Literature DB >> 24989405

Correlation between energy deposition and molecular damage from Auger electrons: A case study of ultra-low energy (5-18 eV) electron interactions with DNA.

Mohammad Rezaee1, Darel J Hunting1, Léon Sanche1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study introduces a new method to establish a direct correlation between biologically related physical parameters (i.e., stopping and damaging cross sections, respectively) for an Auger-electron emitting radionuclide decaying within a target molecule (e.g., DNA), so as to evaluate the efficacy of the radionuclide at the molecular level. These parameters can be applied to the dosimetry of Auger electrons and the quantification of their biological effects, which are the main criteria to assess the therapeutic efficacy of Auger-electron emitting radionuclides.
METHODS: Absorbed dose and stopping cross section for the Auger electrons of 5-18 eV emitted by(125)I within DNA were determined by developing a nanodosimetric model. The molecular damages induced by these Auger electrons were investigated by measuring damaging cross section, including that for the formation of DNA single- and double-strand breaks. Nanoscale films of pure plasmid DNA were prepared via the freeze-drying technique and subsequently irradiated with low-energy electrons at various fluences. The damaging cross sections were determined by employing a molecular survival model to the measured exposure-response curves for induction of DNA strand breaks.
RESULTS: For a single decay of(125)I within DNA, the Auger electrons of 5-18 eV deposit the energies of 12.1 and 9.1 eV within a 4.2-nm(3) volume of a hydrated or dry DNA, which results in the absorbed doses of 270 and 210 kGy, respectively. DNA bases have a major contribution to the deposited energies. Ten-electronvolt and high linear energy transfer 100-eV electrons have a similar cross section for the formation of DNA double-strand break, while 100-eV electrons are twice as efficient as 10 eV in the induction of single-strand break.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-low-energy electrons (<18 eV) substantially contribute to the absorbed dose and to the molecular damage from Auger-electron emitting radionuclides; hence, they should be considered in the dosimetry calculation of such radionuclides. Moreover, absorbed dose is not an appropriate physical parameter for nanodosimetry. Instead, stopping cross section, which describes the probability of energy deposition in a target molecule can be an appropriate nanodosimetric parameter. The stopping cross section is correlated with a damaging cross section (e.g., cross section for the double-strand break formation) to quantify the number of each specific lesion in a target molecule for each nuclear decay of a single Auger-electron emitting radionuclide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989405      PMCID: PMC4623756          DOI: 10.1118/1.4881329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  48 in total

1.  Effect of distance between decaying (125)I and DNA on Auger-electron induced double-strand break yield.

Authors:  Pichumani Balagurumoorthy; Xiang Xu; Ketai Wang; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Cross sections of electron inelastic interactions in DNA.

Authors:  Zhenyu Tan; Yueyuan Xia; Xiangdong Liu; Mingwen Zhao; Yanju Ji; Feng Li; Boda Huang
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Accurate electron inelastic cross sections and stopping powers for liquid water over the 0.1-10 keV range based on an improved dielectric description of the Bethe surface.

Authors:  D Emfietzoglou; H Nikjoo
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Energy distribution in the absorption of radiation.

Authors:  H H Rossi
Journal:  Adv Biol Med Phys       Date:  1967

5.  The influence of hydration on the absolute yields of primary ionic free radicals in gamma-irradiated DNA at 77 K. I. Total radical yields.

Authors:  W Wang; D Becker; M D Sevilla
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Electron energy-loss distributions in solid, dry DNA.

Authors:  J A LaVerne; S M Pimblott
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA.

Authors:  D T Goodhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  GammaH2AX foci induced by gamma rays and 125idU decay.

Authors:  Linda S Yasui
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Computer evaluation of direct and indirect damage induced by free and DNA-bound iodine-125 in the chromatin fibre.

Authors:  M Terrissol; S Edel; E Pomplun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Induction of strand breaks by low-energy electrons (8-68 eV) in a self-assembled monolayer of oligonucleotides: effective cross sections and attenuation lengths.

Authors:  Zhongli Cai; Marie-Eve Dextraze; Pierre Cloutier; Darel Hunting; Léon Sanche
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nanoscale radiation transport and clinical beam modeling for gold nanoparticle dose enhanced radiotherapy (GNPT) using X-rays.

Authors:  Piotr Zygmanski; Erno Sajo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: Quantifying the Radiobiological Damage Using Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Chatzipapas; Panagiotis Papadimitroulas; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Spyridon A Kalospyros; Megumi Hada; Alexandros G Georgakilas; George C Kagadis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.