Literature DB >> 21818603

An assessment of radiation doses at an educational institution 57.8 km away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant 1 month after the nuclear accident.

Masayoshi Tsuji1, Hideyuki Kanda, Takeyasu Kakamu, Daisuke Kobayashi, Masao Miyake, Takehito Hayakawa, Yayoi Mori, Toshiyasu Okochi, Akihiro Hazama, Tetsuhito Fukushima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: On 11 March 2011, the Great East Japan Earthquake occurred. Due to this earthquake and subsequent tsunami, malfunctions occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Radioactive material even reached the investigated educational institution despite being 57.8 km away from the power station. With the goal of ensuring the safety of our students, we decided to carry out a risk assessment of the premises of this educational institution by measuring radiation doses at certain locations, making it possible to calculate estimated radiation accumulation.
METHODS: Systematic sampling was carried out at measurement points spaced at regular intervals for a total of 24 indoor and outdoor areas, with 137 measurements at heights of 1 cm and 100 cm above the ground surface. Radiation survey meters were used to measure environmental radiation doses.
RESULTS: Radiation dose rates and count rates were higher outdoors than indoors, and higher 1 cm above the ground surface than at 100 cm. Radiation doses 1 cm above the ground surface were higher on grass and moss than on asphalt and soil. The estimated radiation exposure for a student spending an average of 11 h on site at this educational institution was 9.80 μSv.
CONCLUSIONS: Environmental radiation doses at our educational institution 57.8 km away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant 1 month after the accident were lower than the national regulation dose for schools (3.8 μSv/h) at most points. Differences in radiation doses depending on outdoor surface properties are important to note for risk reduction.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21818603      PMCID: PMC3342635          DOI: 10.1007/s12199-011-0229-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med        ISSN: 1342-078X            Impact factor:   3.674


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of 137Cs fallout from the Chernobyl accident in a forest soil and its impact on Alpine Lake sediments, Mercantour Massif, S.E. France.

Authors:  S Rezzoug; H Michel; F Fernex; G Barci-Funel; V Barci
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 2.  [Working environment measurement of radioactive substances].

Authors:  Naoki Kunugita
Journal:  J UOEH       Date:  2007-12-01

3.  First assessment of Chernobyl radioactive plume over Paris.

Authors:  A J Thomas; J M Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jun 26-Jul 2       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  [Influence of nuclear reactor accident at Chernobyl' on the environmental radioactivity in Toyama].

Authors:  M Morita; M Shoji; T Honda; M Sakanoue
Journal:  Radioisotopes       Date:  1987-06

5.  Environmental radioactivity and dose evaluation in Taiwan after the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  C E Chung
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  The accident at Chernobyl and outcome of pregnancy in Finland.

Authors:  T Harjulehto; T Aro; H Rita; T Rytömaa; L Saxén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-15

7.  Thyroid cancer has increased in the adult populations of countries moderately affected by Chernobyl fallout.

Authors:  Stefan Mürbeth; Milena Rousarova; Hagen Scherb; Edmund Lengfelder
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2004-07

8.  137Cesium exposure and spirometry measures in Ukrainian children affected by the Chernobyl nuclear incident.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Igor E Kolpakov; Yevgenia I Stepanova; Vitaliy Y Vdovenko; Maryna V Naboka; Timothy A Mousseau; Lawrence C Mohr; David G Hoel; Wilfried J J Karmaus
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Influence of various factors on individual radiation exposure from the Chernobyl disaster.

Authors:  Pavlo Zamostian; Kirsten B Moysich; Martin C Mahoney; Philip McCarthy; Alexandra Bondar; Andrey G Noschenko; Arthur M Michalek
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Reducing radiation exposure using commonly available objects.

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Masao Miyake; Takeyasu Kakamu; Masayoshi Tsuji; Yayoi Mori; Tetsuhito Fukushima; Akihiro Hazama
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Radiation survey on Fukushima Medical University premises about four years after the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

Authors:  Yasutaka Omori; Hiroaki Wakamatsu; Atsuyuki Sorimachi; Tetsuo Ishikawa
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-25

3.  The Great East Japan Earthquake affected the laboratory findings of hemodialysis patients in Fukushima.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Junya Hata; Michihiro Yabe; Kei Ishibashi; Norio Takahashi; Ken Kumagai; Souichiro Ogawa; Masao Kataoka; Hidenori Akaihata; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Roles of children and their parents in the reduction of radiation risk after the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.

Authors:  Maya Sophia Fujimura; Yukako Komasa; Shinzo Kimura; Akira Shibanuma; Akiko Kitamura; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.