Bushra Ashraf1, Muhammad Saaiq2, Khaleeq-Uz- Zaman3. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mother and Child Health Centre, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan. 3. Departments of Neurosurgery and Medical Education, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Doctor-patient communication has far reaching influences on the overall well-being of the patients. Words are powerful tools in the doctor's armamentarium, having both healing as well as harming effects. Doctors need to be conscious about the choice of their words. This study aimed to determine the frequency and pattern of Nocebo Phenomenon (NP) un-intentionally induced by the communication of surgeons and anesthetists through the course of various interventional procedures such as surgery, anesthesia, and crucial communication encounters with their patients. METHODS: The study was carried out by the Department of Medical Education (DME), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad over six months period. All residents and faculty members serving at our institute in various surgical and anesthesia departments constituted the study population. A questionnaire was employed as the data collection tool. RESULTS: Significant proportions of the doctor-patient communications under scrutiny entailed NP. It was more frequently observed in association with female gender of the involved professionals, residency status versus faculty position, and shorter professional experience (i.e. <5 years). Although the participants endorsed the fact that the choice of their words influenced the well-being of their patients, none of them were actually aware of the concept of NP. CONCLUSION: NP existed in the clinical practice of the surgeons and anesthetists during their communication with patients. It was more frequently found among females, residents and professionals with less than five years of working experience. There is need to create awareness among these professionals about the subtle negative messages conveyed by such communication and alert them that the nocebo effects have negative repercussions on the clinical outcomes of their patients. The professionals should be formally educated to avoid nocebo words and phrases.
BACKGROUND: Doctor-patient communication has far reaching influences on the overall well-being of the patients. Words are powerful tools in the doctor's armamentarium, having both healing as well as harming effects. Doctors need to be conscious about the choice of their words. This study aimed to determine the frequency and pattern of Nocebo Phenomenon (NP) un-intentionally induced by the communication of surgeons and anesthetists through the course of various interventional procedures such as surgery, anesthesia, and crucial communication encounters with their patients. METHODS: The study was carried out by the Department of Medical Education (DME), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad over six months period. All residents and faculty members serving at our institute in various surgical and anesthesia departments constituted the study population. A questionnaire was employed as the data collection tool. RESULTS: Significant proportions of the doctor-patient communications under scrutiny entailed NP. It was more frequently observed in association with female gender of the involved professionals, residency status versus faculty position, and shorter professional experience (i.e. <5 years). Although the participants endorsed the fact that the choice of their words influenced the well-being of their patients, none of them were actually aware of the concept of NP. CONCLUSION: NP existed in the clinical practice of the surgeons and anesthetists during their communication with patients. It was more frequently found among females, residents and professionals with less than five years of working experience. There is need to create awareness among these professionals about the subtle negative messages conveyed by such communication and alert them that the nocebo effects have negative repercussions on the clinical outcomes of their patients. The professionals should be formally educated to avoid nocebo words and phrases.
Authors: Jürgen Lorenz; Michael Hauck; Robert C Paur; Yoko Nakamura; Roger Zimmermann; Burkhart Bromm; Andreas K Engel Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: John R Keltner; Ansgar Furst; Catherine Fan; Rick Redfern; Ben Inglis; Howard L Fields Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: G Liccardi; G Senna; M Russo; P Bonadonna; M Crivellaro; A Dama; M D'Amato; G D'Amato; G W Canonica; G Passalacqua Journal: J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Johanna Carolina Rojas-Mirquez; Milton Jose Max Rodriguez-Zuñiga; Francisco Javier Bonilla-Escobar; Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo; Mike Petkov; Lino Becerra; David Borsook; Clas Linnman Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.558