PURPOSE: This systematic review examines the literature to identify the context and extent of implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model to understand the experience of health and functioning in persons with chronic conditions from the person perspective. METHOD: The literature search was conducted through five electronic databases between 2001 and December 2012. Reference lists of included papers were also searched. Articles in which the ICF was used to understand the health and functioning experience of adults with chronic conditions from the person-perspective were included. Data were extracted and analysed to identify the year of publication, geographical location, health condition, context of ICF use, authors' remarks and identified limitations of the ICF. RESULTS: Thirty-seven qualitative and mixed-methods studies were included representing 18 countries and a range of chronic conditions. The ICF was found to be used to elicit and analyse people's narratives, with the majority of studies reporting that the ICF provides a comprehensive analysis of experiences and needs from the person perspective. Some limitations to its use and the need to classify the "personal factors" component were reported. CONCLUSION: The ICF has been used to provide a comprehensive understanding of health and functioning in persons with chronic conditions from the person perspective, although there are currently relatively few studies which have used the ICF in this context. Limitations regarding its use were reported which should be considered by users of the model and during its revision process. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The ICF encourages a bio-psycho-social and person-centred approach to healthcare and may provide a useful tool for guiding clinical assessment and encouraging clinicians to consider the multitude of factors which impact health, which may result in more specific and individualised treatment targeted at individual needs. Using a common framework that can be understood across health disciplines may enhance interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, improving health care delivery. The ICF may be used to compare perspectives of individuals and their health professionals and to identify people's needs that are not adequately being addressed, which may have significant implications for improving healthcare provided and overall health outcomes.
PURPOSE: This systematic review examines the literature to identify the context and extent of implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model to understand the experience of health and functioning in persons with chronic conditions from the person perspective. METHOD: The literature search was conducted through five electronic databases between 2001 and December 2012. Reference lists of included papers were also searched. Articles in which the ICF was used to understand the health and functioning experience of adults with chronic conditions from the person-perspective were included. Data were extracted and analysed to identify the year of publication, geographical location, health condition, context of ICF use, authors' remarks and identified limitations of the ICF. RESULTS: Thirty-seven qualitative and mixed-methods studies were included representing 18 countries and a range of chronic conditions. The ICF was found to be used to elicit and analyse people's narratives, with the majority of studies reporting that the ICF provides a comprehensive analysis of experiences and needs from the person perspective. Some limitations to its use and the need to classify the "personal factors" component were reported. CONCLUSION: The ICF has been used to provide a comprehensive understanding of health and functioning in persons with chronic conditions from the person perspective, although there are currently relatively few studies which have used the ICF in this context. Limitations regarding its use were reported which should be considered by users of the model and during its revision process. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The ICF encourages a bio-psycho-social and person-centred approach to healthcare and may provide a useful tool for guiding clinical assessment and encouraging clinicians to consider the multitude of factors which impact health, which may result in more specific and individualised treatment targeted at individual needs. Using a common framework that can be understood across health disciplines may enhance interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, improving health care delivery. The ICF may be used to compare perspectives of individuals and their health professionals and to identify people's needs that are not adequately being addressed, which may have significant implications for improving healthcare provided and overall health outcomes.
Authors: Carla Sabariego; Michaela Coenen; Elizabeth Ito; Klemens Fheodoroff; Chiara Scaratti; Matilde Leonardi; Anastasia Vlachou; Panayiota Stavroussi; Valentina Brecelj; Dare S Kovačič; Eva Esteban Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chiara Scaratti; Matilde Leonardi; Fabiola Silvaggi; Carolina C Ávila; Amalia Muñoz-Murillo; Panayiota Stavroussi; Olga Roka; Helena Burger; Klemens Fheodoroff; Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk; Carla Sabariego; Eva Esteban; Sonja Gruber; Olga Svestkova; Rune Halvorsen; Asel Kadyrbaeva; Sabrina Ferraina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Djoeke van Dale; Lidwien Lemmens; Marieke Hendriksen; Nella Savolainen; Péter Nagy; Edit Marosi; Michela Eigenmann; Ingrid Stegemann; Heather L Rogers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Luciana M M Santos; Pedro Henrique S Figueiredo; Ana C R Silva; Patrícia C Campos; Gabriele T Gonçalves; Jaqueline de Paula C Freitas; Fidelis Antônio da Silva Junior; Jousielle Márcia Santos; Frederico L Alves; Vanessa G B Rodrigues; Emílio Henrique B Maciel; Maria Cecília S M Prates; Borja Sañudo; Redha Taiar; Mario Bernardo-Filho; Vanessa P Lima; Henrique S Costa; Vanessa A Mendonça; Ana Cristina R Lacerda Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 2.388