Literature DB >> 24985469

Do design adaptations of a trochanteric nail make sense for Asian patients? Results of a multicenter study of the PFNA-II in Japan.

Takeshi Sawaguchi1, Daigo Sakagoshi2, Yosuke Shima3, Takaaki Ito4, Sabine Goldhahn5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Asian patients with osteoporosis suffer from an increased incidence of hip fracture and a potentially increased risk of fixation failure due to anatomical differences compared to Caucasians. To cope with these differences, an Asian size- and geometry-adapted Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA-II) was developed. The objective of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the risk of fracture fixation complications (FFCs), the occurrence of mismatch and the quality of life status of patients treated with the PFNA-II. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 176 Japanese patients with an isolated, unstable, closed trochanteric fracture were treated with the PFNA-II. Patients were prospectively screened for anticipated complications and classified accordingly; complications were centrally reviewed by a complication review board to avoid bias by the treating surgeon, and categorized using a standardized reporting system. Outcome measurements included the occurrence and evaluation of FFCs, the radiological assessment of mismatch and quality of life measured with the EQ-5D score.
RESULTS: 3 Intraoperative and 15 postoperative complications were found in 16/176 patients. The risk of sustaining any intraoperative or postoperative FFC was 1.7% (3/176; 95% CI: 0.35-4.9) and 8% (14/176; 95% CI: 4.4-13), respectively. The most likely cause for FFCs was the "bone/fracture" factor (9/14 patients). Radiologically detectable contact of the implant with the inner cortex ("mismatch") was reported for 17/173 patients (10%).
CONCLUSIONS: The reported complication risks and mismatches are reasonable for this patient cohort. The geometry- and size-adapted PFNA-II is relatively safe but requires standardized assessment in a larger target cohort.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Hip fracture; Intramedullary nail; Mismatch; PFNA; Quality of life; Trochanteric fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24985469     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

Review 1.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

2.  Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome.

Authors:  Xavier Lizano-Díez; Marius Johann Baptist Keel; Klaus Arno Siebenrock; Marc Tey; Johannes Dominik Bastian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Treatment With Helical Blade Cephalomedullary Nail for Two-Part Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Ichiro Okano; Takatoshi Sawada; Nobumasa Kushima; Tetsuya Tachibana; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  Influence of different great trochanteric entry points on the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shuo Pan; Xiao-Hui Liu; Tao Feng; Hui-Jun Kang; Zhi-Guang Tian; Chun-Guang Lou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Clinical Outcome of Mid-Length Proximal Femoral Nail for Patients With Trochanteric Hip Fractures: Preliminary Investigation in a Japanese Cohort of Patients More Than 70 Years Old.

Authors:  Tomohiro Matsumura; Tsuneari Takahashi; Mitsuharu Nakashima; Yoshiya Nibe; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-24

6.  Comparison of Post-Operative Muscular Strength Between Gamma Nailing and Hemiarthroplasty System in Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Noda; Yasuhiro Saegusa; Masayasu Takahashi; Chisa Noguchi; Chihiro Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Mikami; Akira Gotouda
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Outcomes of Combined Neck and Trochanter Fractures of the Femur Treated with Cephallomedullary Nail in Elderly.

Authors:  Hyunseung Yoo; Youngho Cho; Seongmun Hwang
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2019-11-28

8.  Finite element analysis of two cephalomedullary nails in treatment of elderly reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: zimmer natural nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation-ΙΙ.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Jian-Xiong Ma; Ying Wang; Hao-Hao Bai; Lei Sun; Yan Wang; Bin Lu; Ben-Chao Dong; Ai-Xian Tian; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.