Literature DB >> 24509775

Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?

Da-Geng Huang1, Si-Min He, Jun-Wei Pan, Hua Hui, Hui-Min Hu, Bao-Rong He, Hui Li, Xue-Fang Zhang, Ding-Jun Hao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of C1 pedicle screw fixation in patients whose atlas vertebral artery groove (defined as the C1 pedicle) height is less than 4 mm, but with a medullary canal.
METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2013, 7 patients (6 males, 1 female) with atlantoaxial instability whose C1 pedicle height was less than 4.0 mm on one or both sides were treated by C1 pedicle screw fixation at our institution. Thirteen of the 14 C1 pedicles were less than 4.0 mm in height, but all had a medullary canal. Patients were followed up at regular intervals. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to assess if C1 pedicle screw placement was successful. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to postoperative complications, the American Spinal Injury Association grading system, and bone graft status.
RESULTS: Thirteen C1 pedicles with a height less than 4.0 mm were inserted by 13 3.5- or 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screws, and one C1 pedicle whose height was 4.1 mm was inserted by a 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screw. In addition, 14 pedicle screws were inserted in the axis. The mean follow-up period was 23 (range 8-38) months. No neurologic or vascular complications occurred in any of the seven patients. Postoperative CT three-dimensional reconstruction images showed that all 14 pedicle screws were inserted in the C1 pedicles without destruction of the atlas pedicle cortical bone. All patients demonstrated bony fusion 6 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: If there is a medullary canal in the C1 pedicle, a 3.5- or 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screw can be safely inserted into the atlas and C1 pedicle screw fixation can be performed without any impact on fixation stability and clinical efficacy, even if the C1 pedicle height is less than 4.0 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509775     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3217-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  The feasibility of inserting atlas lateral mass screws via the posterior arch.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Ezequiel Cassinelli; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement.

Authors:  David M Christensen; Robert K Eastlack; James J Lynch; Michael J Yaszemski; Bradford L Currier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Anatomic determination of optimal entry point and direction for C1 lateral mass screw placement.

Authors:  Stuart E Blagg; Angus S Don; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-06

4.  Evaluation of anatomic landmarks and safe zones for screw placement in the atlas via the posterior arch.

Authors:  Matthias Gebauer; Florian Barvencik; Daniel Briem; Jan P Kolb; Sebastian Seitz; Johannes M Rueger; Klaus Püschel; Michael Amling
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Feasibility of laminar screw placement in the upper thoracic spine: analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomographic simulation.

Authors:  Mary Ruth Alfonso Padua; Jin S Yeom; Huynh Thong Em; Ho-Joong Kim; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct: case report and technical note.

Authors:  Daniel K Resnick; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  CT analysis of pedicles and screw tracts after implant removal in thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  L Sjöström; O Jacobsson; G Karlström; P Pech; W Rauschning
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1993-06

8.  Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation.

Authors:  A Goel; V Laheri
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 9.  Impact of Starting Point and Bicortical Purchase of C1 Lateral Mass Screws on Atlantoaxial Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Robert E Elliott; Omar Tanweer; Michael L Smith; Anthony Frempong-Boadu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-08

10.  Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2-6.

Authors:  Matthew J Geck; Eeric Truumees; Dana Hawthorne; Devender Singh; John K Stokes; Amy Flynn
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2014-05
View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of perpendicular to the coronal plane versus medial inclination for atlas pedicle screw insertion: an anatomic and radiological study in human cadavers.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Jian Tang; Deguang Wang; Yucheng Zhu; Tao Sui; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Atlas posterior arch and vertebral artery's groove variants: a classification, morphometric study, clinical and surgical implications.

Authors:  Konstantinos Natsis; Evangelia-Theophano Piperaki; Moschos Fratzoglou; Nikolaos Lazaridis; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Αlexandros Samolis; Michael Kostares; Maria Piagkou
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The feasibility of inserting a C1 pedicle screw in patients with ponticulus posticus: a retrospective analysis of eleven patients.

Authors:  Xin-Liang Zhang; Da-Geng Huang; Xiao-Dong Wang; Jin-Wen Zhu; Yi-Bing Li; Bao-Rong He; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Placement of C1 Pedicle Screws Using Minimal Exposure: Radiographic, Clinical, and Literature Validation.

Authors:  Richard P Menger; Christopher M Storey; Menarvia K C Nixon; Justin Haydel; Anil Nanda; Anthony Sin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

5.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?" (by Da-Geng Huang, Si-Min He, Jun-Wei Pan, et al. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(5):1109-1114).

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Luca P Ardigò
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor concerning "Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion" by Da-Geng Huang, et al. Eur Spine J (2014) 23(5):1109-1114.

Authors:  Da-Geng Huang; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Anatomical feasibility for safe occipital condyle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ho Jin Lee; Doo Yong Choi; Myoung Hoon Shin; Jong Tae Kim; Il Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Need for scientific rigor in the evaluation of minimally invasive alternative procedures.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Gallie technique versus atlantoaxial screw-rod constructs in the treatment of atlantoaxial sagittal instability: a retrospective study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Bo Yuan; Shengyuan Zhou; Xiongsheng Chen; Zhiwei Wang; Weicong Liu; Lianshun Jia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Endoscopic transnasal anterior release and posterior reduction without odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Authors:  Xiangsheng Tang; Xinjie Wu; Mingsheng Tan; Ping Yi; Feng Yang; Qingying Hao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.