Literature DB >> 20036435

The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?

Olivier Wellman-Labadie1, Youwen Zhou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates issues associated with the United States Orphan Drug Act.
METHODS: A comprehensive orphan drug database was compiled from FDA data and corporate annual reports of major pharmaceutical companies. Analysis allowed the generation of a descriptive orphan drug portrait as well as documentation of orphan drugs along their lifecycle.
RESULTS: Currently, 2002 products have obtained orphan drug designation with 352 drugs obtaining FDA approval. Approximately 33% of orphan drugs are oncology products. On average, products obtain 1.7 orphan designations with approximately 70% obtaining a single designation. At least 9% of orphan drugs have reached blockbuster status with two-thirds having two or more designations. An additional 25 orphan drugs had sales exceeding US$ 100 million in 2008 alone. Since 1983, at least 14 previously discontinued products have been recycled as orphan drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: The United States Orphan Drug Act has created issues which, in some cases, have led to commercial and ethical abuses. Orphan Drug Act reform is necessary but current incentives, including 7 year market exclusivity, should be maintained in order to favour patients as well as economic prosperity. Suggested reforms include price regulation, subsidy paybacks for profitable drugs and the establishment of an International Orphan Drug Office. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20036435     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  35 in total

Review 1.  Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions.

Authors:  Erik Tambuyzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status?

Authors:  Steven Simoens; David Cassiman; Marc Dooms; Eline Picavet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  An empirical review of major legislation affecting drug development: past experiences, effects, and unintended consequences.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Attention to Individuals: Mixed Methods for N-of-1 Health Care Interventions.

Authors:  Peter H Van Ness; Terrence E Murphy; Ather Ali
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 5.  Rare diseases, orphan drugs, and their regulation in Asia: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Peipei Song; Jianjun Gao; Yoshinori Inagaki; Norihiro Kokudo; Wei Tang
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2012-02

6.  Intractable and rare diseases research.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2012-02

7.  Ebola crisis of 2014: are current strategies enough to meet the long-run challenges ahead?

Authors:  Gilbert Gimm; Len M Nichols
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Orphan drug policies and use in pediatric nephrology.

Authors:  Diana Karpman; Peter Höglund
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  Drug development for rare mitochondrial disorders.

Authors:  Orest Hurko
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  The economic burden of fragile x syndrome: healthcare resource utilization in the United States.

Authors:  Patricia Sacco; Gorana Capkun-Niggli; Xin Zhang; Rosemary Jose
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.