Literature DB >> 24989819

Answer to the Letter to the Editor concerning "Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion" by Da-Geng Huang, et al. Eur Spine J (2014) 23(5):1109-1114.

Da-Geng Huang1, Ding-Jun Hao.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24989819     DOI： 10.1007/s00586-014-3439-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN： 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Anatomic determination of optimal entry point and direction for C1 lateral mass screw placement.

Authors:  Stuart E Blagg; Angus S Don; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-06

2.  C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis.

Authors:  James M Lin; John A Hipp; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Morphology of the atlas pedicle revisited: a morphometric CT-based study on 120 patients.

Authors:  Li-Xiong Qian; Ding-Jun Hao; Bao-Rong He; Yong-Hong Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?

Authors:  Da-Geng Huang; Si-Min He; Jun-Wei Pan; Hua Hui; Hui-Min Hu; Bao-Rong He; Hui Li; Xue-Fang Zhang; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.