Shanta Padhi1, Martha M Grimes1,2, Fabiola Muro-Villanueva3, Jose Luis Ortega1, Champa Sengupta-Gopalan4. 1. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA. 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. 3. Department of Biochemistry, College of Agriculture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. 4. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA. csgopala@nmsu.edu.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: In alfalfa, the B form of Sucrose phosphate synthase synthesizes sucrose in the leaves while the A form participates in regulatory cycles of synthesis/breakdown of sucrose/starch in the root nodules. Sucrose (Suc) is the major stable product of photosynthesis that is transported to all heterotrophic organs as a source of energy and carbon. The enzyme sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) catalyzes the synthesis of Suc. Besides the leaves, SPS is also found in heterotrophic organs. There are two isoforms of SPS in alfalfa (Medicago sativa): SPSA and SPSB. While SPSA is expressed in the vasculature of all the organs and in the N2-fixing zone in the nodules, SPSB is exclusively expressed in the photosynthetic cells. Two classes of alfalfa transformants were produced, one with a gene construct consisting of the alfalfa SPSA promoter and the other with the SPSB promoter-both driving the maize SPS coding region-referred to as SPSA-ZmSPS and SPSB-ZmSPS, respectively. Both classes of transformants showed increased growth compared to control plants. The SPSB-ZmSPS transformants showed increased SPS protein levels and activity along with a significant increase in the Suc levels in the leaves. The SPSA-ZmSPS transformants showed an increase in the SPS protein level and enzyme activity both in the leaves and the nodules with no increase in Suc content in the leaves but a substantial increase in the nodules. Both SPSA and SPSB have unique roles in the nodules (sink) and leaves (source). SPSB is responsible for the synthesis of Suc in the photosynthetic cells and SPSA participates in a regulatory cycle in which Suc is simultaneously degraded and re-synthesized; both these functions contribute to plant growth in rhizobia nodulated alfalfa plants.
MAIN CONCLUSION: In alfalfa, the B form of Sucrose phosphate synthase synthesizes sucrose in the leaves while the A form participates in regulatory cycles of synthesis/breakdown of sucrose/starch in the root nodules. Sucrose (Suc) is the major stable product of photosynthesis that is transported to all heterotrophic organs as a source of energy and carbon. The enzyme sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) catalyzes the synthesis of Suc. Besides the leaves, SPS is also found in heterotrophic organs. There are two isoforms of SPS in alfalfa (Medicago sativa): SPSA and SPSB. While SPSA is expressed in the vasculature of all the organs and in the N2-fixing zone in the nodules, SPSB is exclusively expressed in the photosynthetic cells. Two classes of alfalfa transformants were produced, one with a gene construct consisting of the alfalfa SPSA promoter and the other with the SPSB promoter-both driving the maize SPS coding region-referred to as SPSA-ZmSPS and SPSB-ZmSPS, respectively. Both classes of transformants showed increased growth compared to control plants. The SPSB-ZmSPS transformants showed increased SPS protein levels and activity along with a significant increase in the Suc levels in the leaves. The SPSA-ZmSPS transformants showed an increase in the SPS protein level and enzyme activity both in the leaves and the nodules with no increase in Suc content in the leaves but a substantial increase in the nodules. Both SPSA and SPSB have unique roles in the nodules (sink) and leaves (source). SPSB is responsible for the synthesis of Suc in the photosynthetic cells and SPSA participates in a regulatory cycle in which Suc is simultaneously degraded and re-synthesized; both these functions contribute to plant growth in rhizobia nodulated alfalfa plants.
Authors: A T Chávez-Bárcenas; J J Valdez-Alarcón; M Martínez-Trujillo; L Chen; B Xoconostle-Cázares; W J Lucas; L Herrera-Estrella Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: C Kate Castleden; Naohiro Aoki; Vanessa J Gillespie; Elspeth A MacRae; W Paul Quick; Peter Buchner; Christine H Foyer; Robert T Furbank; John E Lunn Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2004-07-09 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Abdellatif Bahaji; Edurne Baroja-Fernández; Adriana Ricarte-Bermejo; Ángela María Sánchez-López; Francisco José Muñoz; Jose M Romero; María Teresa Ruiz; Marouane Baslam; Goizeder Almagro; María Teresa Sesma; Javier Pozueta-Romero Journal: Plant Sci Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 4.729
Authors: Lorenzo Aleman; Jose Luis Ortega; Martha Martinez-Grimes; Mark Seger; Francisco Omar Holguin; Diana J Uribe; David Garcia-Ibilcieta; Champa Sengupta-Gopalan Journal: Planta Date: 2009-11-08 Impact factor: 4.116
Authors: Saadia Bihmidine; Charles T Hunter; Christine E Johns; Karen E Koch; David M Braun Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Isaac A Salmeron-Santiago; Miguel Martínez-Trujillo; Juan J Valdez-Alarcón; Martha E Pedraza-Santos; Gustavo Santoyo; María J Pozo; Ana T Chávez-Bárcenas Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-12-30