Literature DB >> 24994761

Loss of the two major leaf isoforms of sucrose-phosphate synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana limits sucrose synthesis and nocturnal starch degradation but does not alter carbon partitioning during photosynthesis.

Kathrin Volkert1, Stefan Debast1, Lars M Voll1, Hildegard Voll1, Ingrid Schießl1, Jörg Hofmann1, Sabine Schneider2, Frederik Börnke3.   

Abstract

Sucrose (Suc)-phosphate synthase (SPS) catalyses one of the rate-limiting steps in the synthesis of Suc in plants. The Arabidopsis genome contains four annotated SPS genes which can be grouped into three different families (SPSA1, SPSA2, SPSB, and SPSC). However, the functional significance of this multiplicity of SPS genes is as yet only poorly understood. All four SPS isoforms show enzymatic activity when expressed in yeast although there is variation in sensitivity towards allosteric effectors. Promoter-reporter gene analyses and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR studies indicate that no two SPS genes have the same expression pattern and that AtSPSA1 and AtSPSC represent the major isoforms expressed in leaves. An spsa1 knock-out mutant showed a 44% decrease in leaf SPS activity and a slight increase in leaf starch content at the end of the light period as well as at the end of the dark period. The spsc null mutant displayed reduced Suc contents towards the end of the photoperiod and a concomitant 25% reduction in SPS activity. In contrast, an spsa1/spsc double mutant was strongly impaired in growth and accumulated high levels of starch. This increase in starch was probably not due to an increased partitioning of carbon into starch, but was rather caused by an impaired starch mobilization during the night. Suc export from excised petioles harvested from spsa1/spsc double mutant plants was significantly reduced under illumination as well as during the dark period. It is concluded that loss of the two major SPS isoforms in leaves limits Suc synthesis without grossly changing carbon partitioning in favour of starch during the light period but limits starch degradation during the dark period.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; enzyme family; starch metabolism; sucrose biosynthesis; sucrose-phosphate synthase.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24994761      PMCID: PMC4400537          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  38 in total

1.  Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock.

Authors:  S L Harmer; J B Hogenesch; M Straume; H S Chang; B Han; T Zhu; X Wang; J A Kreps; S A Kay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Arabidopsis and primary photosynthetic metabolism - more than the icing on the cake.

Authors:  Mark Stitt; John Lunn; Björn Usadel
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Sucrose phosphate synthase genes in plants belong to three different families.

Authors:  Georg Langenkämper; Raymond W M Fung; Richard D Newcomb; Ross G Atkinson; Richard C Gardner; Elspeth A MacRae
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues.

Authors:  J Logemann; J Schell; L Willmitzer
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 5.  Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms.

Authors:  Filip Rolland; Elena Baena-Gonzalez; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

6.  Sucrose: metabolite and signaling molecule.

Authors:  Julia Wind; Sjef Smeekens; Johannes Hanson
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S J Clough; A F Bent
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Expression and evolutionary features of the hexokinase gene family in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Abhijit Karve; Bradley L Rauh; Xiaoxia Xia; Muthugapatti Kandasamy; Richard B Meagher; Jen Sheen; Brandon D Moore
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  ROLE AND REGULATION OF SUCROSE-PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE IN HIGHER PLANTS.

Authors:  Steven C. Huber; Joan L. Huber
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1996-06

10.  Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure.

Authors:  R D Gietz; R H Schiestl; A R Willems; R A Woods
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  20 in total

1.  Local adaptation (mostly) remains local: reassessing environmental associations of climate-related candidate SNPs in Arabidopsis halleri.

Authors:  C Rellstab; M C Fischer; S Zoller; R Graf; A Tedder; K K Shimizu; A Widmer; R Holderegger; F Gugerli
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Mucilaginibacter sp. K Improves Growth and Induces Salt Tolerance in Nonhost Plants via Multilevel Mechanisms.

Authors:  Di Fan; Donald L Smith
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Vernalization Alters Sink and Source Identities and Reverses Phloem Translocation from Taproots to Shoots in Sugar Beet.

Authors:  Cristina Martins Rodrigues; Christina Müdsam; Isabel Keller; Wolfgang Zierer; Olaf Czarnecki; José María Corral; Frank Reinhardt; Petra Nieberl; Karin Fiedler-Wiechers; Frederik Sommer; Michael Schroda; Timo Mühlhaus; Karsten Harms; Ulf-Ingo Flügge; Uwe Sonnewald; Wolfgang Koch; Frank Ludewig; H Ekkehard Neuhaus; Benjamin Pommerrenig
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  STOREKEEPER RELATED1/G-Element Binding Protein (STKR1) Interacts with Protein Kinase SnRK1.

Authors:  Madlen Nietzsche; Tiziana Guerra; Saleh Alseekh; Marcel Wiermer; Sophia Sonnewald; Alisdair R Fernie; Frederik Börnke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Spatial Profiles of Phosphate in Roots Indicate Developmental Control of Uptake, Recycling, and Sequestration.

Authors:  Abira Sahu; Swayoma Banerjee; Aditi Subramani Raju; Tzyy-Jen Chiou; L Rene Garcia; Wayne K Versaw
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Distinct nodule and leaf functions of two different sucrose phosphate synthases in alfalfa.

Authors:  Shanta Padhi; Martha M Grimes; Fabiola Muro-Villanueva; Jose Luis Ortega; Champa Sengupta-Gopalan
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Correlation analysis of the transcriptome of growing leaves with mature leaf parameters in a maize RIL population.

Authors:  Joke Baute; Dorota Herman; Frederik Coppens; Jolien De Block; Bram Slabbinck; Matteo Dell'Acqua; Mario Enrico Pè; Steven Maere; Hilde Nelissen; Dirk Inzé
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Dynamic Acclimation to High Light in Arabidopsis thaliana Involves Widespread Reengineering of the Leaf Proteome.

Authors:  Matthew A E Miller; Ronan O'Cualain; Julian Selley; David Knight; Mohd F Karim; Simon J Hubbard; Giles N Johnson
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Sucrose metabolism gene families and their biological functions.

Authors:  Shu-Ye Jiang; Yun-Hua Chi; Ji-Zhou Wang; Jun-Xia Zhou; Yan-Song Cheng; Bao-Lan Zhang; Ali Ma; Jeevanandam Vanitha; Srinivasan Ramachandran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Molecular insights into photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in Jatropha curcas grown under elevated CO2 using transcriptome sequencing and assembly.

Authors:  Sumit Kumar; Rachapudi Venkata Sreeharsha; Shalini Mudalkar; Prasad M Sarashetti; Attipalli Ramachandra Reddy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.