Literature DB >> 2499391

The accident at Chernobyl and outcome of pregnancy in Finland.

T Harjulehto1, T Aro, H Rita, T Rytömaa, L Saxén.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of pregnancy in Finnish women after the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant on 26 April 1986.
DESIGN: Geographic and temporal cohort study.
SETTING: Finland divided into three zones according to amount of radioactive fallout.
SUBJECTS: All children who were exposed to radiation during their fetal development. Children born before any effects of the accident could be postulated--that is, between 1 January 1984 and 30 June 1986--served as controls.
INTERVENTIONS: Children were divided into three temporal groups: controls, children who were expected to be born in August to December 1986, and children who were expected to be born in February to December 1987. They were also divided, separately, into three groups according to the three geographic zones. END POINT: Incidence of congenital malformations, preterm births, and perinatal deaths.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of malformations or perinatal deaths among the three temporal and three geographic groups. A significant increase in preterm births occurred among children who were exposed to radiation during the first trimester whose mothers lived in zones 2 and 3, where the external dose rate and estimated surface activity of caesium-137 were highest.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the amount of radioactive fallout that Finnish people were exposed to after the accident at Chernobyl was not high enough to cause fetal damage in children born at term. The higher incidence of premature births among malformed children in the most heavily polluted areas, however, remains unexplained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2499391      PMCID: PMC1836339          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  Wet and dry deposition of Chernobyl releases.

Authors:  M J Clark; F B Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  [Radiation exposure and pregnancy].

Authors:  G Hinz; A Kaul
Journal:  Gynakologe       Date:  1987-09

3.  A matched-pair register for studies of selected congenital defects.

Authors:  L Saxén; A Klemetti; A S Härö
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  [Epidemiologic research--is it still possible for us today?].

Authors:  H K Selbmann
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1987-01-10

5.  Dose-response models and methods of risk prediction and causation estimation.

Authors:  F M Edwards
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  The victims of chernobyl in Greece: induced abortions after the accident.

Authors:  D Trichopoulos; X Zavitsanos; C Koutis; P Drogari; C Proukakis; E Petridou
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-10-31

7.  In utero exposure to A-bomb radiation and mental retardation; a reassessment.

Authors:  M Otake; W J Schull
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Radiation teratogenesis.

Authors:  R L Brent
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1980-06

9.  [Iodine 131: biokinetics, radiation exposure and risk assessment with reference to the reactor accident at Chernobyl].

Authors:  E Moser; H D Roedler
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1987-06

Review 10.  The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound.

Authors:  R L Brent
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.430

  10 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Clusters of birth defects: emergency and management. A review of some publications.

Authors:  J Goujard
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Pregnancy outcome of women in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiow-Ing Wang; Long-Teng Lee; Ming-Lun Zou; Chen-Wei Fan; Chin-Liang Yaung
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  An assessment of radiation doses at an educational institution 57.8 km away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant 1 month after the nuclear accident.

Authors:  Masayoshi Tsuji; Hideyuki Kanda; Takeyasu Kakamu; Daisuke Kobayashi; Masao Miyake; Takehito Hayakawa; Yayoi Mori; Toshiyasu Okochi; Akihiro Hazama; Tetsuhito Fukushima
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Birth prevalence of congenital malformations in Bavaria, Germany, after the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  C Irl; A Schoetzau; F van Santen; B Grosche
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  The accident at Chernobyl and outcome of pregnancy in Finland.

Authors:  M Joffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-05-20

6.  Dose information needed to assess effect of exposure to radiation in utero.

Authors:  H Dolk; P De Wals; M F Lechat
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-24

Review 7.  Occupational exposure and defects of the central nervous system in offspring: review.

Authors:  N Roeleveld; G A Zielhuis; F Gabreëls
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1990-09

8.  Nuclear radiation and prevalence of structural birth defects among infants born to women from the Marshall Islands.

Authors:  Wendy N Nembhard; Pearl A McElfish; Britni Ayers; R Thomas Collins; Xiaoyi Shan; Nader Z Rabie; Yuri A Zarate; Suman Maity; Ruiqi Cen; James A Robbins
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Chernobyl fallout and outcome of pregnancy in Finland.

Authors:  A Auvinen; M Vahteristo; H Arvela; M Suomela; T Rahola; M Hakama; T Rytömaa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Regression analysis of time trends in perinatal mortality in Germany 1980-1993.

Authors:  H Scherb; E Weigelt; I Brüske-Hohlfeld
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.