Literature DB >> 24986544

Patients' preferences for surgical and adjuvant systemic treatment in early breast cancer: a systematic review.

Victoria C Hamelinck1, Esther Bastiaannet2, Arwen H Pieterse3, Ilse Jannink4, Cornelis J H van de Velde5, Gerrit-Jan Liefers5, Anne M Stiggelbout6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment decisions in early breast cancer can revolve around type of surgery and whether or not to have adjuvant systemic therapy. This systematic review aims to give an overview of patient self-reported factors affecting preferences for breast conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy (MAST), the minimal benefit patients require from adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) and/or adjuvant hormonal therapy (aHT) to consider it worthwhile, and factors influencing this minimally-required benefit.
METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant articles. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data.
RESULTS: We identified 15 studies on surgical and six on adjuvant systemic treatment decision-making. Factors affecting patient preference for BCS most frequently related to body image (44%), while factors influencing preference for MAST most often related to survival/recurrence (46%). To make adjuvant systemic therapy worthwhile, the median required absolute increase in survival rate was 0.1-10% and the median required additional life expectancy was 1 day to 5 years. The range of individual preferences was wide within studies. Participants in the aHT studies required larger median benefits than those in the aCT studies. Factors associated with judging smaller benefits sufficient most often (44%) related to quality of life (e.g., less treatment toxicity).
CONCLUSION: Decisive factors in patients' preferences for surgery type commonly relate to body image and survival/recurrence. Most participants judged small to moderate benefits sufficient to consider adjuvant systemic therapy worthwhile, but individual preferences varied widely. Clinicians should therefore consider the patient's preferences to tailor their treatment recommendations accordingly.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; Adjuvant hormonal therapy; Breast cancer; Patient preferences; Surgery; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986544     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  23 in total

1.  Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chalanda N Evans; Noel T Brewer; Susan T Vadaparampil; Marc Boisvert; Yvonne Ottaviano; M Catherine Lee; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Lisa Newman; Jennifer J Griggs; Mary Ann Kosir; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Willingness of women with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer to take adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Authors:  N J Lipton; J Jesin; E Warner; X Cao; A Kiss; D Desautels; K J Jerzak
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Factors that shape preference for acupuncture or cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of insomnia in cancer patients.

Authors:  Sheila N Garland; Whitney Eriksen; Sarah Song; Joshua Dearing; Frances K Barg; Philip Gehrman; Jun J Mao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Treatment recommendations by clinicians in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: better work-up leads to less discussion.

Authors:  Jo Raskin; Annelies Janssens; Jan P Van Meerbeeck
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-11

6.  Decision Regret following Treatment for Localized Breast Cancer: Is Regret Stable Over Time?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Yun Li; Ken Resnicow; John J Graff; Ann S Hamilton; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Managing psychosocial issues faced by young women with breast cancer at the time of diagnosis and during active treatment.

Authors:  Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Taiwo Adesoye; Joan R Bloom
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.302

8.  Myeloma Patient Value Mapping: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Myeloma Treatment Preferences in the UK.

Authors:  Simon Fifer; Jayne Galinsky; Sarah Richard
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  A framework for analysis of research risks and benefits to participants in standard of care pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie C Chen; Scott Yh Kim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  The preference to receive chemotherapy and cancer-related outcomes in older adults with breast cancer CALGB 49907 (Alliance).

Authors:  Ajeet Gajra; Linda McCall; Hyman B Muss; Harvey J Cohen; Aminah Jatoi; Karla V Ballman; Ann H Partridge; Linda Sutton; Barbara A Parker; Gustav Magrinat; Heidi D Klepin; Jacqueline M Lafky; Arti Hurria
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.