Literature DB >> 24990223

Influence of physiological phenology on the seasonal pattern of ecosystem respiration in deciduous forests.

Mirco Migliavacca1, Markus Reichstein, Andrew D Richardson, Miguel D Mahecha, Edoardo Cremonese, Nicolas Delpierre, Marta Galvagno, Beverly E Law, Georg Wohlfahrt, T Andrew Black, Nuno Carvalhais, Guido Ceccherini, Jiquan Chen, Nadine Gobron, Ernest Koffi, J William Munger, Oscar Perez-Priego, Monica Robustelli, Enrico Tomelleri, Alessandro Cescatti.   

Abstract

Understanding the environmental and biotic drivers of respiration at the ecosystem level is a prerequisite to further improve scenarios of the global carbon cycle. In this study we investigated the relevance of physiological phenology, defined as seasonal changes in plant physiological properties, for explaining the temporal dynamics of ecosystem respiration (RECO) in deciduous forests. Previous studies showed that empirical RECO models can be substantially improved by considering the biotic dependency of RECO on the short-term productivity (e.g., daily gross primary production, GPP) in addition to the well-known environmental controls of temperature and water availability. Here, we use a model-data integration approach to investigate the added value of physiological phenology, represented by the first temporal derivative of GPP, or alternatively of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, for modeling RECO at 19 deciduous broadleaved forests in the FLUXNET La Thuile database. The new data-oriented semiempirical model leads to an 8% decrease in root mean square error (RMSE) and a 6% increase in the modeling efficiency (EF) of modeled RECO when compared to a version of the model that does not consider the physiological phenology. The reduction of the model-observation bias occurred mainly at the monthly time scale, and in spring and summer, while a smaller reduction was observed at the annual time scale. The proposed approach did not improve the model performance at several sites, and we identified as potential causes the plant canopy heterogeneity and the use of air temperature as a driver of ecosystem respiration instead of soil temperature. However, in the majority of sites the model-error remained unchanged regardless of the driving temperature. Overall, our results point toward the potential for improving current approaches for modeling RECO in deciduous forests by including the phenological cycle of the canopy.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FLUXNET La Thuile database; deciduous forests; ecosystem respiration; eddy covariance; land-atmosphere fluxes; phenology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990223     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating of simulated carbon flux phenology over a cropland ecosystem in a semiarid area of China with SiBcrop.

Authors:  Qun Du; Huizhi Liu; Lujun Xu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Modeling net ecosystem carbon exchange of alpine grasslands with a satellite-driven model.

Authors:  Wei Yan; Zhongmin Hu; Yuping Zhao; Xianzhou Zhang; Yuzhi Fan; Peili Shi; Yongtao He; Guirui Yu; Yingnian Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Does the different photosynthetic pathway of plants affect soil respiration in a subtropical wetland?

Authors:  Jingrui Chen; Qiulin Wang; Ming Li; Fan Liu; Wei Li
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration.

Authors:  Trevor F Keenan; Mirco Migliavacca; Dario Papale; Dennis Baldocchi; Markus Reichstein; Margaret Torn; Thomas Wutzler
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 5.  Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Variability.

Authors:  Dennis Baldocchi; Youngryel Ryu; Trevor Keenan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26

6.  COSORE: A community database for continuous soil respiration and other soil-atmosphere greenhouse gas flux data.

Authors:  Ben Bond-Lamberty; Danielle S Christianson; Avni Malhotra; Stephanie C Pennington; Debjani Sihi; Amir AghaKouchak; Hassan Anjileli; M Altaf Arain; Juan J Armesto; Samaneh Ashraf; Mioko Ataka; Dennis Baldocchi; Thomas Andrew Black; Nina Buchmann; Mariah S Carbone; Shih-Chieh Chang; Patrick Crill; Peter S Curtis; Eric A Davidson; Ankur R Desai; John E Drake; Tarek S El-Madany; Michael Gavazzi; Carolyn-Monika Görres; Christopher M Gough; Michael Goulden; Jillian Gregg; Omar Gutiérrez Del Arroyo; Jin-Sheng He; Takashi Hirano; Anya Hopple; Holly Hughes; Järvi Järveoja; Rachhpal Jassal; Jinshi Jian; Haiming Kan; Jason Kaye; Yuji Kominami; Naishen Liang; David Lipson; Catriona A Macdonald; Kadmiel Maseyk; Kayla Mathes; Marguerite Mauritz; Melanie A Mayes; Steve McNulty; Guofang Miao; Mirco Migliavacca; Scott Miller; Chelcy F Miniat; Jennifer G Nietz; Mats B Nilsson; Asko Noormets; Hamidreza Norouzi; Christine S O'Connell; Bruce Osborne; Cecilio Oyonarte; Zhuo Pang; Matthias Peichl; Elise Pendall; Jorge F Perez-Quezada; Claire L Phillips; Richard P Phillips; James W Raich; Alexandre A Renchon; Nadine K Ruehr; Enrique P Sánchez-Cañete; Matthew Saunders; Kathleen E Savage; Marion Schrumpf; Russell L Scott; Ulli Seibt; Whendee L Silver; Wu Sun; Daphne Szutu; Kentaro Takagi; Masahiro Takagi; Munemasa Teramoto; Mark G Tjoelker; Susan Trumbore; Masahito Ueyama; Rodrigo Vargas; Ruth K Varner; Joseph Verfaillie; Christoph Vogel; Jinsong Wang; Greg Winston; Tana E Wood; Juying Wu; Thomas Wutzler; Jiye Zeng; Tianshan Zha; Quan Zhang; Junliang Zou
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 10.863

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.