Andrew J Admon1, Christopher W Seymour2, Hayley B Gershengorn3, Hannah Wunsch4, Colin R Cooke5. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2. Department of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: cookecr@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Variation in the use of ICUs for low-risk conditions contributes to health system inefficiency. We sought to examine the relationship between ICU use for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) and cost, mortality, readmission, and procedure use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 61,249 adults with PE discharged from 263 hospitals in three states between 2007 and 2010. We generated hospital-specific ICU admission rate quartiles and used a series of multilevel models to evaluate relationships between admission rates and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality, readmission, and costs and between ICU admission rates and several critical care procedures. RESULTS: Hospital quartiles varied in unadjusted ICU admission rates for PE (range, ≤ 15% to > 31%). Among all patients, there was a small trend toward increased use of arterial catheterization (0.6%-1.1%, P < .01) in hospital quartiles with higher levels of ICU admission. However, use of invasive mechanical ventilation (14.4%-7.9%, P < .01), noninvasive ventilation (6.6%-3.0%, P < .01), central venous catheterization (14.6%-11.3%, P < .02), and thrombolytics (11.0%-4.7%, P < .01) in patients in the ICU declined across hospital quartiles. There was no relationship between ICU admission rate and risk-adjusted hospital mortality, costs, or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals vary widely in ICU admission rates for acute PE without a detectable impact on mortality, cost, or readmission. Patients admitted to ICUs in higher-using hospitals received many critical care procedures less often, suggesting that these patients may have had weaker indications for ICU admission. Hospitals with greater ICU admission may be appropriate targets for improving efficiency in ICU admissions.
BACKGROUND: Variation in the use of ICUs for low-risk conditions contributes to health system inefficiency. We sought to examine the relationship between ICU use for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) and cost, mortality, readmission, and procedure use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 61,249 adults with PE discharged from 263 hospitals in three states between 2007 and 2010. We generated hospital-specific ICU admission rate quartiles and used a series of multilevel models to evaluate relationships between admission rates and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality, readmission, and costs and between ICU admission rates and several critical care procedures. RESULTS: Hospital quartiles varied in unadjusted ICU admission rates for PE (range, ≤ 15% to > 31%). Among all patients, there was a small trend toward increased use of arterial catheterization (0.6%-1.1%, P < .01) in hospital quartiles with higher levels of ICU admission. However, use of invasive mechanical ventilation (14.4%-7.9%, P < .01), noninvasive ventilation (6.6%-3.0%, P < .01), central venous catheterization (14.6%-11.3%, P < .02), and thrombolytics (11.0%-4.7%, P < .01) in patients in the ICU declined across hospital quartiles. There was no relationship between ICU admission rate and risk-adjusted hospital mortality, costs, or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals vary widely in ICU admission rates for acute PE without a detectable impact on mortality, cost, or readmission. Patients admitted to ICUs in higher-using hospitals received many critical care procedures less often, suggesting that these patients may have had weaker indications for ICU admission. Hospitals with greater ICU admission may be appropriate targets for improving efficiency in ICU admissions.
Authors: Rachel Kohn; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mitchell M Levy; Peter A Ubel; Scott D Halpern Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Deborah A Taira; Todd B Seto; Richard Siegrist; Roberta Cosgrove; Ronna Berezin; David J Cohen Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Gary E Weissman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Lyle H Ungar; Michael O Harhay; Casey S Greene; Blanca E Himes; Scott D Halpern Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kusum S Mathews; Neha N Goel; Carmen Vargas-Torres; Ashley D Olson; Jing Zhou; Charles A Powell; Madhu Mazumdar; Gregory N Stock; Christopher M McDermott Journal: Lung Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Thomas S Valley; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Michael Heung; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Thomas S Valley; Michael W Sjoding; Andrew M Ryan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Sep 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Het Patel; Jenny A Shih; Ryan Gardner; Parth V Patel; Catherine Ross; Margaret M Hayes; Ari Moskowitz; Michael W Donnino Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Michael W Sjoding; Hallie C Prescott; Hannah Wunsch; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Elinore J Kaufman; Douglas J Wiebe; Niels D Martin; Jose L Pascual; Patrick M Reilly; Daniel N Holena Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.192