient characteristics and the clinical trial initiative on trial enrollment. The median age of the 1370 men was 64 years; 32% had low-risk, 49% had intermediate-risk, and 19% had high-risk disease. Overall, 74% enrolled in at least one trial and 29% enrolled in more than one trial. Trial enrollment increased from 39% before the initiative (127/326) to 84% (880/1044) after the trial initiative. Patient enrollment increased in laboratory studies (from 25% to 80%), quality-of-life studies (from 10% to 26%), and studies evaluating investigational treatments and systemic agents (from 6% to 15%) after the trial initiative. In multivariate analysis, younger men (P<.001) and men seen after implementation of the clinical trial initiative (P<.001) were more likely to enroll in trials. Clinical trial enrollment in the MPCC was substantially higher than that seen nationally in adult patients with cancer, and enrollment rates increased after the introduction of a clinical trial initiative.
Copyright © 2014 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24994920      PMCID: PMC4413899          DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  12 in total

1.  Impact of a multi-disciplinary patient education session on accrual to a difficult clinical trial: the Toronto experience with the surgical prostatectomy versus interstitial radiation intervention trial.

Authors:  Kris Wallace; Neil Fleshner; Michael Jewett; Joan Basiuk; Juanita Crook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Achieving high cancer control trial enrollment in the community setting: an analysis of the Community Clinical Oncology Program.

Authors:  Sara R Jacobs; Bryan J Weiner; Lori M Minasian; Marjorie J Good
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Successful subject recruitment for a prostate cancer behavioral intervention trial.

Authors:  Sue P Heiney; Swann Arp Adams; Bettina F Drake; Lisa H Bryant; Lynne Bridges; James R Hebert
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Outcomes of a cancer clinical trial matching service.

Authors:  Ted Gansler; Man Jin; Joseph Bauer; Katie Dahlquist; Larissa Tis; Katherine Sharpe; Robert Comis; Kimberly Naples; James Kepner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Factors and outcomes of decision making for cancer clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Barbara A Biedrzycki
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert L Comis; Jon D Miller; Carolyn R Aldigé; Linda Krebs; Ellen Stoval
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Enrolling older persons in cancer trials: the effect of sociodemographic, protocol, and recruitment center characteristics.

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Jeph Herrin; Natalie Wong; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cancer statistics, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Measurement of factors influencing the participation of patients with prostate cancer in clinical trials: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; Alan So; S Larry Goldenberg; Jonathan Berkowitz; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Cancer, comorbidities, and health-related quality of life of older adults.

Authors:  Ashley Wilder Smith; Bryce B Reeve; Keith M Bellizzi; Linda C Harlan; Carrie N Klabunde; Marni Amsellem; Arlene S Bierman; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2008
View more
  3 in total

1.  The trials of neuro-oncology clinical research.

Authors:  Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Optimal management of prostate cancer with lethal biology--state-of-the-art local therapy.

Authors:  Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Oncologic patients' misconceptions may impede enrollment into clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nethanel Asher; Ari Raphael; Ido Wolf; Sharon Pelles; Ravit Geva
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.