Literature DB >> 24986947

An analysis of Oxford hip and knee scores following primary hip and knee replacement performed at a specialist centre.

G S Matharu1, C W McBryde1, C A Robb1, P B Pynsent1.   

Abstract

The Oxford hip and knee scores (OHS and OKS) are validated patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR), hip resurfacing (HR), total knee replacement (TKR) and unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). We analysed the absolute OHS and OKS and change in scores following THR, HR, TKR, and UKR performed at one specialist centre. All patients undergoing and completing at least one Oxford score were eligible for inclusion in the study which included 27 950 OHS and 19 750 OKS in 13 682 patients. Data were analysed using non-linear quantile regression. The median absolute Oxford scores for THR, HR, TKR and UKR were pre-operative 68.8% (15.0/48), 58.3% (20.0/48), 66.7% (16.0/48), 60.4% (19.0/48) respectively: and post-operative asymptote was 14.6% (41.0/48), 5.8% (45.2/48), 31.2% (33.0/48), 29.2% (34.0/48). The median asymptotic change from the pre-operative score for THR, HR, TKR and UKR were 47.9% (23.0/48), 47.9% (23.0/48), 33.3% (16.0/48) and 32.4% (15.5/48), respectively. The median time at which no further appreciable change in score was achieved post-operatively was 0.7 years for THR, 1.1 years for HR, 0.9 years for TKR and 1.1 years for UKR. The curves produced from this analysis could be used to educate patients, and to audit the performance of a surgeon and an institution. The time to achieve a stable improvement in outcome varied between different types of joint replacement, which may have implications for the timing of post-operative review. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Function; Outcome; OHS; OKS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986947     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Yuo-Yu Lee; Patricia D Franklin; Wenjun Li; David J Mayman; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Systematic effects of femoral component rotation and tibial slope on the medial and lateral tibiofemoral flexion gaps in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Claudio Stöbe; Sebastian Hoechel; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Andrej M Nowakowski
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Sonication of revised hip and knee prostheses detects occult infections, improves clinical outcomes and prevents re - revisions. A case series study.

Authors:  Argyris C Hadjimichael; Athanasios F Foukas; Angelos Kaspiris; Dimitris Vasileiou; Spyros Kamariotis; Antonios Stylianakis; Elias S Vasiliadis; Olga D Savvidou; Athanasios Antonopoulos
Journal:  Infect Prev Pract       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  Clinical outcomes after using patient specific instrumentation: is it worth the effort? A minimum 5-year retrospective review of 298 PSI knees.

Authors:  Luke Nugent; Sarang Kasture; Muthu Ganapathi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.