Literature DB >> 24992729

Experimental validation of 3D printed patient-specific implants using digital image correlation and finite element analysis.

Alok Sutradhar1, Jaejong Park2, Diana Carrau3, Michael J Miller4.   

Abstract

With the dawn of 3D printing technology, patient-specific implant designs are set to have a paradigm shift. A topology optimization method in designing patient-specific craniofacial implants has been developed to ensure adequate load transfer mechanism and restore the form and function of the mid-face. Patient-specific finite element models are used to design these implants and to validate whether they are viable for physiological loading such as mastication. Validation of these topology optimized finite element models using mechanical testing is a critical step. Instead of inserting the implants into a cadaver or patient, we embed the implants into the computer-aided skull model of a patient and, fuse them together to 3D print the complete skull model with the implant. Masticatory forces are applied in the molar region to simulate chewing and measure the stress-strain trajectory. Until recently, strain gages have been used to measure strains for validation. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) method is a relatively new technique for full-field strain measurement which provides a continuous deformation field data. The main objective of this study is to validate the finite element model of patient-specific craniofacial implants against the strain data from the DIC obtained during the mastication simulation and show that the optimized shapes provide adequate load-transfer mechanism. Patient-specific models are obtained from CT scans. The principal maximum and minimum strains are compared. The computational and experimental approach to designing patient-specific implants proved to be a viable technique for mid-face craniofacial reconstruction.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniofacial implants; Digital image correlation; Masticatory simulation; Segmental bone defect; Topology optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24992729     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  11 in total

Review 1.  The advances of topology optimization techniques in orthopedic implants: A review.

Authors:  Naichao Wu; Shan Li; Boyan Zhang; Chenyu Wang; Bingpeng Chen; Qing Han; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi; Masoud Zhianmanesh; Osezua Ibhadode; Shahriar Imani Shahabad; Reza Esmaeilizadeh; Einollah Sarikhani; Sahar Toorandaz; Shima A Sarabi; Rohollah Nasiri; Yangzhi Zhu; Javad Kadkhodapour; Bingbing Li; Ali Khademhosseini; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-30

3.  3D-Printed Models versus CT Scan and X-Rays Imaging in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Triple-Blind Interobserver Reliability Comparison Study.

Authors:  Gianluca Puglisi; Marco Montemagno; Regina Denaro; Giuseppe Condorelli; Vincenzo Fabrizio Caruso; Andrea Vescio; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 4.  Regulatory Considerations in the Design and Manufacturing of Implantable 3D-Printed Medical Devices.

Authors:  Robert J Morrison; Khaled N Kashlan; Colleen L Flanangan; Jeanne K Wright; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister; Kevin J Weatherwax
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 5.  Surface modification of biomaterials and biomedical devices using additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Samuel Ford Robertson; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Designing patient-specific 3D printed craniofacial implants using a novel topology optimization method.

Authors:  Alok Sutradhar; Jaejong Park; Diana Carrau; Tam H Nguyen; Michael J Miller; Glaucio H Paulino
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Emerging Applications of Bedside 3D Printing in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren M Rozen; Paul G McMenamin; Michael W Findlay; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-06-16

8.  Anatomical Thin Titanium Mesh Plate Structural Optimization for Zygomatic-Maxillary Complex Fracture under Fatigue Testing.

Authors:  Yu-Tzu Wang; Shao-Fu Huang; Yu-Ting Fang; Shou-Chieh Huang; Hwei-Fang Cheng; Chih-Hao Chen; Po-Fang Wang; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The Pros and Cons of Computer-Aided Surgery for Segmental Mandibular Reconstruction after Oncological Surgery.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Hak Young Kim; Jun Yong Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-09-26

10.  3D printing of intracranial aneurysm based on intracranial digital subtraction angiography and its clinical application.

Authors:  Jian-Li Wang; Zi-Gang Yuan; Guo-Liang Qian; Wu-Qiao Bao; Guo-Liang Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.