BACKGROUND: The right to self-determination is fundamental in clinical ethics. End-of-life conversations and advance directives (ADs), in addition to preserving this right, have been shown to decrease the likelihood of in-hospital death, improve the quality of care, and lower health costs in the final week of life. Despite these benefits, the rates of AD documentation are poor. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based reminder in improving AD documentation rates. METHODS: We conducted a prospective quality improvement study in outpatients at the Grady Memorial Hospital Purple Pod Clinic in Atlanta, GA. Using the EMR system EPIC we set to implement a reminder system consisting of the addition of "Advanced Directives Counseling" to the problem list (ADPL) of 50% of outpatients meeting one of the following criteria: age >65 years, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), malignancy, cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or stroke. Primary care physicians were encouraged to document ADs for all patients. The number of patients with documented ADs was assessed at 6 months post-test of change. RESULTS: A total of 588 patient charts were screened by seven providers, with 157 patients meeting the predefined criteria for AD documentation. During a 6-month period, 64 patients were seen in the clinic; 38 had AD on their problem list, and 26 did not. Seventy-six percent of charts with ADPL had documentation of an AD. Only 11.5% of those without ADPL had an AD documented. CONCLUSIONS: EMR-based reminders are effective in improving documentation rates of ADs. Further research is needed to establish whether improved documentation impacts inpatient management and costs of care.
BACKGROUND: The right to self-determination is fundamental in clinical ethics. End-of-life conversations and advance directives (ADs), in addition to preserving this right, have been shown to decrease the likelihood of in-hospital death, improve the quality of care, and lower health costs in the final week of life. Despite these benefits, the rates of AD documentation are poor. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based reminder in improving AD documentation rates. METHODS: We conducted a prospective quality improvement study in outpatients at the Grady Memorial Hospital Purple Pod Clinic in Atlanta, GA. Using the EMR system EPIC we set to implement a reminder system consisting of the addition of "Advanced Directives Counseling" to the problem list (ADPL) of 50% of outpatients meeting one of the following criteria: age >65 years, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), malignancy, cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or stroke. Primary care physicians were encouraged to document ADs for all patients. The number of patients with documented ADs was assessed at 6 months post-test of change. RESULTS: A total of 588 patient charts were screened by seven providers, with 157 patients meeting the predefined criteria for AD documentation. During a 6-month period, 64 patients were seen in the clinic; 38 had AD on their problem list, and 26 did not. Seventy-six percent of charts with ADPL had documentation of an AD. Only 11.5% of those without ADPL had an AD documented. CONCLUSIONS: EMR-based reminders are effective in improving documentation rates of ADs. Further research is needed to establish whether improved documentation impacts inpatient management and costs of care.
Authors: J A Green; P L Ephraim; F F Hill-Briggs; T Browne; T S Strigo; C L Hauer; R A Stametz; J D Darer; U D Patel; K Lang-Lindsey; B L Bankes; S A Bolden; P Danielson; S Ruff; L Schmidt; A Swoboda; P Woods; B Vinson; D Littlewood; G Jackson; J F Pendergast; J St Clair Russell; K Collins; E Norfolk; I D Bucaloiu; S Kethireddy; C Collins; D Davis; J dePrisco; D Malloy; C J Diamantidis; S Fulmer; J Martin; D Schatell; N Tangri; A Sees; C Siegrist; J Breed; A Medley; E Graboski; J Billet; M Hackenberg; D Singer; S Stewart; A Alkon; N A Bhavsar; L Lewis-Boyer; C Martz; C Yule; R C Greer; M Saunders; B Cameron; L E Boulware Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Peter O'Halloran; Helen Noble; Kelly Norwood; Peter Maxwell; Joanne Shields; Damian Fogarty; Fliss Murtagh; Rachael Morton; Kevin Brazil Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Mohammed Al Ani; George Garas; James Hollingshead; Drostan Cheetham; Thanos Athanasiou; Vanash Patel Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 2.132
Authors: Van C Willis; Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; Yalda Jabbarpour; Elisabeth L Scheufele; Yull E Arriaga; Monica Ajinkya; Kyu B Rhee; Andrew Bazemore Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2022-01-21