Literature DB >> 24986737

Demonstrating the benefits of clinical nuclear imaging: is it time to add economic analysis?

Poul F Høilund-Carlsen1, Oke Gerke, Werner Vach.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24986737     DOI： 10.1007/s00259-014-2807-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN： 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Generating evidence for clinical benefit of PET/CT in diagnosing cancer patients.

Authors:  Werner Vach; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Oke Gerke; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified.

Authors:  Werner Vach; Oke Gerke; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  A capture-recapture analysis demonstrated that randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests on patient outcomes are rare.

Authors:  Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Clare Davenport; Anne Eisinga; Chris Hyde; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Randomized controlled trials on PET: a systematic review of topics, design, and quality.

Authors:  Fülöp Scheibler; Polina Zumbé; Inger Janssen; Melanie Viebahn; Milly Schröer-Günther; Robert Grosselfinger; Elke Hausner; Stefan Sauerland; Stefan Lange
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Andrew D Oxman; Jan Brozek; Paul Glasziou; Patrick Bossuyt; Stephanie Chang; Paola Muti; Roman Jaeschke; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2008-12

Review 6.  Decision analysis to complete diagnostic research by closing the gap between test characteristics and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Joanna D Schaafsma; Yolanda van der Graaf; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Erik Buskens
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Integration of meta-analysis and economic decision modeling for evaluating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Alexander J Sutton; Nicola J Cooper; Steve Goodacre; Matthew Stevenson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Decision-analytic modeling to evaluate benefits and harms of medical tests: uses and limitations.

Authors:  Thomas A Trikalinos; Uwe Siebert; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Choonsik Lee; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael Flynn; Robert T Greenlee; Randell L Kruger; Mark C Hornbrook; Douglas Roblin; Leif I Solberg; Nicholas Vanneman; Sheila Weinmann; Andrew E Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272
View more
  3 in total

1.  Practice-based evidence for the clinical benefit of PET/CT-results of the first oncologic PET/CT registry in Germany.

Authors:  Christina Pfannenberg; Brigitte Gueckel; Lisa Wang; Sergios Gatidis; Susann-Cathrin Olthof; Werner Vach; Matthias Reimold; Christian la Fougere; Konstantin Nikolaou; Peter Martus
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations.

Authors:  Henrik Petersen; Paw Christian Holdgaard; Poul Henning Madsen; Lene Meldgaard Knudsen; Dorte Gad; Anders Eggert Gravergaard; Max Rohde; Christian Godballe; Bodil Elisabeth Engelmann; Karsten Bech; Dorte Teilmann-Jørgensen; Ole Mogensen; Jens Karstoft; Jørgen Johansen; Janne Buck Christensen; Allan Johansen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  FDG-PET/CT Versus Contrast-Enhanced CT for Response Evaluation in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fredrik Helland; Martine Hallin Henriksen; Oke Gerke; Marianne Vogsen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.