Literature DB >> 24991348

The economic burden of fragile x syndrome: healthcare resource utilization in the United States.

Patricia Sacco1, Gorana Capkun-Niggli2, Xin Zhang3, Rosemary Jose4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability with cognitive and behavioral impairments, and is associated with a lifetime of care-taking challenges. There is a paucity of data on the economic burden of FXS.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the direct costs associated with healthcare and medication utilization for patients with FXS by using commercial and Medicare/Medicaid administrative claims data.
METHODS: All-cause direct healthcare and prescription drug utilization were analyzed from the Thomson Reuters Healthcare MarketScan Commercial, the Medicare Supplemental, and the MarketScan Medicaid databases between 2004 and 2009. Inclusion criteria were ≥1 diagnosis of FXS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, 759.83) and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment in the current health plan. Emergency department, hospitalization, outpatient visit, nonspecified procedures, and prescription drug data were analyzed for a 12-month follow-up period. Because the number of Medicare patients was <50, commercial and Medicare databases were combined into a single cohort. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results.
RESULTS: A total of 1505 patients were included in the study; of these, 784 patients had commercial/Medicare insurance and 721 patients had Medicaid. The mean age was 18 years. In all age-groups, the median all-cause healthcare cost per patient was significantly lower in the commercial/Medicare cohort (range, $2222-$2955) than in the Medicaid cohort (range, $4548-$9702). The annual median costs per patient for those who had any medical procedures were $1614 and $3064 for commercial or Medicare and for Medicaid, respectively. The annual median costs per patient for those with at least 1 hospitalization was $7740 in the commercial/Medicare cohort (9.4% of patients) and $4468 in the Medicaid cohort (12.5% of patients).
CONCLUSION: This first descriptive US claims analysis supports the overall results from surveys on the economic burden related to FXS. The cost drivers in this population included medical procedures, hospitalizations in a subset of patients, and medications to a lesser extent. This information may be relevant to payers for benefit design and allocation of resources. A more targeted assessment of resource utilization is needed to estimate the value of interventions that reduce costs and improve the outcomes of patients with FXS.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24991348      PMCID: PMC4031705     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits        ISSN: 1942-2962


  24 in total

Review 1.  Screening for fragile X syndrome: a literature review and modelling study.

Authors:  F J Song; P Barton; V Sleightholme; G L Yao; A Fry-Smith
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Biosimilars and market access: a question of comparability and costs?

Authors:  Steven Simoens; Gilbert Verbeken; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Using a parent survey to advance knowledge about the nature and consequences of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa; Murrey G Olmsted
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2010-11

4.  Fragile X syndrome: a psychiatric perspective.

Authors:  Michael R Tranfaglia
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

5.  Medication utilization for targeted symptoms in children and adults with fragile X syndrome: US survey.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa; Ellen Bishop; Murrey Olmsted; Usha G Mallya; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.225

6.  The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?

Authors:  Olivier Wellman-Labadie; Youwen Zhou
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Predisposition to the fragile X syndrome in Jews of Tunisian descent is due to the absence of AGG interruptions on a rare Mediterranean haplotype.

Authors:  T C Falik-Zaccai; E Shachak; M Yalon; Z Lis; Z Borochowitz; J N Macpherson; D L Nelson; E E Eichler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Jessica A Myers; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Co-occurring conditions associated with FMR1 gene variations: findings from a national parent survey.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa; Murrey Olmsted; David B Holiday
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Health and economic consequences of fragile X syndrome for caregivers.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Melissa Raspa; Ellen Bishop; Debanjali Mitra; Susan Martin; Anne Wheeler; Pat Sacco
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  Use of state administrative data sources to study adolescents and young adults with rare conditions.

Authors:  J A Royer; J W Hardin; S McDermott; L Ouyang; J R Mann; O D Ozturk; J Bolen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Fragile X Syndrome-Associated Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2006-2011.

Authors:  Thuy Quynh N Do; Catharine Riley; Pangaja Paramsothy; Lijing Ouyang; Julie Bolen; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2020-03

3.  Demographics and medical comorbidities among hospitalized patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome: A National Inpatient Sample analysis.

Authors:  James Luccarelli
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.578

4.  30-day all-cause readmission rates among a cohort of individuals with rare conditions.

Authors:  Kevin J Bennett; Joshua R Mann; Lijing Ouyang
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.554

Review 5.  Prioritising the application of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Brett Doble; Deborah J Schofield; Tony Roscioli; John S Mattick
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 8.617

6.  Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a 176-condition expanded carrier screen.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Katherine A Johansen Taber; Dale Muzzey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  High Throughput Small Molecule Screen for Reactivation of FMR1 in Fragile X Syndrome Human Neural Cells.

Authors:  Jack F V Hunt; Meng Li; Ryan Risgaard; Gene E Ananiev; Scott Wildman; Fan Zhang; Tim S Bugni; Xinyu Zhao; Anita Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 7.666

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.