Literature DB >> 24990671

How much gene flow is needed to avoid inbreeding depression in wild tiger populations?

John Kenney1, Fred W Allendorf2, Charles McDougal3, James L D Smith4.   

Abstract

The number and size of tiger populations continue to decline owing to habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and poaching of tigers and their prey. As a result, tiger populations have become small and highly structured. Current populations have been isolated since the early 1970s or for approximately seven generations. The objective of this study is to explore how inbreeding may be affecting the persistence of remaining tiger populations and how dispersal, either natural or artificial, may reduce the potentially detrimental effect of inbreeding depression. We developed a tiger simulation model and used published levels of genetic load in mammals to simulate inbreeding depression. Following a 50 year period of population isolation, we introduced one to four dispersing male tigers per generation to explore how gene flow from nearby populations may reduce the negative impact of inbreeding depression. For the smallest populations, even four dispersing male tigers per generation did not increase population viability, and the likelihood of extinction is more than 90% within 30 years. Unless habitat connectivity is restored or animals are artificially introduced in the next 70 years, medium size wild populations are also likely to go extinct, with only four to five of the largest wild tiger populations likely to remain extant in this same period without intervention. To reduce the risk of local extinction, habitat connectivity must be pursued concurrently with efforts to increase population size (e.g. enhance habitat quality, increase habitat availability). It is critical that infrastructure development, dam construction and other similar projects are planned appropriately so that they do not erode the extent or quality of habitat for these populations so that they can truly serve as future source populations.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conservation; extinction probability; gene flow; inbreeding depression; risk analysis; tigers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990671      PMCID: PMC4100497          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them.

Authors:  Derek Spielman; Barry W Brook; Richard Frankham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inbreeding in the wild really does matter.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Gene flow and genetic differentiation.

Authors:  P T Spieth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles W Fox; David H Reed
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Bringing the tiger back from the brink-the six percent solution.

Authors:  Joe Walston; John G Robinson; Elizabeth L Bennett; Urs Breitenmoser; Gustavo A B da Fonseca; John Goodrich; Melvin Gumal; Luke Hunter; Arlyne Johnson; K Ullas Karanth; Nigel Leader-Williams; Kathy Mackinnon; Dale Miquelle; Anak Pattanavibool; Colin Poole; Alan Rabinowitz; James L D Smith; Emma J Stokes; Simon N Stuart; Chanthavy Vongkhamheng; Hariyo Wibisono
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Demographic loss, genetic structure and the conservation implications for Indian tigers.

Authors:  Samrat Mondol; Michael W Bruford; Uma Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Inbreeding depression in red deer calves.

Authors:  Craig A Walling; Daniel H Nussey; Alison Morris; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Loeske E B Kruuk; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Spatial genetic analysis reveals high connectivity of tiger (Panthera tigris) populations in the Satpura-Maikal landscape of Central India.

Authors:  Sandeep Sharma; Trishna Dutta; Jesús E Maldonado; Thomas C Wood; Hemendra Singh Panwar; John Seidensticker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  16 in total

1.  Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.

Authors:  M Kardos; G Luikart; F W Allendorf
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Forecasting effects of transport infrastructure on endangered tigers: a tool for conservation planning.

Authors:  Neil H Carter; Narendra Pradhan; Krishna Hengaju; Chinmay Sonawane; Abigail H Sage; Volker Grimm
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Genetic rescue in a severely inbred wolf population.

Authors:  Mikael Åkesson; Olof Liberg; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Staffan Bensch; Øystein Flagstad
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  No evidence of inbreeding depression in sperm performance traits in wild song sparrows.

Authors:  Sylvain Losdat; Ryan R Germain; Pirmin Nietlisbach; Peter Arcese; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Assessment of genetic diversity, population structure, and gene flow of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) across Nepal's Terai Arc Landscape.

Authors:  Kanchan Thapa; Sulochana Manandhar; Manisha Bista; Jivan Shakya; Govind Sah; Maheshwar Dhakal; Netra Sharma; Bronwyn Llewellyn; Claudia Wultsch; Lisette P Waits; Marcella J Kelly; Jean-Marc Hero; Jane Hughes; Dibesh Karmacharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A single migrant enhances the genetic diversity of an inbred puma population.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; T Winston Vickers; Walter M Boyce; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Tigers in the Terai: Strong evidence for meta-population dynamics contributing to tiger recovery and conservation in the Terai Arc Landscape.

Authors:  Kanchan Thapa; Eric Wikramanayake; Sabita Malla; Krishna Prasad Acharya; Babu Ram Lamichhane; Naresh Subedi; Chiranjivi Prasad Pokharel; Gokarna Jung Thapa; Maheshwar Dhakal; Ashish Bista; Jimmy Borah; Mudit Gupta; Kamlesh K Maurya; Ghana Shyam Gurung; Shant Raj Jnawali; Narendra Man Babu Pradhan; Shiv Raj Bhata; Saroj Koirala; Dipankar Ghose; Joseph Vattakaven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Wild versus domestic prey in the diet of reintroduced tigers (Panthera tigris) in the livestock-dominated multiple-use forests of Panna Tiger Reserve, India.

Authors:  S S Kolipaka; W L M Tamis; M van 't Zelfde; G A Persoon; H H de Iongh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sumatran tiger survival threatened by deforestation despite increasing densities in parks.

Authors:  Matthew Scott Luskin; Wido Rizki Albert; Mathias W Tobler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Impact of prey occupancy and other ecological and anthropogenic factors on tiger distribution in Thailand's western forest complex.

Authors:  Somphot Duangchantrasiri; Pornkamol Jornburom; Sitthichai Jinamoy; Anak Pattanavibool; James E Hines; Todd W Arnold; John Fieberg; James L D Smith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.