Literature DB >> 17214512

Accurate electron inelastic cross sections and stopping powers for liquid water over the 0.1-10 keV range based on an improved dielectric description of the Bethe surface.

D Emfietzoglou1, H Nikjoo.   

Abstract

Electron inelastic cross sections and stopping powers for liquid water over the 0.1-10 keV range are presented based on a recently developed dielectric response model for liquid water (D. Emfietzoglou, F. Cucinotta and H. Nikjoo, Radiat. Res. 164, 202-211, 2005) that is consistent with the experimental data over the whole energy-momentum plane. Both exchange and second-order Born corrections are included in a material-specific way using the dielectric functions of liquid water. The numerical results are fitted by simple analytic functions to facilitate their further use. Compared to previous studies, differential cross sections are shifted toward smaller energy losses resulting in smaller inelastic and stopping cross sections with differences reaching, on average, the approximately 20% and approximately 50% level, respectively. Contrary to higher energies, it is shown that the dispersion model for the momentum dependence of the dielectric functions (Bethe ridge) is as important as the optical model used. Within the accuracy of the experimental data (a few percent) upon which our dielectric model is based, the calculations are "exact" to first order, while the uncertainty of the results beyond first order is estimated at the 5-10% level. The present work overcomes the limitations of Bethe's theory at low energies by a self-consistent account of inner-shell effects and may serve to extend the ICRU electron stopping power database for liquid water down to 100 eV with a level of uncertainty similar to that for the higher-energy values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17214512     DOI: 10.1667/RR0551.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  16 in total

1.  Electron Emission from Foils and Biological Materials after Proton Impact.

Authors:  Michael Dingfelder; Anderson Travia; Robert A McLawhorn; Jefferson L Shinpaugh; Larry H Toburen
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.858

2.  Comparisons of calculations with PARTRAC and NOREC: transport of electrons in liquid water.

Authors:  M Dingfelder; R H Ritchie; J E Turner; W Friedland; H G Paretzke; R N Hamm
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Correlation between energy deposition and molecular damage from Auger electrons: A case study of ultra-low energy (5-18 eV) electron interactions with DNA.

Authors:  Mohammad Rezaee; Darel J Hunting; Léon Sanche
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Stopping power and CSDA range calculations for incident electrons and positrons in breast and brain tissues.

Authors:  Mustafa Çağatay Tufan; Tuba Namdar; Hasan Gümüş
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Calculations of Electron Inelastic Mean Free Paths. XI. Data for Liquid Water for Energies from 50 eV to 30 keV.

Authors:  H Shinotsuka; B Da; S Tanuma; H Yoshikawa; C J Powell; D R Penn
Journal:  Surf Interface Anal       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.607

Review 6.  Track-structure simulations for charged particles.

Authors:  Michael Dingfelder
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Establishing Radiolanthanum Chemistry for Targeted Nuclear Medicine Applications.

Authors:  Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy; Nikki A Thiele; Kirsten E Martin; Brett A Vaughn; Justin Devaraj; Aeli P Olson; Todd E Barnhart; Justin J Wilson; Eszter Boros; Jonathan W Engle
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 8.  Auger processes in the 21st century.

Authors:  Roger W Howell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Future directions on low-energy radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  G Massillon-Jl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  In silico nanodosimetry: new insights into nontargeted biological responses to radiation.

Authors:  Zdenka Kuncic; Hilary L Byrne; Aimee L McNamara; Susanna Guatelli; Westa Domanova; Sébastien Incerti
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.