A simple set of protocols for the controlled elaboration of anilines is reported allowing access to a diverse array of aminophenols, aminoarylsulfonates, alkylated anilines, and aminoanilines in 29-95% yield in a single laboratory operation from easily isolable, bench-stable N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides. The introduction of new C-O, C-C, and C-N bonds on the aromatic ring is made possible by a temporary increase in oxidation level and excision of a weak N-O bond.
A simple set of protocols for the controlled elaboration of anilines is reported allowing access to a diverse array of aminophenols, aminoarylsulfonates, alkylated anilines, and aminoanilines in 29-95% yield in a single laboratory operation from easily isolable, bench-stable N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides. The introduction of new C-O, C-C, and C-N bonds on the aromatic ring is made possible by a temporary increase in oxidation level and excision of a weak N-O bond.
Engaging anilines at nitrogen
and executing a group transfer from nitrogen to carbon is an attractive
method for the controlled functionalization of electron-rich aromatic
rings, which are otherwise more problematic to manipulate.[1] The aniline and aminophenol substructures are
embedded in many synthetic building blocks, ligands and other catalyst
frameworks, as well as a myriad of biologically active compounds.[2] Efficient access to these structures is of value
to chemists in many fields, yet methods that allow selective and controlled
elaboration of anilines remain rare.The all-carbonaza-Claisen
rearrangement of alkylated anilines
is an inefficient process and does not provide a synthetically useful
means of aromatic functionalization (Scheme 1, eq 1).[3] The introduction of weak, excisable N–O bonds into the operative bond
network affords the opportunity to exploit this important scaffold
for complexity generating reactions.[4] The
rearrangement of various acylated N-arylhydroxylamines
in this pursuit to give protected hydroxyanilines has a long history
dating to the mid-1950s, and various pericyclic, ion-pair, and radical-type
mechanisms have been examined (Scheme 1, eq
2).[4,5] A small number of carbon–carbon bond formations
utilizing these substrates have also been described over the same
time period, but substrate scope is generally limited to migrating
groups that can support an anion.[6] A recent
series of investigations greatly expanded the landscape of carbon–heteroatom
bond formations in N-arylhydroxylamine rearrangements,
allowing access to hydroxy- and aminoanilines, as well as cyclized
products.[7] These transformations are described
as concerted [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements and in most cases require
prolonged exposure to elevated temperature, microwave heating, or
other potentially deleterious reaction conditions. Most of these transformations
are efficient but require judicious choice of nitrogen-protective
groups and can also be sensitive to the electronic nature of the aromatic
ring.
Scheme 1
Aromatic Rearrangements Featuring N → C Group Transfer
We had need of several substituted anilines and sought
to overcome
some of the limitations of the N-arylhydroxylamine
rearrangements and provide a single platform on which one could execute
a variety of bond formations on anilines under mild reaction conditions
at low temperature (Scheme 1, eq 3). Herein,
we describe C–O, C–C, and C–N bond formations
under exceptionally mild reaction conditions that function by virtue
of an increase in oxidation level from aniline to aniline N-oxide. Aniline N-oxides are conveniently
generated from the corresponding anilines, easily isolated and handled,
and are generally bench stable.[8,9] Following an O-acylation event, group transfer from nitrogen to carbon
excises the weak N–O bond
and gives an iminium ion, and after loss of a proton, aromaticity
and electron density at nitrogen are restored. These bond formations
proceed in seconds to minutes at low temperature. The transformation
of N,N-dialkylaniline-N-oxides into oxygenated anilines was explored in the classical Boyland–Sims
oxidation,[10] with several mechanistic inquiries
described in the literature.[11]
Hydroxylation
of N,N-Dialkylaniline N-Oxides
Yields of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.Reaction conducted on a 10.0 mmol scale.The 2-bromo-6-hydroxy-N,N-dimethylaniline product was detectable
in the crude product mixture but inseparable from the 2-bromo-N-methylaniline side product.Milder,
more controlled transformations in this context were probed
briefly in the past, and in these early mechanistic studies, reaction
yields varied widely (6–90%) with side products attributed
to the multiple mechanistic pathways that are available (concerted
rearrangements, ion-pair, and radical pathways).[12] To our knowledge, there are only two prior examples of
carbon–carbon bond formations in this context, the reaction
of N,N-dimethylaniline-N-oxide with diketene and acetylene dicarboxylates.[13] In that work, spectroscopic data supported mechanisms in
which O-acylation/alkylation events are followed
by fragmentations into radical pairs, which recombined to give the
alkylated products. The alkylated products were accompanied by several
side products and thus other mechanistic possibilities could not be
excluded.[14]We describe efficient
access to a variety of aminophenols by sequential
treatment of N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides with trifluoroacetic anhydride and triethylamine
in dichloromethane at −78 °C (Scheme 2). The intermediate trifluoroacetate esters are hydrolyzed
on workup to give the phenols directly in 52–94% yield. These
conditions strongly favor ortho functionalization,
with the exception that substrates bearing a single ortho substituent modestly favor the 4-hydroxy-N,N-dialkylaniline product (e.g., Scheme 2, product 2b). We have not conclusively determined
the mechanism of the group transfer, and studies are ongoing. As in
the prior investigations, possibilities include concerted [3,3]-sigmatropic
rearrangements, ion-pair, and radical pathways. In any case, we were
not surprised to observe that substrates with no open ortho or para positions (i.e., 2,4,6-trimethyl-N,N-dimethylaniline) give no hydroxylated
product. Substrates bearing a meta substation give
mixtures of ortho hydroxylation products, favoring
the less sterically encumbered product (1.2–2:1). The reaction
functions well with both electron-donating and -withdrawing substitutents
with two notable exceptions, substrates bearing o-methyl or p-carbonyl substituents. In the case
of o-methyl substitution, the acylation event is
followed by nonspecific decomposition via what appears to be a deprotonation
that gives an aza-xylylene.[15] In the case
of p-carbonyl substitution, the acylation event is
followed by deprotonation of the N-methyl to give
an iminium ion that hydrolyzes on workup to result in the corresponding N-methylaniline product.[16]
Scheme 2
Hydroxylation
of N,N-Dialkylaniline N-Oxides
Yields of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.
Reaction conducted on a 10.0 mmol scale.
The 2-bromo-6-hydroxy-N,N-dimethylaniline product was detectable
in the crude product mixture but inseparable from the 2-bromo-N-methylaniline side product.
Trifluoromethanesulfonylation of N,N-Diallkylaniline N-Oxides
Yields
of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.Reaction was performed on a 10.0 mmol scale.Reaction was performed for 2 h
at −78 °C prior to addition of triethylamine.Product was isolated as a mixture
of regioisomers.Trifluoromethanesulfonic
anhydride (triflic anhydride, Tf2O) and p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (tosyl chloride)
also serve as viable acylation/oxygenation agents (Schemes 3 and 4).[7] Sequential treatment of N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides with triflic anhydride
or tosyl chloride and triethylamine in cold dichloromethane gives
a variety of aryl sulfonates in moderate to excellent yields. As above,
we observed the same regiochemical preferences for functionalization
and the same liabilities with respect to methyl and carbonyl substitution.
Additionally, the sulfonylated aniline N-oxides are
more vulnerable to the unproductive elimination reaction pathway that
gives rise to N-methylanilines. This reaction pathway
dominates in substrates bearing strong electron donors at the para position (e.g., N,N-dimethyl-p-anisidine), but strong electron donors
are tolerated at the meta position (e.g., N,N-dimethyl-m-anisidine
gives products 3h and 4b in 95% and 51%
yield, respectively).
Scheme 3
Trifluoromethanesulfonylation of N,N-Diallkylaniline N-Oxides
Yields
of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.
Reaction was performed on a 10.0 mmol scale.
Reaction was performed for 2 h
at −78 °C prior to addition of triethylamine.
Product was isolated as a mixture
of regioisomers.
Scheme 4
p-Toluenesulfonylation
of N,N-Diallkylaniline N-Oxides
Yields of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.
p-Toluenesulfonylation
of N,N-Diallkylaniline N-Oxides
Yields of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.
Alkylation of N,N-Dialkylaniline N-Oxides with Ethyl Malonyl Chloride
Yields
of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.Reaction was performed on a 10.0 mmol scale.Product was isolated as a mixture
of regioisomers.Importantly, the elevated
reactivity of N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides allows facile
carbon–carbon bond formation under exceptionally mild reaction
conditions: O-acylation events that give C–C
π-systems in their wake result in efficient and clean N → C group transfer, and following
rearrangement, a decarboxylation gives the final alkylated products.
Ethyl malonyl chloride,[17] a substrate that
will present a π-system by virtue of its existence predominantly
as an enol tautomer, functions successfully in this context (Scheme 5). We have noted the same regiochemical preferences
as in the above carbon–heteroatom bond formations and the same
liability with respect to demethylation to give N-methylanilines. Moreover, the carbon–carbon bond formation
event appears to be quite facile, occurring at low temperature in
a matter of minutes; the slowest event of the reaction sequence appears
to be the decarboxylation. The reaction functions well for both electron-donating
and -withdrawing substitutents, and C-alkylated products
are obtained cleanly in 29–67% yield.
Scheme 5
Alkylation of N,N-Dialkylaniline N-Oxides with Ethyl Malonyl Chloride
Yields
of isolated products;
reactions were performed on a 1.0 mmol scale.
Reaction was performed on a 10.0 mmol scale.
Product was isolated as a mixture
of regioisomers.
Methods for the
direct amination of anilines are exceptionally
rare.[7] We have successfully executed a
group transfer to give a new C–N bond using N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides and
phenyl isocyanate as a nitrogen source (Scheme 6), which to our knowledge is only the second example of the introduction
of a new C–N bond on an aromatic ring utilizing an aniline N-oxide.[13b,18] Studies to increase the efficiency
of this transformation are ongoing.
Scheme 6
Amination of N,N-Dimethylanline N-Oxide
(1a)
The elevated reactivity of N,N-dialkylaniline N-oxides facilitates clean,
efficient,
controlled, and scalable introduction of carbon–heteroatom
and carbon–carbon bonds onto the aromatic ring in the absence
of metals, Lewis acids, or other exotic reagents. Our future efforts
are directed toward unraveling the mechanistic details of these reactions,
expanding the scope of new bond forming reactions of aniline-N-oxides, and the application of these methods to natural
product synthesis. These studies will be reported in due course.
Authors: Naoyuki Shimada; Craig Stewart; William F Bow; Anais Jolit; Kahoano Wong; Zhe Zhou; Marcus A Tius Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 15.336