Betty S Black1, Holly Taylor2, Peter V Rabins1, Jason Karlawish3. 1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics,Johns Hopkins Hospital,600 North Wolfe Street,Meyer 3-142,Baltimore,Maryland 21287,USA. 2. Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics,1809 Ashland Avenue,Baltimore,Maryland 21205,USA. 3. Perelman School of Medicine,University of Pennsylvania,3615 Chestnut Street,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania 19104,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Study partners for dementia research participants are vital to the research process, but little is known about their role, responsibilities, and experiences. Study partners are usually family members or friends - often the patient's informal caregiver - who are knowledgeable about and usually accompany the participant to study visits. This study examines researchers' perspectives on the role of study partners in dementia research. METHODS: Qualitative data collection and analytic methods were used. Semi-structured individual interviews with principal investigators, study coordinators, and research nurses (i.e. researchers; n = 17) at two academic research sites were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed to identify themes in the data. RESULTS: According to researchers, study partners either make or help make research enrollment and post-enrollment decisions, serve as knowledgeable informants for the participants, manage the logistics that enable participants to comply with a study's protocol, and provide comfort and encouragement for the patient to engage in and complete a study. Researchers describe ideal qualities of study partners as being able to provide reliable information, being dependable and adherent to the protocol, and not expecting a benefit. They also report that study partners may face both practical and emotional challenges during research participation. However, researchers believe that study partners derive dementia-related education, caregiver support, and satisfaction from their involvement in research. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators, potential study partners, and institutional review boards should be aware of study partners' research responsibilities, challenges, and their interests as caregivers.
BACKGROUND: Study partners for dementia research participants are vital to the research process, but little is known about their role, responsibilities, and experiences. Study partners are usually family members or friends - often the patient's informal caregiver - who are knowledgeable about and usually accompany the participant to study visits. This study examines researchers' perspectives on the role of study partners in dementia research. METHODS: Qualitative data collection and analytic methods were used. Semi-structured individual interviews with principal investigators, study coordinators, and research nurses (i.e. researchers; n = 17) at two academic research sites were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed to identify themes in the data. RESULTS: According to researchers, study partners either make or help make research enrollment and post-enrollment decisions, serve as knowledgeable informants for the participants, manage the logistics that enable participants to comply with a study's protocol, and provide comfort and encouragement for the patient to engage in and complete a study. Researchers describe ideal qualities of study partners as being able to provide reliable information, being dependable and adherent to the protocol, and not expecting a benefit. They also report that study partners may face both practical and emotional challenges during research participation. However, researchers believe that study partners derive dementia-related education, caregiver support, and satisfaction from their involvement in research. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators, potential study partners, and institutional review boards should be aware of study partners' research responsibilities, challenges, and their interests as caregivers.
Authors: Alan S Bellack; Michael F Green; Judith A Cook; Wayne Fenton; Philip D Harvey; Robert K Heaton; Thomas Laughren; Andrew C Leon; Donna J Mayo; Donald L Patrick; Thomas L Patterson; Andrew Rose; Ellen Stover; Til Wykes Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Lon S Schneider; Christopher M Clark; Rachelle Doody; Steven H Ferris; John C Morris; Rema Raman; Barry Reisberg; Frederick A Schmitt Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2006 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Katrin M Seeher; Lee-Fay Low; Simone Reppermund; Melissa J Slavin; Brian M Draper; Kristan Kang; Nicole A Kochan; Julian N Trollor; Perminder S Sachdev; Henry Brodaty Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Becky Field; Gail Mountain; Jane Burgess; Laura Di Bona; Daniel Kelleher; Jacqueline Mundy; Jennifer Wenborn Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anthony L Vaccarino; Derek Beaton; Sandra E Black; Pierre Blier; Farnak Farzan; Elizabeth Finger; Jane A Foster; Morris Freedman; Benicio N Frey; Susan Gilbert Evans; Keith Ho; Mojib Javadi; Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam; Anthony E Lang; Bianca Lasalandra; Sara Latour; Mario Masellis; Roumen V Milev; Daniel J Müller; Douglas P Munoz; Sagar V Parikh; Franca Placenza; Susan Rotzinger; Claudio N Soares; Alana Sparks; Stephen C Strother; Richard H Swartz; Brian Tan; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Valerie H Taylor; Elizabeth Theriault; Gustavo Turecki; Rudolf Uher; Lorne Zinman; Kenneth R Evans Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 4.157