| Literature DB >> 24986065 |
Jun Feng1, Yanyan Gu, Yang Sun, Lifang Han, Chao Yang, Wei Zhang, Mingfeng Cao, Cunjiang Song, Weixia Gao, Shufang Wang.
Abstract
We constructed a metabolically engineered glutamate-independent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain with considerable γ-PGA production. It was carried out by double-deletion of the cwlO gene and epsA-O cluster, as well as insertion of the vgb gene in the bacteria chromosome. The final generated strain NK-PV elicited the highest production of γ-PGA (5.12 g l(-1)), which was 63.2% higher than that of the wild-type NK-1 strain (3.14 g l(-1)). The γ-PGA purity also improved in the NK-PV strain of 80.4% compared with 76.8% for the control. Experiments on bacterial biofilm formation experiment showed that NK-1 and NK-c (ΔcwlO) strains can form biofilm; the epsA-O deletion NK-7 and NK-PV strains could only form an incomplete biofilm.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24986065 PMCID: PMC4229325 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Figure 1Confirmation of the gene deletion or insertion by PCR. Chromosomal DNA served as the template for amplification. Lane M, DNA marker III; Lane L, DNA ladder (1 kb); Lane 1, 2, gene deletion or insertion strains amplified with relative primers; Lane NK-1, wild-type NK-1 strains amplified with relative primers.
Figure 2Conformation of the expression of vgb gene.
A. RT-PCR results between NK-1 and NK-PV strain. Lane M, DNA marker III; Lane 1–4, amplification results using primers VG-F and VG-R with RNA from NK-1 strain, RNA from NK-PV strain, cDNA from NK-1 strain and cDNA from NK-PV strain as template respectively.
B. CO-spectra difference analysis of NK-1 and NK-PV strain.
Figure 3γ-PGA fermentation results between NK-1 and mutant strains.
A. Time curves of cell growth of NK-1 and mutant strains.
B. Comparison of γ-PGA production and cell dry weight between NK-1 and mutant strains after 48 h cultivation. Values represent means ± SD.
Comparison of γ-PGA fermentation results between NK-1 and mutant strains
| Strains | Yield (g l−1) | Mw (× 105) | Viscosity (cP) | CDW (g l−1) | Purity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NK-1 | 3.14 ± 0.02 | 3.39 ± 0.08 | 10.05 ± 3.31 | 2.09 ± 0.22 | 76.8 ± 1.1 |
| NK-c | 3.96 ± 0.49 | 4.12 ± 0.04 | 16.70 ± 1.85 | 2.15 ± 0.09 | 75.7 ± 1.7 |
| NK-7 | 4.44 ± 0.71 | 4.01 ± 0.14 | 19.40 ± 2.40 | 2.24 ± 0.05 | 81.8 ± 0.8 |
| NK-PV | 5.12 ± 0.22 | 3.76 ± 0.49 | 31.57 ± 1.33 | 2.51 ± 0.14 | 80.4 ± 1.3 |
Figure 4Cell pellicle formation between NK-1 and mutant strains. Cells were cultured at 30°C for 80 h in MSgg broth contained within a 6-well microtiter dish.
Figure 5Colony morphologies of NK-1 and mutant strains. Cells were cultured at 37°C for 36 h in LB agar plate.
Strains and plasmids used in this study
| Strains and plasmids | Relevant genotype and characteristics | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) producing strain | (Cao | |
| LL3 derivative, ΔpMC1, Δ | This lab | |
| NK-1 derivative, Δ | This work | |
| NK-1 derivative, Δ | This work | |
| NK-1derivative, Δ | This work | |
| NK-c derivative with complementary plasmid pWH1520-cwlO | (Feng | |
| NK-PV derivative with complementary plasmid pWH1520-cwlO | This work | |
| NK-1 derivative with | This work | |
| NK-c derivative with | This work | |
| F-, φ80d | This lab | |
| F-, | This lab | |
| Plasmids | ||
| pKSV7 | Shuttle vector, temperature-sensitive (ts) replication origin, Ampr (gram-negative)and Cmr (gram-positive) | (Smith and Youngman, |
| pMD19-T | T easy vector for gene cloning; Ampr | Takara |
| pKSPVK | pKSV7 derivative consists of LL3 16S rRNA gene, promoter p43, | (Zhang |
| p-upp | pKSV7-derivation with | This lab |
| p-upp-ΔAO | pKSV7-derivation with | This work |
| p-upp-ΔcwlO | pKSV7-derivation with | (Feng |
| p-upp-spvx | pKSV7-derivation with | This work |
| pWHV | pWH1520 derivative, | (Zhang |
| pWH1520-cwlO | pWH1520 derivative carrying the structural gene | (Feng |
Primers used in this study
| Primers | Sequence(5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| AO-SF | GCC |
| AO-SR | CAGTCTCGATCAGACGTGTCATGATAAAAATCAGTAA |
| AO-XF | GATTTTTATCATGACACGTCTGATCGAGACTGCAGGCA |
| AO-XR | CCC |
| AO-SS | GAAAAATGCGCCGCCATGAATCCATAC |
| AO-ZZ | CGTCTGGTCATCATCAATAAAAGCCACAGG |
| AO-XX | CGCGACAGATAATCTTTCGTGTCACGG |
| cwlO-SS | GACTGACGTCATGAGCTGCTGGGTTTTT |
| cwlO-XX | CCAAGTTCTTTTTCACCGGGAACGCC |
| Amy-SF | CCCC |
| Amy-SR | TGCATGCACGAAGCTCTTTCGTTTTTGAATCATTTTTCT |
| Amy-XF | GCGGTTGAATAATGAATATGTACGGGACAAAAGGGAC |
| Amy-XR | CCCC |
| PV-F | ATTCAAAAACGAAAGAGCTTCGTGCATGCAGGCCG |
| PV-R | TTGTCCCGTACATATTCATTATTCAACCGCTTGAG |
| Amy-SS | AGGTTTTCACCCGCATATTAAGCAG |
| Amy-XX | AGGACAGAAAAAACAGAAACAGCACG |
| VG-F | TCCTGTATTGAAGGAGCATGGCGTTAC |
| VG-R | CGCCTGCTTGACAATGTTTGACTGC |
The underlined is the restriction enzyme cleavage site.