Vihas Patel1, Michelle Romano2, Mark R Corkins3, Rose Ann DiMaria-Ghalili4, Carrie Earthman5, Ainsley Malone6, Sarah Miller7, Kim Sabino8, Jennifer Wooley9, Peggi Guenter10. 1. Metabolic Support Service, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. 3. Le Bonheur Children's Hospital/University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 4. Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota. 6. Pharmacy Department, Mt Carmel West, Columbus, Ohio. 7. University of Montana Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Missoula, Montana. 8. St Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut. 9. University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 10. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Silver Spring, Maryland. peggig@nutritioncare.org.
Abstract
Background: The Joint Commission has mandated universal screening and assessment of hospitalized patients for malnutrition since 1995. Although various validated and nonvalidated tools are available, implementation of this mandate has not been well characterized. We report results of a survey of hospital-based professionals in the United States describing their perspective on the current range of nutrition screening and assessment practices as well as associated gaps in knowledge. Methods and Materials: Data from a 2012-2013 cross-sectional, web-based survey targeting members of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.), the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, and the Society of Hospital Medicine were collected with non-hospital-based members excluded. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: Survey data from 1777 unique email addresses are included in this report. A majority of respondents were dietitians, nearly half were A.S.P.E.N. members, and 69.4% reported caring for a mix of adult and pediatric patients. Most respondents answered affirmatively about nutrition screening being performed in alignment with The Joint Commission mandate, but only 50% were familiar with the 2012 Consensus Statement from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/A.S.P.E.N. on adult malnutrition. In most cases, nurses were primarily responsible for nutrition screening, while dietitians had primary responsibility for assessment. No one specific assessment tool or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code was identified as being used a majority of the time in assessing or coding a patient for malnutrition. Conclusions: The survey findings affirmed compliance with accreditation standards in completing a nutrition screen within 24 hours of admission, and most hospitals appear to have a process to perform a nutrition assessment once a screen is completed. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in both use of tools and mechanisms for coding capture. Opportunities exist to improve education around nutrition screening and assessment and to identify ideal practices for these processes in hospitalized patients.
Background: The Joint Commission has mandated universal screening and assessment of hospitalized patients for malnutrition since 1995. Although various validated and nonvalidated tools are available, implementation of this mandate has not been well characterized. We report results of a survey of hospital-based professionals in the United States describing their perspective on the current range of nutrition screening and assessment practices as well as associated gaps in knowledge. Methods and Materials: Data from a 2012-2013 cross-sectional, web-based survey targeting members of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.), the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, and the Society of Hospital Medicine were collected with non-hospital-based members excluded. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: Survey data from 1777 unique email addresses are included in this report. A majority of respondents were dietitians, nearly half were A.S.P.E.N. members, and 69.4% reported caring for a mix of adult and pediatric patients. Most respondents answered affirmatively about nutrition screening being performed in alignment with The Joint Commission mandate, but only 50% were familiar with the 2012 Consensus Statement from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/A.S.P.E.N. on adult malnutrition. In most cases, nurses were primarily responsible for nutrition screening, while dietitians had primary responsibility for assessment. No one specific assessment tool or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code was identified as being used a majority of the time in assessing or coding a patient for malnutrition. Conclusions: The survey findings affirmed compliance with accreditation standards in completing a nutrition screen within 24 hours of admission, and most hospitals appear to have a process to perform a nutrition assessment once a screen is completed. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in both use of tools and mechanisms for coding capture. Opportunities exist to improve education around nutrition screening and assessment and to identify ideal practices for these processes in hospitalized patients.
Authors: Erin F Barreto; Tejaswi Kanderi; Sara R DiCecco; Arnaldo Lopez-Ruiz; Janelle O Poyant; Kristin C Mara; Joy Heimgartner; Ognjen Gajic; Andrew D Rule; Erin M Nystrom; Kianoush B Kashani Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Cliona M Lorton; O Griffin; K Higgins; F Roulston; G Stewart; N Gough; E Barnes; A Aktas; T D Walsh Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Linda Van Horn; Carine M Lenders; Charlotte A Pratt; Bettina Beech; Patricia A Carney; William Dietz; Rose DiMaria-Ghalili; Timothy Harlan; Robert Hash; Martin Kohlmeier; Kathryn Kolasa; Nancy F Krebs; Robert F Kushner; Mary Lieh-Lai; Janet Lindsley; Susan Meacham; Holly Nicastro; Caryl Nowson; Carole Palmer; Miguel Paniagua; Edward Philips; Sumantra Ray; Suzanne Rose; Marcel Salive; Marsha Schofield; Kathryn Thompson; Jennifer L Trilk; Gwen Twillman; Jeffrey D White; Giovanna Zappalà; Ashley Vargas; Christopher Lynch Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Conrad M Tobert; Jill M Hamilton-Reeves; Lyse A Norian; Chermaine Hung; Nathan A Brooks; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Tracy M Downs; Douglas P Robertson; Ruth Grossman; Kenneth G Nepple Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Anthony D Oberle; Jeremy M West; Conrad M Tobert; Gabriel L Conley; Kenneth G Nepple Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Henry Namme Luma; Servais Albert Fiacre Bagnaka Eloumou; Franklin Ngu Mboligong; Elvis Temfack; Olivier-Tresor Donfack; Marie-Solange Doualla Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2017-07-03